Skirmishes and tense calm in the Sahara

Sporadic clashes continue in Western Sahara between the Polisario Front and the Moroccan forces along the 2700 km security lines, two weeks after the border incident of El Guerguerat near Mauritania. The Polisario forces claim they attacked Moroccan positions at least four times. The UN claims to have received reports of a shooting. On its turn, the Moroccan army said it retaliated and cleared security threats.  

Morocco has the backing of several Arab countries while the EU and many African nations adhered to neutrality and called for restraint. The issue of the Sahara remains contentious among various interested parties. Some politicians, notably in Spain and South Africa, seem to be supportive of the Saharawi cause.

The end of the ceasefire opened a debate among the Spanish coalition government formed by the socialist PSOE and the leftist Podemos party. The position of Spain, defended by Foreign Minister, Arancha González Laya (PSOE), on Western Sahara is to return to the ceasefire to promote a political negotiation that allows reaching a definitive solution. That is, to return to the situation before November 13.

However, Deputy Prime Minister, Pablo Iglesias (Podemos) has asked the government to guarantee the holding of a self-determination referendum for the former Spanish province. The statements have not been well received in Morocco, so the Spanish president, Pedro Sánchez, will probably travel to the African country in December in an attempt to calm things down, according to the Spanish press.

The Sahara clashes are not easy to trace because of the extensive region and the shifting frontlines. Winning the war in the Sahara can be costly and time exhaustive. Any continuation poses the risk of creating a security vacuum. A full-blown war will turn into attrition and open the space for further armament and possible infiltration of extremists.  

The Sahara is nonetheless of important economic and geostrategic value to Morocco.  Phosphate extraction, fishing activities and possible oil and gas deposits are some of the prospects in the Sahara. In additions, a coast of 1100 km can give an important geostrategic value to Morocco. Nonetheless, Morocco's main argument is the historic and legal basis of sovereignty over the Sahara. 

In the Sahara itself, the Polisario's cause is not taken for granted as several Saharawis supported the operations by the Moroccan army. There was no progress for the referendum over the Sahara due to differences on who should vote and how the referendum is ought to be held. Several Algerian and Moroccan scholars called for a ceasefire and swift resolution. 

Source: commonspace.eu with agencies. 
Photo: A van nearby the clashes area with a Moroccan security outpost in the background (Al Quds al Arabi). 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Egypt rejects Israeli "offer" for an exit only Rafah checkpoint in Gaza

Egypt rejects Israeli "offer" for an exit only Rafah checkpoint in Gaza

Egypt has rejected an Israeli "offer" for opening for exit only the Rafah checkpoint in Gaza. According to the Egyptian State Information Service, Egyptian authorities refuted on Wednesday afternoon reports that Israel claims it will open the Rafah crossing, the only lifeline for Gaza to the outside world, but only for those wishing to leave the besieged coastal enclave.  Citing an Egyptian official, the service stated that ''any agreement to open the crossing will cover both entry and exit, in line with US President Donald Trump's plan for humanitarian and political arrangements following the ceasefire.'' Cairo reaffirmed its adherence to the plan and UN Security Council Resolution 2803, including the right of return for Palestinians and maintaining two-way operations at the crossing. Earlier in the day, Israel's Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) announced that the Rafah crossing would reopen ''within the next few days,'' marking the first such move since February 2025. According to the statement, departures would require prior Israeli security approval and would follow mechanisms previously implemented under EU supervision. Notably, the statement made no mention of the entry of humanitarian aid, which continues to flow through the Kerem Shalom crossing. A Palestinian official also echoed the Egyptian denial of Israel's claim. The announced agreements stress that no Palestinians will be forced to leave Gaza. Those who choose to travel will have the right to return, while humanitarian aid will continue through UN agencies, the International Red Cross and Crescent, and other independent organisations. A European Union official, who requested anonymity and is familiar with the matter, told TNA that the EU has received no official notification from Israel regarding new arrangements, stressing that "no changes exist beyond the January agreements, and we await Israel's formal approval for crossing operations under the Trump plan. "Reopening the crossing will follow mechanisms jointly supervised by the EU and the Palestinian Authority to ensure oversight and transparency, according to the EU official.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Egypt rejects Israeli "offer" for an exit only Rafah checkpoint in Gaza

Egypt rejects Israeli "offer" for an exit only Rafah checkpoint in Gaza

Egypt has rejected an Israeli "offer" for opening for exit only the Rafah checkpoint in Gaza. According to the Egyptian State Information Service, Egyptian authorities refuted on Wednesday afternoon reports that Israel claims it will open the Rafah crossing, the only lifeline for Gaza to the outside world, but only for those wishing to leave the besieged coastal enclave.  Citing an Egyptian official, the service stated that ''any agreement to open the crossing will cover both entry and exit, in line with US President Donald Trump's plan for humanitarian and political arrangements following the ceasefire.'' Cairo reaffirmed its adherence to the plan and UN Security Council Resolution 2803, including the right of return for Palestinians and maintaining two-way operations at the crossing. Earlier in the day, Israel's Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) announced that the Rafah crossing would reopen ''within the next few days,'' marking the first such move since February 2025. According to the statement, departures would require prior Israeli security approval and would follow mechanisms previously implemented under EU supervision. Notably, the statement made no mention of the entry of humanitarian aid, which continues to flow through the Kerem Shalom crossing. A Palestinian official also echoed the Egyptian denial of Israel's claim. The announced agreements stress that no Palestinians will be forced to leave Gaza. Those who choose to travel will have the right to return, while humanitarian aid will continue through UN agencies, the International Red Cross and Crescent, and other independent organisations. A European Union official, who requested anonymity and is familiar with the matter, told TNA that the EU has received no official notification from Israel regarding new arrangements, stressing that "no changes exist beyond the January agreements, and we await Israel's formal approval for crossing operations under the Trump plan. "Reopening the crossing will follow mechanisms jointly supervised by the EU and the Palestinian Authority to ensure oversight and transparency, according to the EU official.