Opinion: US-Turkey relations are difficult but enduring

"The US needs Turkey to counter Russia in the Black Sea region, the Middle East, and the South Caucasus. Turkey can also be useful in the US strategy to contain China", argues Benyamin Poghosyan in this op-ed for commonspace.eu. However given the number of problems between the two countries US-Turkey relations may normalise, but they will continue to develop in the cooperation/competition framework, he argues.

US-Turkey relations have passed through significant transformations in the last decade.

President Obama started by seeking to build a "model partnership" with Turkey during his first term in office, but later he confronted Turkey over the growing authoritarianism of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The US decision to choose the Syrian Kurds as the main ally in their fight against ISIS in Syria triggered significant resentment from Turkey. Ankara perceives the Kurdish YPG fighters as a Syrian branch of Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), which was identified as a terrorist organisation by both the US and Turkey. Ankara repeatedly warned the US "not to use terrorists to fight other terrorists". The US refusal of Turkey's request to transfer technological know-how as part of the sale of Patriot air defence systems only added to Turkish grievances. The failed July 2016 military coup in Turkey, and lingering doubts among the top Turkish leadership that the US directly or indirectly was behind the coup, exacerbated relations further.

The election of President Trump seemed to create some hope for the normalisation of bilateral relations. Trump's publicly stated admiration for strong leaders was seen as potentially useful in establishing good personal chemistry between him and Erdogan. However, during Trump's presidency, US–Turkish relations lacked clarity and stability. Erdogan's decision to buy the Russian S-400 air defence system triggered a new crisis. The US cancelled the delivery of F-35 fighter jets to Turkey and kicked Turkish defence industry companies out of the project. President Trump gave the green light for Turkey's October 2019 incursion into Northeastern Syria, but immediately afterward, he sent the famous "Do not be a fool" letter to President Erdogan. By the end of 2020, bilateral relations were in a mess. Trump imposed sanctions on Turkey for purchasing the S-400 systems. The US Central Command continued its co-operation with YPG military units in Northeastern Syria, while Turkey was in multiple spats with other NATO allies such as Greece and France.

President Biden pledged to restore US leadership in the world, and to reinvigorate US alliances. "America is back" was the key slogan of President Biden's first major foreign policy speech at the 2021 virtual Munich security conference. Biden promised to protect NATO allies, and reinforced US iron-clad commitment to article 5 of the NATO treaty. He also pledged to counter any Russian threat accusing President Putin of attacking western democracies and undermining EU and NATO coherence. Biden also underscored the significance of democracy, and argued that democracy would and must prevail, and still deliver for people in a changing world.

The US needs Turkey to counter Russia in the Black Sea region, the Middle East, and the South Caucasus. Turkey can also be useful in the US strategy to contain China, given Turkey's growing Turkic ambitions and the US efforts to use Uyghur-related issues as critical leverage to pressure China. Meanwhile, President Erdogan is pursuing overt anti-liberal policies. The recent protests in Boğaziçi University and Erdogan's anti LGBTQ+ comments were clear signals that Erdogan and his AK party are drifting further away from Western liberal values.

Even if the Biden administration puts aside the issue of values and will elaborate its Turkey policy based on pure realism, it will not guarantee a quick normalisation of bilateral relations. President Erdogan has a vision of a strong and independent Turkey pursuing regional hegemony. Erdogan will never agree to bring back Turkey to the US in a junior ally position, merely receiving and executing US orders. According to Erdogan's vision, Turkey should have a right to choose its allies in different regions and different crises. Turkey may ally itself with the US only if there are overlapping interests, and the same applies to Turkey's relations with Russia, the EU, China, and other powers.

Nevertheless, the Turkish economy is in a terrible shape now, and Erdogan understands that if living standards continue to deteriorate, he may lose the upcoming presidential elections. Russia can not save the Turkish economy, and China may not want to do so even if it can. Erdogan needs some normalisation with the US to receive funding from the US-controlled international financial institutions.

This situation creates a bases for US-Turkey strategic bargaining. Turkey may give up its intention to buy the second S-400 system. Turkey's proposal to not fully activate its controversial Russian S-400 missile system offers a way forward to the new US administration to start negotiations over the issue that has severely strained bilateral ties.

In his recent interview with domestic media, Turkey's Defence Minister Hulusi Akar stated that Turkish was open to a deal similar to what NATO reached with Greece after Athens had bought S-300 – an older generation of the Russian defence system – in 1997. Simultaneously, Turkey has launched preliminary discussions with the US to buy the Patriot systems. Meanwhile, Turkish officials started linking the S-400 issue to the dispute over the US support to Syria's Kurdish fighters. Thus, the deal's potential contours can be Turkey's decision to cancel the purchase of the second unit of S-400 and not activate the already bought system, while the US may decrease its support to the Kurdish YPG units.

However, it will be problematic for the US to deliver the latter. In that case Syrian Kurds, through Russian mediation, will probably negotiate a deal with the Assad government to accept the Syrian central government’s authority and keep their autonomy. It will strengthen Iran's and Russia's positions in Syria, which are not in line with the US regional policy.

Regardless, Turkey needs a rapprochement with the US, and the Biden administration needs Turkey's support. Most probably, overlapping interests will facilitate some normalisation between the two states. However, as long as Erdogan is Turkey's leader, Ankara will pursue an independent foreign and domestic policy. The US-Turkey relations may normalise, but they will continue to develop in the co-operation/competition framework.  This is unlikely to change, at least until the next presidential elections in Turkey. 

Source: This op-ed was prepared for commonspace.eu by Benyamin Poghosyan, Founder and Chairman of the Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies in Yerevan.
Photo:  The US military base in Incirlik is one of the most important American overseas military facilities. Run as a joint US-Turkish base it is an example of the complicated, often awkward, but strategic relationship between the two NATO allies

 

The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.