Putin chairs meeting of Security Council ahead of Karabakh talks

Russian president Vladimir Putin on Sunday (10 January) held a meeting in virtual mode of Russia's National Security Council to discuss the Karabakh issue, ahead of a meeting tomorrow with the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan.

According to a statement on the Kremlin's website, the meeting was attended by the Secretary of the Security Council Nikolai Patrushev, Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergei Lavrov, Minister of Defense Sergei Shoigu, Director of the Federal Security Service Alexander Bortnikov, and the Director of the Foreign Intelligence Service Sergei Naryshkin.

Putin on Monday is expected to host Armenian prime minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani president Ilham Aliyev to discuss the implementation of the 10 November agreement which brought an end to the Karabakh War. A number of issues resulting from that agreement remain very contentious, and are seen as creating difficulties for the sustainment of the agreement.

In a message on her facebook page, Mane Gevorgyan, spokesperson for the Armenian prime minister clarified the issues planned to be discussed in the Monday meeting. 

"I would like to note that, according to the preliminary planned agenda, the trilateral meeting is of an economic nature, which refers to the opening of regional communications, the implementation of international transport, including from Armenia to Russia, Iran, as well as from the central parts of Armenia along the Nakhchivan railway to the Syunik province," she added.

"The Azerbaijani side and some Armenian circles are constantly circulating the topic of the so-called "Meghri Corridor", but as it has been mentioned many times, the trilateral statement of November 9 does not contain any provision on creating a corridor through Meghri or Armenia.

For the Armenian side, however, the issue of the return of the captives, the search and rescue operations of our soldiers left behind, the search for the bodies of the victims, and the fate of the missing are crucial. Without resolving these issues or making significant progress, it will be extremely difficult to effectively discuss the economic agenda, and the Armenian side considers the discussion of this issue one of the key topics of the Moscow meeting.

I would also like to emphasize that in Moscow  it is not planned to sign any document on the settlement of the Karabakh issue or any territorial issue. "If it is possible to reach an agreement on the issues on the agenda, i.e.economic issues, the exchange of prisoners, the issue of missing persons, it is possible to sign a joint statement on the results of the meeting"

source: commonspace.eu with kremlin.ru and agencies
photo: Russian president Vladimir Putin chaired a meeting of the National Security Council on 10 January to discuss the Karabakh issue (picture courtesy of the press service of the president of Russia.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular