NGO findings in line with official election results

In the wake of yesterday's parliamentary elections, Georgia's largest election monitoring NGO, the International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy (ISFED), issued its own parallel vote tabulation (PVT), a count of the proportion, list vote performed in tandem with the official count by ISFED staff.

In Georgia's young democracy, where exit polls can be wildly inaccurate, and results, as happened last night, contested by the various parties, PVT is means by which ISFED, a well respected body locally, might bolster public trust in the electoral process. After a campaign that occasionally strayed into political violence, and an election-night fraught with allegations from opposition parties of vote-rigging, ISFED's work is very obviously important.

With the PVT results released, its findings very closely correlate to the official vote tally. Both have Georgian Dream in first place, with 49.1 and 49.75% respectively. Both then place the UNM in second, with 26.8 and 26.72%. The PVT likewise accords with official results which, with 66% of precincts reporting, place the Alliance of Patriots as falling just short of the threshold for proportional parliamentary representation, at 4.9%.

Though corroboration of the official results as listed by the Central Elections Commission is welcome, ISFED acknowledged that this election day had been an acrimonious one, with 'significant violations, including violent ones, at several polling stations'. Nevertheless, the incidents, which included outbreaks of violence at polling stations in Zugdidi and Khakheti, were, said ISFED, 'isolated', which no impact on the broader election results.

source: commonspace.eu

 

 

Related articles

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)