Libyan political process in jeopardy

The political process in Libya risks being thrown into turmoil amid reports of bribery during the selection of an interim prime minister in a UN-sponsored process.

The UK's Guardian newspaper and various news agencies have published leaks from a confidential UN report that suggests that interim prime minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibah gained his seat after at least three delegations were bribed to attract votes during a UN-sponsored dialogue forum. The amount of the bribe is estimated at $200,000 according to the leaked information. 

The inquiry reports that a row broke out in the lobby of the hotel in Tunis were the meeting was being held after delegates discovered that the bribe for their vote was lower than the $500,000 that was reportedly offered in secret to others. 

The rumours of bribery have been known in Libya since Dbeibah was elected. The 75 members of the Libyan Political Dialogue Forum (LPDF), who were in charge of selecting the new authority, are likely to have rejected the prospects of Fathi Bashagha of the GNA and Ageela Saleh of the House of Representatives being included in the list. 

The interim prime minister’s office has described the claims as fake news designed to disrupt the political process. The new Libyan executive asked a committee of experts from the United Nations to quickly disclose the results of its investigation. 

"We call on the United Nations Committee of Experts to expedite the disclosure of the results of the investigations and the momentary investigation that it conducted into the allegations of bribery during the Libyan Political Dialogue Forum."

The executive authority also said that everyone who has been proven to be involved in corruption will not be allowed to assume any responsibility as the country intends to march towards the unification of institutions and achieve reconciliation.

Other participants from the LPDF also rejected the allegation via statements on social media. 

The UN report will be published on 15 March after finishing the investigations.  

Elham Saudi, the director of Lawyers for Justice in Libya and a member of the LPDF, abstained from voting due to concerns about the process. 

“The root cause of this is there was a rejection of any meaningful criteria to those standing concerning their record – and the allegations against them – concerning human rights and corruption. That approach is now risking undermining the credibility of the whole process.” 

On the other hand, the House of Representatives is supposed to give a vote of confidence in the new authority but it is likely the vote will be delayed until the UN report is published. 

Dbeibah has only submitted a proposal containing his vision for a unity government but no names yet to the parliament. Dbeibah said that he had full confidence and hope that the parliament would agree to the government.

Source: commonspace.eu with The Guardian (London), AFP (Paris), Al Jazeera (Doha) and agencies
Picture: Voting day during the LPDF (Twitter: @UNSMILibya). 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.