Opinion: "War in Karabakh can only start due to Russian provocations"

In this op-ed for commonspace.eu, Azerbaijani conflictologist Avaz Hasanov says that at this stage neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan are interested in starting a new war in Karabakh, but if a new war was to start this will only strengthen Russia's hand in the region.

It becomes quite clear from the existing rhetoric in the country, that we will witness the continuing relevance of military sentiments in the region until Azerbaijan liberates its lands from the occupation, or the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is resolved. Referring to this, Azerbaijan increases its military expenditures, and will continue to increase them, and will also seek to acquire new weapons, especially aviation. Everyone is confident in Azerbaijan that this war will be more a war of technical innovations. The military potential of the country is strengthening precisely in this direction.

In turn, Russia, by selling arms to Azerbaijan and arming Armenia, is interested in establishing a military balance in the region. Russia does not want to lose control over the region, even in the event the conflict is re-ignited. Russia is not interested in resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, it flirts with Azerbaijan and Armenia. If ever it would be possible to remove Russia element from this conflict, then it will be possible to talk about the unlikelihood of war. The current leadership of Russia does not know any other ways than the use of force, and it does not appear likely that it will leave Azerbaijan and Armenia alone, in compliance with civilized rules, to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

According to the Azerbaijani side, its desire to start a war is a means of influencing Armenia to liberate the occupied lands. Forcing Armenia to liberate the land by peaceful means is the most beneficial and least bloody way for Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan's propensity to start a war does not seem real under the current state of its economic projects, or at a time when its economy is weakening. For Armenia, too, it is not attractive to start and continue the war. As a result of the war, Armenia already achieved what it wanted to achieve. It is to start a war again that will jeopardize the country's economy, and increase political and military risks. It is therefore unlikely.

In this scenario, war may begin as a result of Russia's provocation. The war in Karabakh would be the best gift for the greater strengthening of Putin's power in the Caucasus. At the same time, war would be a good reason for the return to this region of the West and America. For now Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan are able to restrain war from erupting - apparently they learned a lesson from last year's April war. What will happen in the future, no one knows.

Source: Avaz Hasanov is a conflictologist from Azerbaijan. He contributed this op-ed to commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Borrell speaks about global changes and challenges

Borrell speaks about global changes and challenges

EU High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, delivered an important policy speech on Friday 3 May during which he did a wide tour d'horizon of the current global situation and the challenges it flags up for Europe and for the world. Speaking in an academic setting, delivering the Dahrendorf Lecture at St Antony's College Oxford, Borrell spoke of a world where there is much more confrontation than co-operation, where there is more polarity and less multilateralism, Borrell spoke about the diminishing role of the United States as world hegemon and the rise of China. We, Europeans, wanted to create in our neighbourhood a ring of friends. Instead of that, what we have today is a ring of fire. A ring of fire coming from the Sahel to the Middle East, the Caucasus and now in the battlefields of Ukraine, the High Representative said: Speaking on Russia, Borrell said  Under Putin’s leadership, Russia has returned to the imperialist understanding of the world. Imperial Russia from the Tzar times and the Soviet empire times have been rehabilitated by Putin dreaming of a former size and influence.  "It was Georgia in 2008. It was Crimea in 2014. We did not see, or we did not want to see, the evolution of Russia under Putin’s watch. Even though Putin himself had warned us at the Munich Security Conference in 2007. It is important to re-read what Putin said in 2007 at the Munich [Security] Conference that I am afraid that nobody wanted to hear or to understand." Borell described Putin as "an existential threat". In his speech Borell dwelt on the wars in Ukraine and in Gaza. "Now, we have two wars. And we, Europeans, are not prepared for the harshness of the world." The High Representative said that the way of living of the Europeans, "this best combination of political freedom, economic prosperity and social cohesion that the humanity has never been able to invent, is certainly in danger. And in order to face these challenges, I think that we have to work on three dimensions: Principles, Cooperation and Strength."

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Borrell speaks about global changes and challenges

Borrell speaks about global changes and challenges

EU High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, delivered an important policy speech on Friday 3 May during which he did a wide tour d'horizon of the current global situation and the challenges it flags up for Europe and for the world. Speaking in an academic setting, delivering the Dahrendorf Lecture at St Antony's College Oxford, Borrell spoke of a world where there is much more confrontation than co-operation, where there is more polarity and less multilateralism, Borrell spoke about the diminishing role of the United States as world hegemon and the rise of China. We, Europeans, wanted to create in our neighbourhood a ring of friends. Instead of that, what we have today is a ring of fire. A ring of fire coming from the Sahel to the Middle East, the Caucasus and now in the battlefields of Ukraine, the High Representative said: Speaking on Russia, Borrell said  Under Putin’s leadership, Russia has returned to the imperialist understanding of the world. Imperial Russia from the Tzar times and the Soviet empire times have been rehabilitated by Putin dreaming of a former size and influence.  "It was Georgia in 2008. It was Crimea in 2014. We did not see, or we did not want to see, the evolution of Russia under Putin’s watch. Even though Putin himself had warned us at the Munich Security Conference in 2007. It is important to re-read what Putin said in 2007 at the Munich [Security] Conference that I am afraid that nobody wanted to hear or to understand." Borell described Putin as "an existential threat". In his speech Borell dwelt on the wars in Ukraine and in Gaza. "Now, we have two wars. And we, Europeans, are not prepared for the harshness of the world." The High Representative said that the way of living of the Europeans, "this best combination of political freedom, economic prosperity and social cohesion that the humanity has never been able to invent, is certainly in danger. And in order to face these challenges, I think that we have to work on three dimensions: Principles, Cooperation and Strength."