EU tariffs on China are not punishment, says German economy minister

Proposed European Union tariffs on Chinese goods are not a "punishment", German Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Action Robert Habeck assured Chinese officials in Beijing on Saturday (22 June). The visit is the first by a senior European official since Brussels proposed significant tariffs on imports of Chinese-made electric vehicles (EVs) in response to what the EU sees as excessive subsidies. Ahead of Habeck's arrival, China warned that rising tensions over EVs could spark a trade war. "It is important to understand that these are not punitive tariffs," Habeck told the opening session of a dialogue on climate and transformation. He stressed that unlike the US, Brazil and Turkey, which have used punitive tariffs, the EU is taking a different approach.

The European Commission spent nine months investigating whether Chinese companies had received unfair subsidies. Habeck explained that any countervailing duties resulting from the EU's review are not punitive but are intended to offset the advantages that Beijing has granted to Chinese companies. "Achieving common, equal standards for market access is essential," he added. During a meeting with Zheng Shanjie, chairman of China's National Development and Reform Commission, Habeck explained that the proposed EU tariffs aimed to create a level playing field. Zheng countered, "We will do everything to protect Chinese companies," arguing that the tariffs would hurt both sides. He urged Germany to take the lead within the EU and "do the right thing". Zheng rejected accusations of unfair subsidies, arguing that the growth of China's new energy industry was due to competitive advantages in technology, market and industry chains. This growth was the result of competition, not subsidies, Zheng said. Following his meeting with Zheng, Habeck spoke with Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, who was due to discuss the tariffs with EU Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis via video conference on Saturday evening.

Although trade tensions were a key issue, the main aim of the meeting was to strengthen cooperation on the green transition between the two industrialised nations. This was the first plenary meeting of the Climate and Transformation Dialogue since Germany and China signed a memorandum of understanding in June last year to cooperate on climate change and the green transition. China will add nearly 350 gigawatts (GW) of new renewable capacity in 2023, more than half the global total. At this rate, China is likely to exceed its 2030 target this year, according to a June report by the International Energy Agency (IEA). While Habeck praised China's expansion of renewable energy, he stressed the importance of looking at overall CO2 emissions. Coal will still account for almost 60% of China's electricity supply 2023. "China has a coal-based energy mix," Zheng acknowledged, with China, India and Indonesia accounting for nearly 75% of global coal consumption, prioritising energy security, availability and cost over carbon emissions. Zheng noted that China is building coal-fired power plants as a security measure. "I still believe that the massive expansion of coal power can be approached differently if you consider the role of renewables in the system," Habeck replied.

Source: commonspace.eu and Reuters with other agencies

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Mark Carney: "The world is in the midst of a rupture, not a transition"

Mark Carney: "The world is in the midst of a rupture, not a transition"

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said the "old order is not coming back" and urged fellow middle powers to come together in a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. "Middle powers must act together because if we're not at the table, we're on the menu," Carney said on Tuesday, adding that he believed powerful nations were using economic coercion to get what they want. He also affirmed Canada's support for Greenland, Denmark and the Nato alliance, drawing applause. "Great powers" are often defined as countries with permanent seats on United Nations Security Council - China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States - which shows their economic and military dominance in the world. Middle powers, such as Canada, Australia, Argentina, South Korea and Brazil, are nations that still exert large influence in global politics, even though their economies are smaller. In his speech, Carney said the world is "in the midst of a rupture, not a transition". "Great powers have begun using economic integration as weapons, tariffs as leverage, financial infrastructure as coercion, supply chains as vulnerabilities to be exploited," he said. He also said "Canada was amongst the first to hear the wake-up call" that geography and historic alliances no longer guaranteed security or prosperity. As a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato), Canada stands firmly with Greenland and Denmark and supports "their unique right to determine Greenland's future", Carney said in his speech. "Our commitment to Article Five is unwavering," the prime minister added, referring to a clause in the Nato agreement that states an attack against one member state is considered an attack on all. (read the full speech of the Canadian prime minister at Davos by clicking the picture).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)