Out of steam? There was a time when a visit by the OSCE Minsk Group to the region used to be a matter of great public interest. Not anymore.

It is never right to shoot the messenger. It is easy to put the blame for the failure of the twenty-one year old peace process led by the OSCE Minsk Group co-chair countries (Russia, France and the United States) to deliver a solution to the long-standing Nagorno-Karabakh conflict on the three countries, or even on the diplomats that represent them. That will not be fair. Even if they must share part of the blame, there is no doubt that those responsible for the situation as it is today are closer to home.

Yet it is a fact that the Minsk Process now looks tired and out of steam. Yesterday the diplomats of the three co-chair countries, accompanied by the evergreen representative of the OSCE Chairman, Ambasador Kaspzyk called on President Ilham Aliev in Baku. The diplomats were in Armenia two weeks ago, but the visit to Azerbaijan and the meeting with Aliev had to wait until the end of the Novruz Holidays. The report of the meeting on the website of the Azerbaijani President could not be any blander, simply saying "The sides exchanged views on the current state and prospects for negotiations to resolve the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh." There has not been any statement by the diplomats themselves.

There used to be a time when the presence of the Minsk Group in the region used to attract a lot of public attention and debate. Indeed past co-chair, such as Ambassadors Kavanagh and Bryza of the US and Ambassador Fassier of France, often used the visits as an opportunity to reach out to public opinion in Armenia and Azerbaijan. For many reasons it seems that those days are over, at least for the moment. "Exchanging views on the prospects for negotiations" is not something that is going to get public opinion excited. Peace it seems, has to wait, whilst other options are considered and tried.

source: commonspace.eu

photo: President Ilham Aliev with the co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group Igor Popov (Russia), Ian Kelly (USA), Jacques Faure (France), as well as the special representative of the OSCE chairman-in-office, Andrzej Kaspzyk a their meeting in Baku on 2 April 2013.(picture copurtesy of the Press Office of the president of Azerbaijan).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
''Coalition of the Willing'' meets in Kyiv to restate its support for Ukraine

''Coalition of the Willing'' meets in Kyiv to restate its support for Ukraine

The ''Coalition of the  Willing''  of thirty five countries, has renewed its support of Ukriane, at a meeting in Kyiv, held on Ukraine's national day on 24 August, under the chairmanship of British Prime Minister,A ndy Burnham. Burnham has promised to keep up the pressure on Russia despite Moscow's "outrageous threats", on his first official visit to Ukraine as UK prime minister. Burnham met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and chaired his first meeting of the "coalition of the willing", set up by the UK and France under his predecessor Sir Keir Starmer. He said the coalition was "doing everything we can" while urging the US Congress to "ratchet up" economic pressure on Russia. The government has agreed to hand over blueprints for British-made components for the Scalp missile, a French version of the UK's Storm Shadow cruise missile - allowing Ukraine to produce the long-range weapon domestically. During the meeting with France and Ukraine, Burnham said allies were doing "everything we can" to "dig into our own stocks and help others dig into their stocks" of air defences to protect Ukraine. "This is the moment to keep up the pressure on Russia, the moment to squeeze their ability to fund this illegal war," Burnham said, praising the "strength" of the Ukrainian people. "Ukraine has been Europe's protector, not a drain on our security but the front line in keeping Europe safe." It comes after Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov criticised the UK's decision to share the missile blueprints. Peskov said it prevented "even the slightest progress" towards achieving peace. He told reporters on Monday that the Russian military was already gathering data to locate any missile production sites to destroy them. "Britain is involved in this war on the side of the Kyiv regime. Britain methodically and regularly adds fuel to the fire," he added. In response, Burnham said: "Who started the fire? That's the question, isn't it?" He added the issue of missile interceptors would be the main topic at the coalition of the willing meeting. Burnham chaired his first meeting of the "coalition of the willing" in Kyiv Burnham has been reaffirming the UK's backing for Kyiv in the wake of escalating Russian strikes on Ukraine in recent weeks - including one on a shopping centre on Friday that killed at least 16 people. In a joint statement after the meeting, Burnham and co-chairs French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the group would aim to strength Kyiv's air defences "as a matter or urgent priority". They also condemned Moscow's "systemic and escalating strikes against Ukraine's cities, critical infrastructure and civilians" and pledged to "constrain Russia's war chest through sanctions and actions against the "shadow fleet". (click image to read more).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)