State refineries in China distance themselves from Russian oil

Major state oil refiners in China have halted new oil contracts with Russian companies in a move designed to limit retribution from the United States and European nations who have implemented harsh sanctions against Moscow. Nevertheless, the Chinese refiners will honour existing contracts. The decision comes as differences arise between Beijing's political line towards Moscow, and the economic relationship between the two Eurasian countries.

CNOOC, PetroChina, Sinochem, and Sinopec, Asia’s largest oil refiner, have all stopped entering into new Russian oil contracts for the month of May. Oil contracts for the month of April will continue uninterrupted. The United States and the European Union have placed sanctions on Russia’s top oil and gas exporters such as Rosneft and Gazprom Neft. The Chinese companies are worried about dealing with these sanctioned firms. An unnamed source said that the companies “are cautious as their actions could be seen as representing the Chinese government and none of them wants to be singled out as a buyer of Russian oil.” Another reason for the Chinese oil refiners’ decision could be the instability surrounding the Russian currency, as well as payments to Russia. The ruble dropped to a historic low of 140 against the US dollar in early March. It has now rebounded to 80 against the dollar.

On a political level, China and Russia have professed close ties. China has called for an end to what they see as illegal western sanctions and has maintained its stance of a “no limits” relationship with Russia. Moscow’s Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov, attended a conference in China at the end of March where he met with Beijing’s Foreign Minister, Wang Yi, for bilateral talks. On the other hand, Chinese state companies are slowly distancing themselves from Russian firms. While the Chinese oil refiners' decision to stop oil contracts for May is one example, it is not the only decision that is separating companies from the two countries. One of the oil refiners, Sinopec, paused plans for a new petrochemical plant in China, and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) based in China pulled funding for projects in Russia and Belarus.

Russia has not yet placed pressure on China to provide economic and financial support which allows the Chinese government to steer clear of western sanctions while still presenting a united anti-Western political bloc. However, as sanctions begin to bite and the EU warns of a long, protracted war in the Donbas, Beijing’s “no limits” relationship with Moscow may finally be put to the test.

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with Reuters (London), Bloomberg (New York), and other media agencies.
Picture: Worker at a Chinese gas refinery (CNS)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.