Polisario Front demands UN keeps its promises, as European Court starts addressing a case challenging an EU-Morocco trade agreement

On Saturday, the Polisario Front celebrated the 45th anniversary of creating the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic during which its leaders called on the United Nations to "fulfil its promises to rid Western Sahara from colonialism in accordance with its charter and decisions." The Polisario also accused the UN of siding with Morocco in the dispute over the territory and blamed it for the current political impasse.

The front's leader, Brahim Ghali, and the leader of its national council, Khatri Addouh, made speeches over the weekend in refugee camps that house the Sahrawi population as part of celebrations marking the establishment of the Sahrawi republic.

Western Sahara spans 266 thousand square kilometres just north of Mauritania, and it is considered to be the last territory of the African continent whose status has not been settled in the post-colonial era. Morocco controls more than 80 percent of its area while the Polisario Front controls less than 20 percent. Since spring 2019, quadripartite peace negotiations (Morocco, the Polisario, Algeria and Mauritania) that were sponsored by the United Nations have been suspended.

Rabat proposes an autonomy plan under its sovereignty while the Polisario is calling for a referendum on self-determination. Tensions returned to this region in November 2020, after Morocco deployed its forces in the Guerguerat region after reports that a major road between Morocco and Mauritania was blocked.

Meanwhile, the European Court of Justice will be addressing the Western Sahara file as the Polisario Front is challenging fishery and agriculture agreements between the European Union and Morocco that allow Rabat to export agricultural products and fish from the disputed territory. 

Hearings are scheduled today and tomorrow before the ninth Chamber of the European Court of Justice. A decision, however, might take months. Rabat said that it looks forward to defending the "legitimacy of its commercial partnership" with the European Union.

The front is regularly engaging in diplomacy battles through a number of legal procedures. Lawyer Gilles Devers says that facilitating access to the EU market contributes to maintaining colonialism. The front seeks to push European companies established in Western Sahara to leave.

The Polisario already achieved a victory in 2016 when the European Court ruled that the free trade agreement between Morocco and its main trading partner, the European Union, could not be applied in Western Sahara. However, Duffer believes that the European Parliament circumvented the court’s conclusion by adopting a document in 2019 that extended the preferential customs fees granted under an agreement signed in 2013 between the European Union and Morocco.

The EU Commission said in a 2020 study that this customs agreement is a “key factor in maintaining or even increasing the employment rate” in Western Sahara, and thus it constitutes a “strong asset to reduce immigration pressure, especially in times of crisis.” The study added that this "pragmatic approach" also contributed to establishing a "positive dialogue" with Rabat on the human rights file, where "a certain number of challenges" remain.

In the last days of the former US administration, the Americans announced the recognition of the sovereignty of Morocco over the Sahara. The recognition was believed to be an exchange for Moroccan normalisation with Israel. However, the Chargé d'Affairs of the United States Embassy in Spain, Conrad Tribble, revealed that Washington is reviewing the former administration's recognition of the Moroccan Sahara. Tribble announced that the US has not taken any action pending the reevaluation of the issue. There are various opinion in Washington on this matter with some calling for reversing the recognition citing legal concerns, and other suggesting to keep the recognition as it would open a chance to end the conflict.  

The UN Security Council will likely discuss the issue in April and it is believed that the US would also form its policy by then. 

Source: commonspace.eu with various agencies. 
Picture: EU Court of Justice session to review the Polisario's challenges. (Twitter: @RoubiouAli). 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.