Military in Burkina Faso plan a three year transition to civilian rule

A national conference in Burkina Faso has authorised the ruling military junta to organise the transition period leading to a return to constitutional order and civilian rule within three years.

Thus, Lieutenant-Colonel Paul-Henri Damiba, who ousted the elected president Roch Marc Kabore on the 24 January coup d’état, is expected to rule the country for the next three years until elections are held.

Lieutenant-Colonel Damiba will finally be sworn in as Head of State tomorrow (2 March) by an assembly gathering the junta, different opposition parties and trade unions, some civil society organisations as well as people displaced by the jihadist attacks that have hit Burkina Faso since 2015.

However, the charter approved on Tuesday  (1 March) states that the new interim president or his government members will not be eligible to run for the next presidential, legislative and municipal elections that will be organised at the end of the transition period. The transitional government will consist of 25 ministers and a 71-member parliament.

The decision could put the West African country on a collision course with international partners who had called for a swift return to constitutional order following a coup that was widely supported by the population as the former president was considered incapable of containing the growing violence of Islamist militants in the country.

Indeed, Burkina Faso was suspended by the 15-member Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the African Union following the coup. ECOWAS subsequently asked the new military junta to present a "reasonable timetable for the restoration of constitutional order". Discussions should therefore be initiated quickly between these regionall organisations and Burkina Faso to determine whether a three-year transition period is acceptable.

Although ECOWAS has not yet imposed financial sanctions against Burkina Faso whilst the latter's neighbour Mali is subject to economic sanctions that have forced Bamako to pay more than $100 million in interest and capital payments on its debt.

In a region that has experienced more than four coups in 18 months - with two successive ones in Mali, one in Guinea, and recently one in Burkina Faso - the length of transitions is at the heart of negotiations between the countries affected by the coups and ECOWAS. Deemed "unacceptable" by ECOWAS for being too lengthy, the five-year transition proposed by Mali was not accepted by the institution.

Once a region that had a reputation as the continent's "coup belt”, West Africa has been weakened by the numerous attacks perpetrated by armed militants linked to Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State who have killed more than 2,000 people and caused the displacement of more than 1.5 million citizens.

By appropriating swathes of territory, the terrorists have succeeded in instilling fear in the West African populations, who are now demanding and supporting political change that is militarily capable of pushing Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State from their territory.

The new interim President Damiba stated that his main transitional tasks were the “fight against terrorism and the restoration of the national territory” as well as the strengthening of governance through the “fight against corruption”.

The government is therefore expected to satisfy the security needs of his frightened population while respecting the transitional deadlines demanded by Burkina Faso's international partners.

 

Sources: Commonspace.eu with Reuters (London), Le Monde (Paris) and Al Jazeera (Doha)
Picture : Burkina Faso's new interim President Paul-Henri Damiba signs a charter requiring him to organise elections within three years ; Twitter: @actu_salade

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.