Russia busy keeping Central Asian states in line as Ukraine crisis unfolds

Image removed.

 

As the Russia-Ukraine conflict unfolds, the Kremlin is busy ensuring that Central Asian countries stay in line with the Russian position, despite the considerable discomfort that can be seen at level of both the governing elites, as well as the populations at large.

Russian president Vladimir Putin appears to be leading the arms twisting exercise. On Saturday morning he spoke on the phone with the president of Kyrgyzstan, Sadyr Zhaparov. The Kremlin confirmed that the main conversation was Ukraine .

Overall, countries in Central Asia continue to remain quiet. While Russian officials and diplomats have visited Tajikistan to discuss the current military operation in Ukraine, there have been no official statements from Tajikistan nor any other Central Asian nation, where political analysts say that they favour neutrality.

The Chairman of the Federation Council of the Russian Federal Assembly, Valentina Matviyenko, in her visit to Tajikistan, met with Rustam Emomali, Speaker of the National Assembly of the Republic and son of the current president, 24 February. Matviyenko subsequently made a statement, “The military operation announced by the Russian president is aimed at stopping military operations there, and there is no other way to do it.” However, Tajikistan did not make an official statement regarding the current situation. Tajik opposition activist, Dodojon Atovulloyev, said that if the Kremlin asks the government to make a statement, “[Tajikistan] will naturally be in a very difficult situation.” Tajikistan’s Foreign Ministry has called for its citizens in Ukraine to adhere to the curfews and contact the embassy in Kyiv if necessary.

Similarly, Kazakhstan has not made an official statement on the conflict. Prime Minister Alikhan Smailov reported to President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev on 24 February on the measures the government is taking to minimize the economic fallout from the crisis. The Tenge, Kazakhstan’s currency, lost 13% in value despite the $137 million provided by the National Bank of Kazakhstan. Nonetheless, protestors in Kazakhstan have been making their voice heard. Around a dozen activists gathered around the Russian Consulate to protest, however nearly all were detained by Kazakh police.

The debate regarding neutrality in this matter is beginning to be felt around the region. In Uzbekistan, which has also not made an official statement, political analyst, Kamoliddin Rabbimov highlighted how the division between those supportive of Russia and those supportive of Ukraine map onto existing political faultlines regarding Uzbekistan's statehood. Rabbimov noted that anti-Kremlin sentiment in Uzbekistan is growing year after year. The governments of Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan have not come out with any official statements on the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

While the countries may feel some unease about the intervention, the lack of statements or any criticism of the Kremlin is in line with expectations, given the close military, political, and economic ties all the nations share with Russia.

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with Eurasianet (New York), The Astana Times (Nur-Sultan), and VOA News (Washington D.C.)
Picture: President Tokayev in meeting with Prime Minister Smailov (Akorda)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.