Task Force Takuba, the EU's mission in the Sahel, is not going according to plan

The foreign ministers of Mali, Mauritania, Niger, and Chad failed to agree on the terms for a joint ministerial summit with the European Union and have instead chosen to hold bilateral talks with EU High Representative Josep Borrell.

The cancellation followed a series of coups in Mali and Burkina Faso, which has put into question the main European military tool in the Sahel region, the Takuba force. Task Force Takuba was created with much fanfare, and after a lot of French insistence, in March 2020 to help Mali and its neighbours in the West African Sahel fight militants linked to the Islamic State and al-Qaeda, who have taken over large parts of their territory. 

The growing instability in the region, combined with the increasing unpopularity of the French military presence in the Sahel, now appears to have weakened the role and influence of the European Union in the region. Earlier this week a contingent of Danish Special forces was asked to leave immediately on its arrival in Burkina Faso, where the new military authorities claimed that its deployment was not co-ordinated with them, a claim the Danish government has strenously denied

Three days after the announcement of the coup in Burkina Faso, local and European media are still not sure about what has happened to ousted President Kaboré, adding a further complication to relations.  On Wednesday (26 January) Borell called for “the immediate release of all illegally detained persons, starting with the President [of Burkina Faso, Roch] Kaboré himself", saying this was essential”, according to a statement issued by the European External Action Service.  

Moreover, the presence of the Wagner Group in Mali, a significant Russian mercenary group with close connections to the Kremlin, has further complicated the French and European presence in the Sahel. Moscow has understood that as Islamist militants grew in strength in the region, local sentiment would harden against European involvement which is perceived as having failed to stop them. Yevgeny Prigozhin, head of the Wagner Group, even compared the recent coup in Burkina Faso to a "new era of decolonisation", a reference to the French colonial past in the country.

In the same statement last night, Borell expressed "major concern following the proven deployment of Russian mercenaries in Mali”, highlighting the “significant risks that this poses to the civilian population”, before recalling that the methods of operation of this group were "incompatible with our collective efforts in favour of security and development".

In recent days, Russia’s growing influence has become apparent by Burkinabe coup supporters’ hoisting of the Russian tricolore, seen as an act of defiance against European and French influence in the region.

Regarding the Danish troops in Mali, the European representatives of the states contributing to the Takuba Task Force issued a joint statement on Wednesday evening condemning the junta's position: “We, the international partners committed to supporting Mali and its people in their efforts to achieve sustainable peace and stability and combat terrorism, deeply regret the statement by the Malian transitional authorities {…} alleging that the deployment of the Danish contingent in the Task Force Takuba has been made without a proper legal basis and consent from the Malian government”, wrote the fifteen states, whilst further calling on the Malian authorities to “quickly remedy to this situation”.

Sources: CommonSpace.eu, with Euractiv, Reuters and other media outlets
Picture: Supporters of Burkina Faso’s Military coup ; Twitter: @Henry_Wilkins
 
 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.