Tunisian turmoil continues as presidency sacks head of national television channel and more officials

The Tunisian presidency sacked the CEO of the national television station Wataniya on Wednesday (28 July), after an activist and a journalism union representative were briefly denied access to the studios, where they were supposed to speak on a program.

Amira Mohamed, vice president of the Tunisian journalists union (SNJT), said she was stopped at the entrance by a security agent who was waiting for authorisation from the channel's management to allow her in.

"The CEO of Wataniya told me that he had received instructions from a military official not to allow guests into the TV headquarters," added human rights activist Bassem Trifi. However, the defence ministry and the presidency denied these allegations, saying they had given no such instructions.

The channel's CEO, Lassaad Dahech, accused of trying to cause trouble by restricting access to the channel, was sacked a few hours later. He was immediately replaced by a journalist who had previously held this interim post, Awatef Dali.

Dahech's dismissal by the presidency comes after that of the prime minister, Hichem Mechichi, on Sunday (25 July), followed by his defence minister, Ibrahim Bartagi, and the government spokesperson, Hasna Ben Slimane, who was also minister of the civil service and acting minister of justice, the next day. On Wednesday, President Kaïs Saïed also issued decrees sacking a long list of senior government officials, including the army's chief prosecutor.

Although Saïed promised to defend and protect civil liberties, the sacking of Dahech increased fears about the respect of freedoms in the young democracy, in particular after the closure of the offices of the Qatari channel Al-Jazeera by the police on Monday. In a statement published later that night, the channel said it viewed the police's raid as “an attack on press freedom”.

Saïed says his suspension of parliament and subsequent actions were justified under article 80 of the constitution to counter an "imminent threat", allowing the head of state to take the unspecified exceptional measures in such a situation. For months now, Tunisia has been facing economic and political crises aggravated by the health crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.

 

source: commonspace.eu with France24 (Île-de-France), AL Jazeera (Doha) and agencies.
photo: Police officers on motorcycles in Tunis; courtesy of Al Jazeera, Doha.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
International Election Observation Mission finds that Armenians were offered a genuine choice against a backdrop of direct foreign pressure and uneven campaign opportunities

International Election Observation Mission finds that Armenians were offered a genuine choice against a backdrop of direct foreign pressure and uneven campaign opportunities

Farah Karimi, Special Co-ordinator and leader of the short-term OSCE observer mission, said that: “The concentration of arrests and criminal prosecutions against opposition figures contributed to perceptions of selective justice, while a polarized media landscape, inflammatory rhetoric, misinformation, and persistent foreign pressure and interference challenged Armenia’s democratic resilience and the integrity of public debate. This underscores the importance of continued efforts to strengthen democratic institutions, safeguard fundamental freedoms, and foster public trust in democratic processes. ” Damien Cottier, Head of the delegation of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, argued that “The Armenian elections took place in a particularly tense geopolitical context, with direct foreign interference. In particular, pressure and threats from Russian authorities reached an unprecedented and worrying level.” Janez Lenarčič, head of the election observation mission from the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, stated that “Armenia’s voters were given – and took – the opportunity to make a genuine choice in a professionally managed election process and a vibrant and pluralistic, if often highly polarized campaign. “Unfortunately, they had to make that choice against the backdrop of unprecedented foreign interference and pressure, in the form of punitive trade measures and day-by-day threats of further negative consequences contingent on which choice they made”. == click image to read full report

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)