A fragile peace between national minorities in Georgia is under threat

With fighting between Armenians and Azerbaijanis raging in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone, a relative peace and "business as usual" atmosphere between different national minorities in Georgia is now under serious pressure.

The current crisis is likely to affect the large Armenian and Azerbaijani communities, which have been living until now side by side in relative peace and stability.

Georgia is the most ethnically diverse state in the South Caucasus and Azerbaijanis and Armenians form the largest group of ethnic minorities, together making up more than 500,000 citizens of Georgia. 

The Azerbaijani community numbers 284,761 persons, according to the "National Integration and Tolerance in Georgia Assessment Survey Report 2007-2008". Azerbaijanis are the country's largest ethnic minority group, inhabiting mostly rural areas in Kvemo Kartli, Kakheti, Shida Kartli and Mtskheta-Mtianeti, and they have around 117 Azerbaijani-language schools. 

On the other hand there are nearly 248,929 Armenians in Georgia, again according to the "National Integration and Tolerance in Georgia Assessment Survey Report 2007-2008", living mostly in Samtskhe-Javakheti region and in Tbilisi, with 141 Armenian-language schools.

Both communities play an active role in the Georgian economy. They are mainly engaged through small or a medium-sized businesses, mainly in the services sector, agriculture and trade.

They also traditionally take an active part in the political life of the country, especially during the parliamentary elections, where minorities traditionally vote for the ruling party in Georgia. 

But with the war in Karabakh a relative peace and "business as usual" with these communities could change and this could affect Georgia especially in these challenging moments, with upcoming parliamentary elections, and a spike in the number of covid-19 cases that are now the highest since the outbreak of the pandemic which has also taken a heavy toll on the economy. 

Georgia traditionally has good relations with both Azerbaijan and Armenia, both economically and politically. The life of all three republics has always depended to one degree or another on the stability and well-being of each other and co-existing of this communities in Georgia has always been the proof of the possibility of peace between their home-countries. 

Until now, there have been no major incidents between these communities, and it seems that the Georgian authorities are keen to keep it that way and dealing with the issue with a high degree of sensitivity. 

On Monday, however, we saw the first sign of tension. A small incident developed when humanitarian aid from the Armenian-speaking community of Samtskhe-Javakheti was stopped by Georgian border guards on the Georgia-Armenian border. A group of Georgian-Armenians were also not allowed to cross the border, since they were suspected of going to join the war effort.

The incident appears to have been defused, but it was just a sign of what can happen in the future. The Georgian government appears to be seriously worried about the situation, and has offered to host talks between the Armenian and Azerbaijani governments in Tbilisi. However as long as the fighting continues, the stress on Georgia's delicate inter-ethnic relations will also continued.

related content: Commentary: The high cost in human life of the current fighting in Karabakh

Source: This report was prepared by the Commonspace.eu South Caucasus Bureau in Tbilisi

Photo: A stand-off at the Georgian-Armenian border on 29 September 2020 (picture courtesy of JNews.ge, Tbilisi

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)