Opinion: A view from Yerevan of events in Tbilisi and Baku

Benyamin Poghosyan relects on ongoing domestic developments in neighbouring Georgia and Azerbaijan in this op-ed

The year 2019 was marked by domestic transformations in both Georgia and Azerbaijan. Georgia has seen the unprecedented rise  in street protests, and the clashes between demonstrators and riot police. The summer protests in Tbilisi triggered by the   appearance in Georgian parliament's speaker seat of Russian MP Gavrilov were calmed down only after the resignation of Speakerof Parliament, and  a promise by the ruling Georgian Dream party leader Bidzina Ivanishvili to amend the electoral law and move to a  fully proportional electoral system ahead of the crucial 2020 parliamentary elections. However, as a result   resistance from the sitting majoritarian MPs,  Parliament failed to pass the necessary constitutional amendments which triggered a new wave of street demonstrations. Many pundits argue that Parliament's negative vote was in fact a plot hatched by Mr. Ivanishvili  since a fully   proportional voting system did not guarantee a victory for Georgian Dream. Some believe that is was a real insurgency of majoritarian MPs, who had very little chance  to enter the Parliament through the new system. Many majoritarian MPs have tangible influence in Georgian regions, thus Mr. Ivanishvili could not afford to lose their support. However, regardless of the true reasons behind  Parliament's decision almost all opposition parties now are united against Georgian Dream and its leader Bidzina Ivanishvili and demand electoral reforms - suggesting the introduction of the so called "German model" as a compromise.   Georgian Dream argues that the German model does not comply with the constitution.

 Western diplomatic representatives made enormous efforts to bring the two sides to the negotiation table. As a result of two meetings held on November 30 and December 8, the Georgian Dream agreed to discuss the opposition proposals to create a multi-mandate election constituencies - 10 instead of the existing 73 suggesting, that from each 10 constituencies six-eight majoritarian MPs will be elected and as a result the country will again have 73 majoritarian MPs as now. The third meeting is scheduled to take place within two weeks. However, regardless of these meetings, most probably the domestic political crisis will continue well into 2020 and instability will be a prevailing pattern of Georgia till next Parliamentary elections scheduled for October. Meanwhile, Georgia is gradually becoming a hot spot not only for the US - Russia but also US - China competition. The fate of the Anaklia deep port construction, where Americans clearly prevented Chinese investors' efforts to be part of the project, was a clear sign of US - China rivalry. Meanwhile, Russia also carefully looks though Georgian domestic developments. On December 5 the Russian deputy foreign minister met with one of the leaders of the Georgian opposition, former Parliament speaker Nino Burjanadze in Moscow. The possible interference of external actors in Georgian domestic political and economic issues may further complicate the situation there.    

Meanwhile, another South Caucasian Republic, Azerbaijan is in the midst of significant political transformation dubbed by some experts as a "Silent revolution". In recent months many representatives close to the late President Heydar Aliyev, the leaders of the so called "Nakhijevan clan", were fired from their positions and replaced by   persons close to the First Vice President Mehriban Aliyeva. The decision to dissolve the Parliament and hold snap Parliamentary elections on February 9, 2020 was another move to finalize the transformation of Azerbaijani political elites. Given the recent successful visit of Mehriban Aliyeva to Moscow and her meeting with President Putin during which Russian President awarded her with a Russian state order, the Order of Friendship, we may  conclude that these domestic political transformations were being discussed, and were backed by the Kremlin.

Just four days after the Aliyeva - Putin meeting, President Ilham Aliyev made several anti-European statements during his public speech on the 100th anniversary of Baku State University. President Aliyev called the 2003 Rose and 2004 Orange revolutions as diseases and plagues and hailed Azerbaijan for being able to prevent foreign attempts to instigate revolution also there. President Aliyev stated that Azerbaijan will not integrate to Europe gripped by an economic crisis, where society is saying "Stop Islam" and does not see the difference between men and women. These statements mainly go in line with Russian official propaganda accusing the West of instigating revolutions in Post Soviet space and abandoning the traditional Christian values.

It's difficult to assess the real reasons for these dramatic changes in Azerbaijan. Some experts argue that the key is the economy, as due to the decline of oil prices and deteriorating economic situation Azerbaijan has to make real reforms and fight against shadow economy which means fight also against entrenched old elites who have vested interests in current   system which has left plenty of room for corruption. Others mention the "Velvet revolution" in Armenia in 2018 claiming that the Azerbaijani leadership wants to prevent  a "people's revolution" in Azerbaijan and therefore is forced to make substantial "top - down" changes. Given the growing role of Mehriban Aliyeva in Azerbaijan some inside and outside Azerbaijan predict the preparation of Mr. Aliyev's resignation in 2021-2022 and explain all changes as an effort to make a smooth transition from Mr. Aliyev to his wife. However, regardless of the true reasons behind the recent reshuffle in Azerbaijan, all accept that the events of autumn 2019 are comparable by their magnitude only with events in 2003 when Ilham Aliyev was elected President and even with events in 1993 when   President Elchibey was forced out of office and Heydar Aliyev came to power in Baku.

Both Georgia and Azerbaijan are in an active phase of domestic transformation. The final destination of the current political  crisis in Georgia is the 2020 Parliamentary elections which will define the future of Georgia for another four years. As for Azerbaijan, most probably, political transformations will continue beyond 2020 with unclear results as for now.      

source: Benyamin Poghosyan is the Founder and Chairman of the Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies in Yerevan. 

photo: Azerbaijani First Vice president Mehriban Aliyeva was in Moscow just before important personnel changes were announced in Azerbaijan. (picture courtesy of Azertac)

The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine and Russia could see European countries join the next round of peace negotiations, following talks between US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Thursday (November 12). However, conflicting positions over European military involvement, Ukraine’s territorial future and the continent’s security arrangements highlight the difficulties facing the diplomatic process. Speaking after the meeting, Witkoff said European participation would be an important development, describing the countries concerned as key partners. Kushner also indicated that Washington had noticed a shift in European attitudes and believed their involvement would not obstruct progress. In a statement published on X, he said the expanded discussions would address broader European security arrangements alongside territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine. The US envoys subsequently travelled to Dublin, where they met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a European summit. Zelenskyy welcomed the possibility of European participation and expressed hope that the negotiations would include measures to reduce tensions and establish ceasefires. He also reiterated the importance of European representation in decisions concerning the continent’s security. Moscow, however, has offered a more cautious interpretation of the proposed expansion. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, suggested that European countries should first reconsider their military assistance to Kyiv, arguing that their current actions demonstrated an unwillingness to pursue peace. Putin similarly called on Washington to work with its European allies to establish whether they genuinely wanted peace or continued confrontation with Russia. The Russian president also rejected the prospect of European peacekeeping troops being deployed to Ukraine following a potential agreement, describing such a presence as a continuation of the war. His position reflects wider disagreements over the future European security architecture, with Moscow seeking discussions on the continent's broader security arrangements, while European leaders insist that such negotiations cannot replace a settlement of the war. Simultaneously, Zelenskyy raised concerns about disruptions to Starshield, the US-made satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces. He described Washington’s discussions with Moscow about Europe's future security as unusual and warned against decisions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the diplomatic activity, fighting continued. Russian drone attacks killed two people in Ukraine's Sumy region and injured five in Rivne, while a separate attack in Russia's Belgorod region killed one person and injured four. Ukrainian agricultural company Kernel Holding also suspended operations at all its oilseed extraction facilities following repeated Russian attacks.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)