EU tariffs on China are not punishment, says German economy minister

Proposed European Union tariffs on Chinese goods are not a "punishment", German Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Action Robert Habeck assured Chinese officials in Beijing on Saturday (22 June). The visit is the first by a senior European official since Brussels proposed significant tariffs on imports of Chinese-made electric vehicles (EVs) in response to what the EU sees as excessive subsidies. Ahead of Habeck's arrival, China warned that rising tensions over EVs could spark a trade war. "It is important to understand that these are not punitive tariffs," Habeck told the opening session of a dialogue on climate and transformation. He stressed that unlike the US, Brazil and Turkey, which have used punitive tariffs, the EU is taking a different approach.

The European Commission spent nine months investigating whether Chinese companies had received unfair subsidies. Habeck explained that any countervailing duties resulting from the EU's review are not punitive but are intended to offset the advantages that Beijing has granted to Chinese companies. "Achieving common, equal standards for market access is essential," he added. During a meeting with Zheng Shanjie, chairman of China's National Development and Reform Commission, Habeck explained that the proposed EU tariffs aimed to create a level playing field. Zheng countered, "We will do everything to protect Chinese companies," arguing that the tariffs would hurt both sides. He urged Germany to take the lead within the EU and "do the right thing". Zheng rejected accusations of unfair subsidies, arguing that the growth of China's new energy industry was due to competitive advantages in technology, market and industry chains. This growth was the result of competition, not subsidies, Zheng said. Following his meeting with Zheng, Habeck spoke with Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, who was due to discuss the tariffs with EU Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis via video conference on Saturday evening.

Although trade tensions were a key issue, the main aim of the meeting was to strengthen cooperation on the green transition between the two industrialised nations. This was the first plenary meeting of the Climate and Transformation Dialogue since Germany and China signed a memorandum of understanding in June last year to cooperate on climate change and the green transition. China will add nearly 350 gigawatts (GW) of new renewable capacity in 2023, more than half the global total. At this rate, China is likely to exceed its 2030 target this year, according to a June report by the International Energy Agency (IEA). While Habeck praised China's expansion of renewable energy, he stressed the importance of looking at overall CO2 emissions. Coal will still account for almost 60% of China's electricity supply 2023. "China has a coal-based energy mix," Zheng acknowledged, with China, India and Indonesia accounting for nearly 75% of global coal consumption, prioritising energy security, availability and cost over carbon emissions. Zheng noted that China is building coal-fired power plants as a security measure. "I still believe that the massive expansion of coal power can be approached differently if you consider the role of renewables in the system," Habeck replied.

Source: commonspace.eu and Reuters with other agencies

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular