Great power interest in Central Asia putting Uzbekistan in the spotlight

In recent times, Central Asia’s most populous nation has become the centre of attention for great powers, underscored by high level diplomatic contacts with the United States, the hosting of a regional summit with the leadership of the European Union and a high profile visit by hundreds of Russian officials and executives who participated in a trade fair in Tashkent. Western interest centres on Uzbekistan’s abundant reserves of critical minerals and a desire to develop clean energy  sources, including nuclear power. Russia, along with China, has broader trade interests, including developing manufacturing capacity.

So far, all the discussions have generated lots of optimistic jargon about the future potential of expanding trade, but few tangible results. EU officials announced a 12 billion euro investment package, but it was short on details. The Russian delegation visit, meanwhile, yielded no substantive announcements.

“The importance of enhancing trade and economic cooperation, promoting cooperation projects and programs, including through the development of coordinated solutions on the platform of the ‘Innoprom’ trade fair has been noted,” read a statement issued by Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev’s office in late April following talks with Kremlin representatives.

Deals or no deals, the maneuvering shows no signs of letting up. According to Uzbek media reports, Uzbek Foreign Minister Bakhtiyor Saidov during an early April trip  to Washington extended an official invitation for President Trump to visit Uzbekistan. Speaking to journalists in Tashkent, US envoy to Tashkent, Jonathan Henick, indicated that the invitation is under serious consideration by the White House.

“Taking into account that more than 30 years have passed since independence, I believe that now is the right time for a visit by a US president to the region,” the Kun.uz news outlet quoted Henick as saying. The US ambassador suggested that any Trump trip would occur within the C5+1 format, a US initiative to strengthen ties with all five Central Asian states.

Henick praised Uzbekistan’s cooperation with the Trump administration on the issue of illegal migration, while framing the president’s “American First” outlook as a win-win approach for bilateral trade relations. “Our work in Uzbekistan is not a relationship based on charity or humanitarian aid. This is a relationship based on partnership and mutual benefit,” the Gazeta.uz outlet quoted Henick as saying.

Perhaps the most spirited great-power jockeying at present centers on nuclear power. Rosatom, Russia’s nuclear energy agency, has an agreement in place to build a reactor, but Uzbek officials have expressed a desire to diversify the operation of a nuclear plant to prevent any single outside power from having a controlling interest, and, therefore, possessing the ability to apply political pressure on Tashkent.

Judging by Mirziyoyev’s statement, there was no change in the Uzbek position arising out of his late April meeting with Rosatom’s chief, Alexey Likhachev. 

Financing remains a major issue for the construction of a nuclear power plant, and it is evident Tashkent does not hold all the cards in trying to strike the best deal. On April 25, top officials from Uzbekistan’s nuclear energy agency, Uzatom, sought funding from China’s Eximbank, apparently only to be told by bank representatives that financing would be contingent on the participation of Chinese companies in the implementation of nuclear projects in Uzbekistan.

Source: commonspace.eu with agencies and Eurasia.net. Photo: Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev speaks with the top officials of a visiting Russian delegation at the Innoprom trade fair in Tashkent on April 28. Source: president.uz

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

Russia could attack a NATO country within the next five years, the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, said in a stark new warning. "NATO's own defences can hold for now," Rutte warned in Berlin, but conflict was "next door" to Europe, and he feared "too many are quietly complacent, and too many don't feel the urgency, too many believe that time is on our side. "Russia is already escalating its covert campaign against our societies," Rutte said in a speech in Germany. "We must be prepared for the scale of war our grandparents or great-grandparents endured." Earlier this month, Russia's President Vladimir Putin said his country was not planning to go to war with Europe, but it was ready "right now" if Europe wanted to - or started a war. But similar reassurances were given by Moscow in 2022, just before 200,000 Russian troops crossed the border and invaded Ukraine. Putin has accused European countries of hindering US efforts to bring peace in Ukraine - a reference to the role Ukraine's European allies have recently played in trying to change a US peace plan to end the war, whose initial draft was seen as favouring Russia. But Putin was not sincere, Nato's secretary-general said in the German capital, Berlin. Supporting Ukraine, he added, was a guarantee for European security. "Just imagine if Putin got his way; Ukraine under the boot of Russian occupation, his forces pressing against a longer border with Nato, and the significantly increased risk of an armed attack against us." Russia's economy has been on a war footing for more than three years now - its factories churn out ever more supplies of drones, missiles and artillery shells. According to a recent report by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Russia has been producing each month around 150 tanks, 550 infantry fighting vehicles, 120 Lancet drones and more than 50 artillery pieces. The UK, and most of its Western allies, are simply not anywhere near this point. Analysts say it would take years for Western Europe's factories to come close to matching Russia's mass-production of weapons. "Allied defence spending and production must rise rapidly, our armed forces must have what they need to keep us safe," the Nato chief said.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

Russia could attack a NATO country within the next five years, the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, said in a stark new warning. "NATO's own defences can hold for now," Rutte warned in Berlin, but conflict was "next door" to Europe, and he feared "too many are quietly complacent, and too many don't feel the urgency, too many believe that time is on our side. "Russia is already escalating its covert campaign against our societies," Rutte said in a speech in Germany. "We must be prepared for the scale of war our grandparents or great-grandparents endured." Earlier this month, Russia's President Vladimir Putin said his country was not planning to go to war with Europe, but it was ready "right now" if Europe wanted to - or started a war. But similar reassurances were given by Moscow in 2022, just before 200,000 Russian troops crossed the border and invaded Ukraine. Putin has accused European countries of hindering US efforts to bring peace in Ukraine - a reference to the role Ukraine's European allies have recently played in trying to change a US peace plan to end the war, whose initial draft was seen as favouring Russia. But Putin was not sincere, Nato's secretary-general said in the German capital, Berlin. Supporting Ukraine, he added, was a guarantee for European security. "Just imagine if Putin got his way; Ukraine under the boot of Russian occupation, his forces pressing against a longer border with Nato, and the significantly increased risk of an armed attack against us." Russia's economy has been on a war footing for more than three years now - its factories churn out ever more supplies of drones, missiles and artillery shells. According to a recent report by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Russia has been producing each month around 150 tanks, 550 infantry fighting vehicles, 120 Lancet drones and more than 50 artillery pieces. The UK, and most of its Western allies, are simply not anywhere near this point. Analysts say it would take years for Western Europe's factories to come close to matching Russia's mass-production of weapons. "Allied defence spending and production must rise rapidly, our armed forces must have what they need to keep us safe," the Nato chief said.