Tunisian turmoil continues as presidency sacks head of national television channel and more officials

The Tunisian presidency sacked the CEO of the national television station Wataniya on Wednesday (28 July), after an activist and a journalism union representative were briefly denied access to the studios, where they were supposed to speak on a program.

Amira Mohamed, vice president of the Tunisian journalists union (SNJT), said she was stopped at the entrance by a security agent who was waiting for authorisation from the channel's management to allow her in.

"The CEO of Wataniya told me that he had received instructions from a military official not to allow guests into the TV headquarters," added human rights activist Bassem Trifi. However, the defence ministry and the presidency denied these allegations, saying they had given no such instructions.

The channel's CEO, Lassaad Dahech, accused of trying to cause trouble by restricting access to the channel, was sacked a few hours later. He was immediately replaced by a journalist who had previously held this interim post, Awatef Dali.

Dahech's dismissal by the presidency comes after that of the prime minister, Hichem Mechichi, on Sunday (25 July), followed by his defence minister, Ibrahim Bartagi, and the government spokesperson, Hasna Ben Slimane, who was also minister of the civil service and acting minister of justice, the next day. On Wednesday, President Kaïs Saïed also issued decrees sacking a long list of senior government officials, including the army's chief prosecutor.

Although Saïed promised to defend and protect civil liberties, the sacking of Dahech increased fears about the respect of freedoms in the young democracy, in particular after the closure of the offices of the Qatari channel Al-Jazeera by the police on Monday. In a statement published later that night, the channel said it viewed the police's raid as “an attack on press freedom”.

Saïed says his suspension of parliament and subsequent actions were justified under article 80 of the constitution to counter an "imminent threat", allowing the head of state to take the unspecified exceptional measures in such a situation. For months now, Tunisia has been facing economic and political crises aggravated by the health crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.

 

source: commonspace.eu with France24 (Île-de-France), AL Jazeera (Doha) and agencies.
photo: Police officers on motorcycles in Tunis; courtesy of Al Jazeera, Doha.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)