Opinion: Georgia has progressive LGBT laws, but society still has to catch up

Recent legislation has given rights and protection to Georgia's LGBT community, but society is still catching up, as Joseph d'Urso outlines in this special report for commonspace.eu

In many ways, being LGBT in Georgia is a big improvement on how it used to be. Progressive laws are in place and support groups are more visible than ever. The overall situation is much better than in neighbouring countries.

But according to activists, society is not yet as progressive as the laws, and in the run up to elections in October,  some politicians are whipping up homophobia to win votes.

Some politicians regularly make homophobic statements, and even the supposedly liberal parties do little to push back, says Natia Gvianishvili, director of Women's Initiatives Supporting Group, a rights group.

"We are treated as a ball being tossed around on the field, and everybody's trying to score their own goals, but these don't really affect us positively, they only affect us negatively."

She acknowledges there have been big improvements for LGBT people in the legal sphere, such as an anti-discrimination bill passed in 2014 despite opposition from the Church.

Progressive reforms like this are part of a comprehensive package of reforms that Georgia has been implementing as part of its policy of closer integration with the European Union. The government has been under attack from conservative religious groups and pro-Moscow parties for its non-discriminatory policies. Even so some activists are not convinced.

"These [progressive legal] changes occur because of a checklist we have, not because the government has an understanding of the sensitivity towards minority grounds," says Gvianishvili.

 "Often, politicians try to mobilise voters based on homophobia," says Levan Berianidze of LGBT Georgia.  The gay community see marriage as an unnecessary distraction rather than a feasible goal given the level of opposition in the country, he says in reference to an artificial debate that was introduced when a petition with over 200,000 signatures, calling for a referendum to amend Georgia's constitution to define marriage as being between a man and a woman was submitted. The measure was eventually vetoed by President Margvelashvili on the ground that such an interpretation already existed in Georgia's civil code.

Beka Gabadadze is a social worker for Tanadgoma, a charity providing health services to LGBT people in Tbilisi. He works with sex workers and other vulnerable people in the capital.

LGBT datings apps which are popular in western countries have not made great inroads in Georgia, he says, because people are worried about being found by neighbours or relatives. Many use apps such as Grindr, but show other body parts such as their torso instead of their face, he says, although norms are shifting.

"Two years ago when I downloaded Grindr there were three faces, one was me, one was my colleague ... now there are 11, so something is changing!"

Gabadadze is keen not to be too negative about his country, and strongly encourages LGBT tourists to come to Georgia.

"It's not that somebody will kill you if they hear that you are gay, we don't have that kind of situation... if we compare with Armenia and Azerbaijan, attitudes are not as homophobic."

As well as its work on sexual health, his organisation also runs workshops helping parents come to terms with the fact their child is LGBT. His own mother attended one.

"Two weeks ago my father's friend died and I went to the cemetery, and people were chatting about me," he said. "My mother is living in [second city] Kutaisi, and people are bullying her. People think that if woman has a gay son, it's her mistake."

May 17, International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia (IDAHO Day) is a special day for Georgia's LGBT community. It is always marked by small protests and larger counter-protests. In 2013, activists were beaten up. Since then, rallies have been lower key.

Hate crimes are a big problem, says Lika Jalagania a human rights lawyer. Two years ago, Sabi Beriani, a transgender woman, was stabbed to death and burned in her apartment. The culprit was charged with property damage, not a transphobic hate crime.

People who deviate from traditional styles, such as a man wearing earrings or a woman with short hair, can also fall victim to violence whether they are gay or not, says Jalagania.

Violence is often just as bad in the family as it is in the street, she says. "If you're trying to come out in Batumi, it's like suicide."

In rankings compiled by Rainbow Europe, an NGO, Georgia comes 31st out of 49 European countries for its LGBT laws and policies, above Italy and Romania.

The bottom four countries in the list are Georgia's four neighbours, Turkey, Armenia, Russia and Azerbaijan. "Compared to them we're not that bad," says Natia Gvianishvili, although she reiterates that laws and social values are two very different things.

She is optimistic about her country's future direction, as long as its leaders keep aiming west. "As long as our direction is towards the EU, we'll keep improving."

source: This special report was prepared by jospeh d'Urso for commonspace.eu

photo 1: Lika Jalagania, Levan Berianidze, and Natia Gvianishvili

photo 2 Beka Gabadadze, a social worker for Tanadogma, an LGBT charity

 

 

 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine and Russia could see European countries join the next round of peace negotiations, following talks between US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Thursday (November 12). However, conflicting positions over European military involvement, Ukraine’s territorial future and the continent’s security arrangements highlight the difficulties facing the diplomatic process. Speaking after the meeting, Witkoff said European participation would be an important development, describing the countries concerned as key partners. Kushner also indicated that Washington had noticed a shift in European attitudes and believed their involvement would not obstruct progress. In a statement published on X, he said the expanded discussions would address broader European security arrangements alongside territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine. The US envoys subsequently travelled to Dublin, where they met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a European summit. Zelenskyy welcomed the possibility of European participation and expressed hope that the negotiations would include measures to reduce tensions and establish ceasefires. He also reiterated the importance of European representation in decisions concerning the continent’s security. Moscow, however, has offered a more cautious interpretation of the proposed expansion. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, suggested that European countries should first reconsider their military assistance to Kyiv, arguing that their current actions demonstrated an unwillingness to pursue peace. Putin similarly called on Washington to work with its European allies to establish whether they genuinely wanted peace or continued confrontation with Russia. The Russian president also rejected the prospect of European peacekeeping troops being deployed to Ukraine following a potential agreement, describing such a presence as a continuation of the war. His position reflects wider disagreements over the future European security architecture, with Moscow seeking discussions on the continent's broader security arrangements, while European leaders insist that such negotiations cannot replace a settlement of the war. Simultaneously, Zelenskyy raised concerns about disruptions to Starshield, the US-made satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces. He described Washington’s discussions with Moscow about Europe's future security as unusual and warned against decisions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the diplomatic activity, fighting continued. Russian drone attacks killed two people in Ukraine's Sumy region and injured five in Rivne, while a separate attack in Russia's Belgorod region killed one person and injured four. Ukrainian agricultural company Kernel Holding also suspended operations at all its oilseed extraction facilities following repeated Russian attacks.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)