President Xi warns against 'new Cold War' amid China's fears world democracies are ganging up against it

Speaking yesterday (25 January) at the virtual World Economic Forum, Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke out in favour of multilateralism whilst warning against meddling in countries' internal affairs.

The Chinese leader forewarned against the formation of “small cliques” in the international order, which he argued will only lead to a dead end. In his first public statement since the inauguration of US President Joe Biden, President Xi called for international cooperation, the removal of the “outdated” zero-sum mentality of the Cold War, and the adherence “to mutual respect and accommodation”. 

In four points, the Chinese leader laid out how he believes the world can move away from the current problems that it is facing, exacerbated by the coronavirus pandemic:

  1. Firstly, he advocated for “openness and inclusiveness instead of closedness and exclusion”. He spoke out in favour multilateralism and the “common values of humanity, namely peace, development, equity, justice, democracy, and freedom”.
  2. Secondly, he called for support for international law and the bolstering of multilateralist institutions, which he stated, “provide the platform for putting multilateralism into action, and which are the basic architecture underpinning multilateralism”.
  3. Thirdly, he suggested that countries should not meddle in each other’s “internal affairs”, and that they should respect and accommodate differences. He warned against “antagonism and confrontation”, which “eventually hurt all countries’ interests and undermine everyone’s well-being”.
  4. Finally, he called for a willingness to accept that the world is changing, calling again for support for multilateral institutions, namely, the World Health Organization (WHO) and World Trade Organization (WTO). He also underlined the importance of delivering on the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and the promotion of green development.

Xi’s statement comes just a month after an agreement in principle on the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment, which aims to increase bilateral investment – giving European companies access and legal safeguards for investments in the Chinese market. Individuals within President Biden’s new administration have made it clear that they do not support the deal, which is being seen by some as an attempt by the EU to depart from its reliance on its transatlantic partner. The agreement has also been heavily criticised in Europe and the West for its lack of provisions regarding human rights and labour reforms, and is thought to be unlikely to pass EU parliamentary scrutiny as it stands.

The Chinese leader’s comments appear to have a least two motives: as a response to President Biden’s assertion that an alliance of democracies needs to work together to combat China’s rise; and as a thinly veiled defence of China’s heavily criticised human rights abuses –  which Xi characterises as “internal affairs” – and sanctions being considered in the West in response to them.

A 14-country survey published by the Pew Research Center in October last year, showed that unfavourable opinions of China are at an all-time high in many Western countries, with a median of 76% of European respondents reporting that they have no trust in President Xi to ‘do the right thing regarding world affairs’.

Source: commonspace.eu with agencies
Photo: A screen grab from President Xi's virtual address

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.