In Tunisia, President Kaïs Saïed announces the dissolution of the Supreme Judicial Council

On Sunday 6 February, Tunisian President Kaïs Saied took a further step in the dismantling of the institutional structure resulting from the 2014 Constitution, by announcing the dissolution of the Supreme Judicial Council. He stated that one of the institutions guaranteeing the country's judicial independence "has become a thing of the past."

Saied, who had dismissed the government and suspended parliament last July, attributed his new decision to the “corruption and bias” existing in the judicial council. This unconstitutional measure would be justified by the delay and obstacles in the handling of certain cases, according to Kaïs Saied, who is particularly concerned about the assassination of former Tunisian leftists Belaïd and Brahmi, who were killed in 2013 while campaigning against the government in charge at the time. Coincidentally or not, this decision comes on the eve of the anniversary of the death of Belaïd, on 6 February 2013. This judicial body has indeed been the subject of much criticism, notably in mid-2021, when the President of the Court of Cassation Rached and the former public prosecutor Akremi accused each other of corruption, terrorism and money laundering.

However, after years which saw the judiciary controlled by the dictatorial regime of Zine El-Abidine ben Ali (1987-2011), the creation of the Supreme Judicial Council was considered essential in the 2014 Constitution. This council, an independent authority established in 2016 to appoint judges, is composed of 45 judges, two-thirds of whom are elected by Parliament, and the remaining third is constituted by the newly elected judges. 

The Supreme Judicial Council's response was swift, and on Sunday (6 February) it rejected the dissolution "in the absence of a legal and constitutional framework" allowing Kaïs Saïed to do so. In the same statement, it was announced that the members of the council would continue to serve. 

President Kaïs Saïed's supporters praise his efforts to get rid of a corrupt and inefficient system, while his critics and political opponents accuse him of heading towards a form of authoritarianism that is detrimental to Tunisian democracy.

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with Le Monde, DW News and other media outlets
Picture: President Kaïs Saïed dissolves top justice watchdog; Twitter: @almayadeen_es


 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.