From the Kremlin to Rustavi 2, hysterical reactions pose a threat to Georgia

An already tense situation in Georgia got worse on Sunday evening when the main opposition television station, Rustavi 2, broadcast a program in which one of its more famous journalists, Giorgi Gabunia, used one of its prime time TV shows, "Postscriptum" to unleash an attack against Russia and its president Vladimir Putin, using foul language and swear words. The words, which are too vile to be reprinted here, shocked an already traumatised nation, and threathened to further escalate tensions between Russia and Georgia.

This was the latest in a series of events that followed from an incident in the Georgian parliament on 20 June involving a Russian member of parliament, which quickly escalated into a riot outside parliament, and a a diplomatic incident between Russia and Georgia.

related content: Commentary: A sad day in Georgian politics

Following the outbursts on Rustavi 2 on Sunday evening Georgian government officials condemned the incident in strong words, and even opposition personalities tried to distance themselves from the words of the journalist. But Rustavi 2 is a tightly run operation, and it is difficult to believe that the journalist acted at his own behest on such a sensitive subject at such a sensitive time. Some protestors gathered in front of Rustavi 2 during the night, and the station went off the air for two hours, but resumed broadcasts later saying it had gone of the air to protect its staff.

This is the latest act of political hysteria in a shameful episode. It follows a decision of the Russian government to cut air links to Georgia and advise its citizens not to visit the country, taken by president Putin and his National Security Council hours after the 20 June incident. The Russian government decision has been condemned as being completely out of proportion, and yet another attempt of Russia to exert pressure on its smaller neighbour, which over the last thirty years has experienced unprecedented levels of Russian interference and aggression.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that ''the hysterical outbursts of the last three weeks - from the Kremlin's sanctions  to Rustavi 2's rants - create a serious situation which needs to de-escalate as soon as possible, because immense harm is being done to Georgia, and regional peace is now threatened.

Georgian politicians of all persuasions, who constantly wrap themselves up in EU and NATO flags, have been acting in a way which makes Georgia look like an unstable banana republic not an aspirant for EU or NATO membership.  There has been very little reaction from the international community in the last days, at least in public. Correctly so perhaps because this is a domestic issue. But in Georgia there is a very fine line between the domestic and the international, and a response is now necessary to avoid further damage.  There seems to be no one in Georgia who is able to exercise restraint on a political class that has got used to shooting from the hip, creating a highly polorised, divided and disillusioned society. The international community, and particularly Georgia's friends in the west - the European Union, NATO, the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and others, need now to step in and step up. 

The international friends of Georgia need to speak to Georgian politicians, government as well as opposition, bluntly and firmly. The message needs to be clear: Stop now and get back to proper discussions on Georgia's political future, otherwise the goodwill that Georgia has built up with western institutions thanks to successive governments is going to burn out very quickly!"

source: commonspace.eu

photo: The Georgian parliament building in Tbilisi (archive picture).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.