Suspected sabotage hits undersea infrastructure between Finland and Estonia

On Tuesday (10 October), the Finnish government announced an alarming incident involving critical underwater infrastructure linking Finland and Estonia, which has been damaged under suspicious circumstances. This underwater infrastructure includes a gas pipeline and a telecommunications cable laid under the Baltic Sea. The incident has raised concerns, with sabotage being a plausible cause, and raises further questions about security in the strategic waters of the Baltic Sea, which are at the centre of geopolitical tensions.

In an immediate response to the damage, operations on the Balticconnector gas pipeline were halted early on Sunday (8 October) amid indications of a gas leak in the 77-kilometre (48-mile) pipeline. In a statement, Gasgrid Finland, the company that oversees the pipeline, said it expected the repair to take several months.

Image
The Balticconnector marine gas pipeline opened in 2020 between Paldiski, Estonia and Inkoo, Finland. OpenStreetMap
The Balticconnector marine gas pipeline opened in 2020 between Paldiski, Estonia and Inkoo, Finland. OpenStreetMap

NATO, aware of the security implications, has extended its support. In a statement, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg pledged to share relevant information on the incident with affected Allies, underlining the Alliance's cooperative security framework in the Baltic region.

The manifestation of a significant rupture was indicated by the sudden drop in pipeline pressure, a Baltic energy official told Reuters on condition of anonymity. However, the exact cause is still under investigation.

Commenting on the incident on Tuesday, Finnish President Sauli Niinistö highlighted the possibility of "outside activities", although the exact cause is still under investigation. The ongoing investigation is a joint effort by Finnish and Estonian authorities to identify the cause and extent of the damage.

“It is likely that the damage to both the gas pipeline and the communication cable is the result of external activity" Niinistö said on X (formerly Twitter), on Tuesday. “The cause of the damage is not yet clear; the investigation continues.”

The Finnish President said the authorities were 'in contact with our allies and partners' and that the country was 'prepared and our readiness is good', adding that the incident had 'no effect on our security of supply'.

To draw a parallel, this disruption is reminiscent of an incident in 2022, when the Nord Stream gas pipelines linking Russia and Germany across the Baltic Sea suffered explosions that were identified as deliberate sabotage. 

The pipeline route, from Inkoo in Finland to Paldiski in Estonia, crosses the Gulf of Finland and extends into Russian territorial waters, culminating in the port of St Petersburg. 

Maximiliaan van Lange, Senior Research Associate at commonspace.eu, says that the recurring episodes of potential sabotage highlight the vulnerability and strategic importance of the underwater infrastructure in the Baltic Sea region, requiring increased vigilance and cooperative security measures to protect these critical assets. The proximity to Russian waters adds a layer of complexity to the region's security paradigm.

source: commonspace.eu with agencies
photo: Vessel lays Balticconnector Pipeline. Allseas.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.