Rebalancing in Central Africa

On Sunday, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda and his Ugandan counterpart President Yoweri Museveni met in Kampala for a series of bilateral talks. The two met to further the idea of a regional military force to underpin the East African Community (EAC) and its stabilising efforts in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

According to the state-broadcaster, Rwanda Broadcasting Agency, the president arrived in Kampala on Sunday to attend the 48th birthday party of Museveni’s son, Muhoozi Kainerugaba. Kainerugaba was reportedly crucial in the thawing of Rwanda-Ugandan relations, spearheading the opening of their mutual border in January of this year.

Since the accession of the DRC to the EAC, the two heads of state have been forced to make amends. The UN has accused the two countries of contributing to the destabilization of the DRC by supporting insurgent rebel groups such as M23. Relations soured in 2019 as both governments accused the other of sabotage, leading to Rwanda’s sealing of its border with Uganda, halting all trade. 

Both Uganda and Rwanda once supported the Tutsi ‘March 23 Movement’,  with its officials moving freely in Uganda and its fighters being recruited in Rwanda, according to a group of experts in the UNSC Sanctions Committee. Both countries have continuously denied any involvement with the rebel group.

The DRC, a mineral-rich country, has suffered instability since achieving its independence in 1960. Its neighbouring countries to the East have contributed; ousting Mobutu in 1997 and contributing to the loss of 2.5 million lives from 1997-2001. The UN accused the warring parties of prolonging the war in order to plunder the country of its resources. According to government figures, gold continues to be Uganda’s second-most valuable export, after coffee, despite having little domestic production.

Uganda, however, has recently swapped its allegiance, supporting the Congolese government through a joint operation against the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), an ISIS-affiliated group active in the Eastern Kivu region. The DRC now wants to “look at Rwanda as a partner country, as [they] look at Uganda”, says government spokesman Patrick Muyaya.

The EAC, made up of seven countries, met last week in Nairobi to discuss plans for an expanded military operation in the DRC.  According to Kenyan news outlet, The Standard, rebel leaders were also invited to attend talks on Friday. Chairman of the EAC, Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta, was to hold negotiations between the two warring parties after a peak in violence earlier this month. The EAC is yet to communicate any of its results.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Sunday tweeted in support of the regional initiative, stating that the “UN fully supports the initiative by the East African countries to bring peace in the Eastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the neighbouring countries”.

Sources: The Standard (Nairobi), Monitor (Kampala), Newsweek, africanews, The East African, Al Jazeera, Voice of America, ABC News
Photo: Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, left, and his Rwandan counterpart Paul Kagame. Source: Reuters.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)