French army chief denounces UN report against French troops in Mali

On 22 May, the Chief of Staff of the French Armed Forces, General François Lecointre, accused the UN of “bias” and “manipulation” in its investigation into French soldiers accused of killing 19 civilians at a marriage ceremony in Mali on 3 January 2021.

"Very clearly, this was an attack against the French army, against Operation Barkhane [the French anti-insurgency operation in the Sahel], against the legitimacy of our commitments," he said in an interview with the French daily newspaper, Le Figaro. The "errors" and "biases" of the report by the Human Rights Directorate of MINUSMA, the UN Mission in Mali, "stem in part from manipulation," General Lecointre said.

Whilst on 7 January, France reported killing some 30 militants in an airstrike on 3 January, the UN report claims that the attack was on a wedding ceremony attended by some hundred civilians, as well as five armed insurgents, presumed to be members of the Katiba Serma militant group. The report found that the strike had killed 22 people – 19 civilians and three of those thought to be Katiba Serma militants.

The French authorities have always maintained that there was no marriage, that intelligence had "formally" established that it was a gathering of jihadists and that the intervention of a patrol of French planes dropping three bombs had "neutralized" about thirty jihadists. "I think that we will now be systematically confronted with this type of attempt to seek to hinder us, to discredit us, to delegitimise our action, to mount populations against our action," added the army Chief of Staff.

French Minister of the Armed Forces, Florence Parly, spoke of an “information war” waged by the jihadist groups. The Malian authorities have provided a version of events consistent with that of France.

Since the pro-independence and then jihadist rebellions in 2012 in the north, Mali has been plagued by a multifaceted turmoil that has left thousands dead, civilians and combatants, and hundreds of thousands displaced, despite the intervention of the UN, and African and French forces. France, which engages around 5,100 men in Operation Barkhane, has already been the subject to the suspicion of blunder, but never in such a detailed report by the UN.

Despite MINUSMA’s accusations, the head of United Nations peace operations, Jean-Pierre Lacroix, expressed his support for the French troops in Mali last week (18 May) before the UN Security Council. He stressed that since the Pau Summit in January 2020, the strengthening of national armies; the temporary deployment of 600 additional French soldiers within Operation Barkhane; the strengthening of co-ordination between the national armies, Barkhane, the G5 Sahel Joint Force and MINUSMA; and the deployment of Task Force Takuba, have made it possible to record results in the fight against terrorism in the region.

 

Source: commonspace.eu with Le Figaro and agencies
Photo: General François Lecointre (archive); Jérémy Barande / Ecole polytechnique Université Paris-Saclay / CC BY-SA 2.0

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan, met at the Kremlin in Moscow, on Wednesday 1, April, with Russian president Vladimir Putin. The current state and prospects of Russian-Armenian strategic partnership and alliance, integration cooperation in the Eurasian region, and current issues on the regional agenda, in particular the development of economic and transport-logistics ties in the South Caucasus, were discussed, according to the Kremlin website. In his remarks before the meeting, Prime Minister Pashinyan said our relations with the Russian Federation are very deep, they are very important to us, and, in my opinion, they are developing dynamically in the context of the new realities in our region, when peace has finally been established between Armenia and Azerbaijan. And I think this has a positive impact on our relations with the Russian Federation, because for the first time since our independence, we have a railway connection with the Russian Federation. We import goods from Russia via Azerbaijan by rail. I hope we will also export in the near future. This, of course, strengthens our traditional economic ties, and it strengthens our ties within the Eurasian Economic Union. Regarding the European Union, of course, we know that, in principle, membership in the two associations is incompatible. But what we're doing and the agenda we have, at least for now, are compatible. That's a fact. And as long as there's an opportunity to combine these agendas, we will. And when processes develop to the point where a decision must be made, I'm confident that we, the citizens of the Republic of Armenia, will make that decision. Of course, in this context, our relations with the Russian Federation have never been and never will be in question, because, as I have already said, these ties and relations are very deep and not subject to discussion. (read the report in full by clicking the image at the top).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)