Menu
Latest
Menu
Latest
News

Putin does not want to hear the words "Nagorno-Karabakh conflict" any more

14 November 2020

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday (13 November) chaired a meeting of his top security advisors to discuss the humanitarian aspects of the recent war in Nagorno-Karabakh. During the meeting, the President announced the creation of an Interdepartmental Center for Humanitarian Response in order to facilitate the solution of humanitarian issues and the restoration of civil infrastructure in Nagorno-Karabakh.

The meeting was attended by Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Emergencies Minister Yevgeny Zinichev and FSB Director Alexander Bortnikov.

However, the president started the meeting by insisting that the term "Nagorno-Karabakh conflict" should not be used any more.

"We have met to discuss the situation that has taken shape in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone. I hope we will no longer use the term - 'the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict'."

Referring to the humanitarian situation the president added, I hope that we will soon move on to the discussion of other issues but one of them is fairly topical."

Lavrov on international contacts

During the meeting, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov reported about the contacts that Russia has had with the international community following the signing of the agreement to stop the Karabakh War by the leaders of Armenia, Azerbaija and Russia. Lavrov said,

We briefed our colleagues in detail, primarily from France and the United States as co-chairs - together with us - of the OSCE Minsk Group.

I spoke with the Minister of Foreign Affairs of France and explained to him in detail the situation and the efforts that you made. We also spoke with our American colleagues. In New York, the UN Security Council was fully informed of the efforts that were undertaken by Russia and led to the conclusion of the November 9 agreement.

We are also in contact with international organizations that are involved in humanitarian activities. These are primarily the Office of the [UN] High Commissioner for Refugees, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs and the UN Development Program.

All these structures have their presence in the region, but not directly in Nagorno-Karabakh. And now, in contacts with our Armenian and Azerbaijani colleagues, at the request of the UN structures, we are agreeing so that they can deploy their presence directly in Nagorno-Karabakh.

In the event of such a deployment, the UN is very interested in coordinating its actions with our peacekeepers, with our border guards and with those who will solve humanitarian tasks along the line of the mission that Russia is carrying out.

In addition to the UN structures and in addition to the requests that come from them, namely, to provide access to Karabakh to those in need, it is also important for them to have accurate data on how many refugees, how many displaced persons have moved where. It is also important for us to assess this on our own and, of course, also in contact with the Azerbaijani and Armenian sides.

Outside the UN, there is also the International Committee of the Red Cross, which has been working in the region for a long time, it had a permanent presence for many years in Stepanakert itself. After the outbreak of hostilities, they were forced to evacuate this presence to Yerevan, now they have returned there and are again resuming their work there, they are also interested in establishing coordination with our representatives.

The President of the International Committee of the Red Cross Peter Maurer will be in the Russian Federation on Tuesday, we expect to organize a meeting for him not only at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but also with our military, with representatives of the Ministry of Emergency Situations and border guards.

Russia to deploy additional 150 personnel from Ministry of Emergency Situations

During the meeting it also emerged that Russia will deploy as well as 150 personnel from its Ministry of Emergency Situations rescue centers, as well as 17 pieces of equipment, and was on standby to deploy an an emergency hospital and 50 personnel, including medical workers. 

Putin announces the creation of a Humanitarian Response Centre

Concluding the meeting, president Putin announced the creation of a Humanitarian Response Centre

"In order to help the residents of the region in solving the most pressing problems, I consider it necessary to create an Interdepartmental Center for Humanitarian Response. Its work will involve the resources of the Ministry of Defense, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the border service of the FSB of Russia, and other departments of the Russian Federation.

The center will be engaged in operational support of the process of returning refugees to their places of permanent residence; interaction with state bodies of Azerbaijan and Armenia to restore civil infrastructure and create conditions for normal life in Nagorno-Karabakh; coordination of the work of government agencies and - I hope, I really count on it - of public organizations to provide humanitarian assistance to residents of areas affected by the war; providing assistance to the government bodies of Azerbaijan and Armenia, if, of course, they need it - and it seems to me that such assistance will be very useful, bearing in mind the complex prehistory of relations between the republics - in establishing interaction with international humanitarian organizations and among themselves ...

I ask the Russian Foreign Ministry to continue its work on informing the partners in the OSCE Minsk Group about the decisions taken, as well as the International Red Cross, the Red Cross Committee, it is necessary to inform the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. We need to establish constructive full-fledged work with these structures, including with the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. UNESCO - we need to get in touch with them, with our colleagues from UNESCO, and I really count on their support.

I express the hope that the activities of the [Interdepartmental] Center will receive full support from all these structures.

We also count on the contribution and assistance from the Commonwealth of Independent States. We will maintain close interaction with all possible participants in this important work."

source: commonspace.eu with the press service of the president of Russia

photo: Russian president Vladimir Putin chairing a meeting on the humanitarian response to the consequences of the Nagorno-Karabakh War on 13 November 2020 (picture courtesy of kremlin.ru)

 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?
Trending

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

19 October 2026
Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Dennis Sammut
Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security
Trending

Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

13 November 2026
Ukraine and Russia could see European countries join the next round of peace negotiations, following talks between US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Thursday (November 12). However, conflicting positions over European military involvement, Ukraine’s territorial future and the continent’s security arrangements highlight the difficulties facing the diplomatic process. Speaking after the meeting, Witkoff said European participation would be an important development, describing the countries concerned as key partners. Kushner also indicated that Washington had noticed a shift in European attitudes and believed their involvement would not obstruct progress. In a statement published on X, he said the expanded discussions would address broader European security arrangements alongside territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine. The US envoys subsequently travelled to Dublin, where they met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a European summit. Zelenskyy welcomed the possibility of European participation and expressed hope that the negotiations would include measures to reduce tensions and establish ceasefires. He also reiterated the importance of European representation in decisions concerning the continent’s security. Moscow, however, has offered a more cautious interpretation of the proposed expansion. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, suggested that European countries should first reconsider their military assistance to Kyiv, arguing that their current actions demonstrated an unwillingness to pursue peace. Putin similarly called on Washington to work with its European allies to establish whether they genuinely wanted peace or continued confrontation with Russia. The Russian president also rejected the prospect of European peacekeeping troops being deployed to Ukraine following a potential agreement, describing such a presence as a continuation of the war. His position reflects wider disagreements over the future European security architecture, with Moscow seeking discussions on the continent's broader security arrangements, while European leaders insist that such negotiations cannot replace a settlement of the war. Simultaneously, Zelenskyy raised concerns about disruptions to Starshield, the US-made satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces. He described Washington’s discussions with Moscow about Europe's future security as unusual and warned against decisions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the diplomatic activity, fighting continued. Russian drone attacks killed two people in Ukraine's Sumy region and injured five in Rivne, while a separate attack in Russia's Belgorod region killed one person and injured four. Ukrainian agricultural company Kernel Holding also suspended operations at all its oilseed extraction facilities following repeated Russian attacks.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest
Trending

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

7 September 2026
Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Dennis Sammut
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”
Trending

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

21 September 2026
There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)
Dennis Sammut