Provocative news item denied by both Armenia and Azerbaijan.

The Ministries of Defence of Armenia and Azerbaijan are often known for issuing diametrically contradictory statements on events that happen on the line of contact separating their two forces in the Karabakh conflict zone. Over the last two days however both sides moved swiftly to deny reports that had been disseminated by some media sources in Azerbaijan that there had been an Armenian attack on Nakhcivan. The reports suggested that the Armenian Air Force was involved, and even suggested that one village, Leketagh had been evacuated after Armenian forces had occupied the heights around the village.

Information from Nakhcivan, which is an autonomous republic of Azerbaijan but which is separated from the rest of the Azerbaijani territory by Armenia, is difficult to get under normal circumstances. The rumours could therefore not be immediately verified by the mainstream media, or other independent sources, and as a result they spread over the last days. There had been incidents involving Armenian and Azerbaijani forces for some days, and both sides suffered casualties. But the advent of a deep incursion with air support, if it had really happened, would have constituted a grave escalation of the current low intensity conflict and cease fire violations.

Both the Ministry of Defence of Armenia, as well as of Azerbaijan, have now denied that any serious incident has taken place, and descibe the original reports as provocation. Mainstream Azerbaijani media have published pictures of a peaceful village of Leketagh and say that residents have denied that they had been under attack at all. The Azerbaijani news agency APA reports that a journalist from a local Nakhcvan newspaper, Elnur Kalbizadeh visited the region and found it to be peaceful. It also published pictures of the village.

Commonspace.eu political editor commented on developments:

"This incident was either a very bad piece of journalism or an outright provocation aimed at instigating more serious consequences. In both cases it raises the danger of the current volatile situation on the line of contact separating Armenian and Azerbaijani forces. The daily violations of the cease fire are a source of concern to the international community that has been calling on both sides to accept a more rigorous supervision of the cease fire and to adopt confidence building measures that can reduce and if possible eliminate the daily incidents and regular loss of life on the front line. There has been an ambivalent response to these calls. The danger of small incidents escalating, either through misperception, or even because they  are on purpose distoprted by either of the sides, or even a third party, constitutes the most likely risk that can re-ignite the Karabakh conflict into an outright war. The rumours of the last days are a good example of how rumour or false stories can spread like wild-fire. On this occasion at least it was heartening to see that the Ministries of Defence of both countries moved swiftly to deny the rumours."

source: commonspace.eu

photo: The village of Leketagh on 11 June 2014 (picture taken by Elnur Kalbizadeh reporduced by APA)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan, met at the Kremlin in Moscow, on Wednesday 1, April, with Russian president Vladimir Putin. The current state and prospects of Russian-Armenian strategic partnership and alliance, integration cooperation in the Eurasian region, and current issues on the regional agenda, in particular the development of economic and transport-logistics ties in the South Caucasus, were discussed, according to the Kremlin website. In his remarks before the meeting, Prime Minister Pashinyan said our relations with the Russian Federation are very deep, they are very important to us, and, in my opinion, they are developing dynamically in the context of the new realities in our region, when peace has finally been established between Armenia and Azerbaijan. And I think this has a positive impact on our relations with the Russian Federation, because for the first time since our independence, we have a railway connection with the Russian Federation. We import goods from Russia via Azerbaijan by rail. I hope we will also export in the near future. This, of course, strengthens our traditional economic ties, and it strengthens our ties within the Eurasian Economic Union. Regarding the European Union, of course, we know that, in principle, membership in the two associations is incompatible. But what we're doing and the agenda we have, at least for now, are compatible. That's a fact. And as long as there's an opportunity to combine these agendas, we will. And when processes develop to the point where a decision must be made, I'm confident that we, the citizens of the Republic of Armenia, will make that decision. Of course, in this context, our relations with the Russian Federation have never been and never will be in question, because, as I have already said, these ties and relations are very deep and not subject to discussion. (read the report in full by clicking the image at the top).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)