Jailed journalists from Georgia and Belarus win the Sakharov human rights prize

The European Parliament has awarded the Sakharov human rights prize to jailed Georgian journalist and editor Mzia Amaghlobeli and Polish-Belarusian journalist Andrzej Poczobut, calling them symbols of the "struggle for freedom". Amaghlobeli, 50, has emerged as a symbol of journalistic defiance to what the European Union says is a slide toward authoritarianism in her country.

Poczobut, 52, was jailed over his critical reporting, having refused to leave Belarus after its authoritarian government unleashed a crackdown on dissent, jailing hundreds and forcing most critics into exile. "Both are journalists currently in prison on trumped-up charges simply for doing their work and for speaking out against injustice," European Parliament chief Roberta Metsola said in announcing the laureates in Strasbourg.  "Their courage has made them symbols of the struggle for freedom and democracy. This House stands with them and with all those who continue to demand freedom." 

The Sakharov Prize, set up in 1988 and named after Soviet dissident Andrei Sakharov, is bestowed annually on individuals or organisations to recognise their fight for human rights or democracy. Contenders are nominated by parliament's political groups as well as individual lawmakers.

The choice of this year's winners "sends a strong message to all political prisoners that you are not alone, and journalism is not a crime," exiled Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tikhanovskaya told lawmakers. She was in Strasbourg with her recently released husband.

The candidacy of Poczobut and Amaghlobeli was backed by parliament's biggest group, the conservative EPP, and the hard-right ECR.

Amaghlobeli has championed investigations into public spending and abuse of office through her independent newsrooms Batumelebi and Netgazeti.

The recognition of her "sacrifice and courage celebrates the fight for democracy of the entire Georgian people," the outlets said in a statement to AFP, calling the award "historic".

Amaghlobeli was arrested in January after TV footage showed her grabbing a police officer and slapping him amid a heated exchange during a protest in the Black Sea city of Batumi. Despite appeals from Georgian and international rights groups to release her, a court in August sentenced her to two years in prison on charges of using "resistance, threat or violence" against an official.  "Whatever decision you make, I want you to know that I consider myself victorious," she told the court ahead of the verdict. "What happened was not an attack," she said, calling it a "symbolic slap."

Georgian authorities, which critics accuse of moving the ex-Soviet state back towards Russia, have launched a targeted crackdown on opposition leaders and dozens of anti-government protesters amid a year-long political stand-off. 

Detained since 2021, Poczobut, a correspondent for Polish newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza, was sentenced to eight years in jail in February 2023, in a verdict Poland slammed as "unfair". He had covered mass protests against Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko in 2020. 

His jailing came at a time of heightened tensions with Poland, which has become a hub for thousands of Belarusians fleeing their homeland, ruled by Lukashenko since 1994. "He's on my mind every day," Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski said last year after Warsaw failed to secure the release of Poczobut in a major swap deal between Belarus's main ally, Russia, and the West.

Gazeta Wyborcza's deputy editor-in-chief Roman Imielski said he hoped the award would "mark a new opening" for Poczobut to regain his freedom. Concerns have been raised for his health in the country's notoriously secretive prison system, where inmates are regularly held incommunicado for months.

The prize comes with a 50,000-euro ($58,000) endowment and will be handed out in a ceremony on December 16.

Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado and her ally, former presidential candidate Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia, were last year's winners. Machado went on to win this year's Nobel Peace Prize.

Source: commonspace.eu with the EP information Service and agencies. Photo: Journalists Mzia Amaghlobeli and Andrzej Poczobut won the EU's top human rights award  © FREDERICK FLORIN / AFP

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)