Opinion: Kazakhstan’s "Yurts of Invincibility" are more than just a humanitarian initiative for Ukraine

In early January 2023, amid the freezing temperatures and power blackouts of Bucha - the Kyiv suburb now infamous for it being the location of Russian massacres of Ukrainian civilians in early 2022 - there popped up a Kazakh yurt where residents were served free traditional Kazakh food and tea, could keep warm and could charge their electronic devices. Soon after, another yurt appeared in downtown Kyiv. This initiative, dubbed “Yurts of Invincibility”, financed by the Kazakh entrepreneur Daulet Nurzhanov and supported by the Kazakh diaspora, is more than just a humanitarian initiative for Ukrainians, writes commonspace.eu Deputy Editor Patrick Norén. “They are a very telling symbol of change and a poignant message of defiance, strength and confidence for Kazakhs too.”

Whether it be military hardware, humanitarian aid, financial support, or private initiatives, many countries from across the world have pitched in to help Ukraine over the past year. That Kazakhstan is doing the same is in this regard nothing remarkable. The “Yurts of Invincibility” are another gesture of the newfound solidarity that much of the Eurasian space has discovered for the embattled democracy since February 2022, and one which expresses the desire and belief of many countries that Ukraine can and will prevail over Russia. For Ukraine, it is a small gesture but a powerful message that demonstrates that their Kazakh friends are thinking of them and supporting them in their hour of need. 

For Kazakhstan on the other hand, the “Yurts of Invincibility” in Bucha, Kyiv, and most recently Kharkiv, are a cultural symptom of the dramatic shift in Central Asia’s geopolitical reality that has occurred over the past year. Not only a humanitarian gesture to Ukrainians, the “Yurts of Invincibility” are a very telling symbol of change and a poignant message of defiance, strength and confidence for Kazakhs too.

The yurt is perhaps the most enduring symbol of nomadic cultures, for which Central Asia and Kazakhstan in particular is famous. Having suffered during Soviet times, traditional nomadic culture is being increasingly celebrated in Kazakhstan as the country tries to create a strong cultural future entirely separate from the memory of its former imperial oppressor. Kazakhstan’s Ukrainian yurts are also a message to Kazakhs that they can find “invincibility” in the face of an existential threat by rediscovering and reimagining their country’s traditional cultures.

In the words of California-based Kazakh academic Azamat Jurisbai: “Yurts of Invincibility are poignant manifestations of post-colonial solidarity between Kazakhstan and Ukraine [...] As a Qazaq person, I am happy that the traditional nomadic dwellings of my ancestors are going up in Ukraine.” Incidentally, precisely this idea has underpinned the post-Euromaidan Ukrainian cultural revival too.

In other words, seeing their Ukrainian friends’ suffering and recognising their shared struggle against Russian and Soviet rule, Kazakhstan has taken the humble yurt and imbued it with contemporary connotations of strength, defiance, independence, and, yes, invincibility. It is a pointed message for Kazakhs just as much as it is a humanitarian initiative for Ukrainians.

After the yurt in Bucha had been opened, Ukrainian media reported that the project had been supported by the Embassy of Kazakhstan in Kyiv, and that some employees had also come to offer their help. Speaking to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, volunteer Marat Darmenov said that diplomats had indeed come to help in an unofficial capacity as “concerned people”. 

The Russian response to this was somewhat predictable, once more betraying Moscow’s deep insecurities over things the rest of the world would regard as trivial. The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in a statement on 10 January that Moscow expected an official explanation from Kazakhstan about the yurts, “in order to avoid damaging the Russia-Kazakhstan strategic partnership and alliance.” 

One day later, the Kazakh Foreign Ministry spokesman Aibek Smadiyarov, responding to a question from an RFE/RL journalist, gave a response emblematic of the confidence with which Kazakhstan can operate internationally now the country is slipping out from underneath Moscow’s thumb.

“We do not see any problem in setting up a yurt. They set one up, and so what? A yurt is the traditional home of nomads, it is easy to assemble, can easily be moved to a new place and is environmentally friendly. This is probably why Kazakh businessmen chose this type of accommodation. This is a private initiative of Kazakh philanthropists who chose to help the Ukrainian people. We can neither comment on this nor forbid it. We don’t consider it necessary to give a special comment about this because we do not see any problem in setting up this yurt. On the contrary, we are proud that we have the yurt.”

The diplomatic tit-for-tat aside, this small Kazakh initiative taking a symbol of their traditional ancient culture and imbuing it with very different contemporary connotations - and ones that will rankle in Moscow too - is emblematic of the political and cultural changes that Russia’s failing invasion of Ukraine will herald for Kazakhstan and indeed Central Asia as a whole. One should be under no illusions that the Kazakh “Yurts of Invincibility” are in fact just as much a political and cultural message for Kazakhstan as they are a humanitarian initiative for Ukraine.

source: Patrick Norén is the Deputy Editor of commonspace.eu.
photo: Censor.net
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners.

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.