Document: The Mandate of the co-Chairmen of the OSCE Minsk Process

As fighting rages on in the South Caucasus between Armenians and Azerbaijanis, the role of the co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group is often discussed. Who gave this group and the mandate to mediate in the conflict? This was done by the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) in 1995. The mandate was issued by the Chairmanship of the organisation for that year, which was Hungary. Since the original mandate was envisaged that the process will end with a peace conference in Minsk, the group became known as the Minsk Group.

The mandate reads as follows


Mandate
 of the Co-Chairmen of the Conference
on Nagorno Karabakh under the auspices of the OSCE
("Minsk Conference")

The Co-Chairmen are appointed by the Chairman-in-Office;

The Co-Chairmen will be guided in their activities by the principles and norms of the
OSCE, the United Nations Charter, decisions of the OSCE fora, including the decisions by the
Council of Ministers on 24 March 1992 and particularly the Budapest Summit Decision, and as
applicable resolutions of the United Nations Security Council.

The Co-Chairmen will in their work be guided by the objectives of the Minsk Conference,
e. promoting a resolution of the conflict without the use of force and in particular facilitating
negotiations for a peaceful and comprehensive settlement, according to the rules of procedure as
these are stated in the decisions of the 10th meeting of the CSO of the CSCE.
The Co-Chairmen will realize full co-ordination in all mediating and negotiating activities,
harmonizing them into a single coordinated effort within the framework of the OSCE;

The Co-Chairmen will, jointly and in full parity, on the basis of impartiality:

1. make joint efforts in order to strengthen the cease-fire;

2. develop a common basis for negotiations with the parties to the conflict;

3. conduct negotiations with the parties to the conflict for the conclusion of a political
agreement on the cessation of the armed conflict, drawing upon the progress achieved in
previous mediating activities;

4. promote direct contacts, as appropriate, including substantial talks. among the parties to
the conflict;

5. continue working with the parties to the conflict on confidence-building measures,
particularly in the humanitarian field, synchronizing them with the political process;

6. assist the Chairman-in-Office in developing a plan for the establishment, composition and
operation of a multinational OSCE peace-keeping force;

7 forward to the Chairman-in-Office the received approvals and formal requests by the parties
to the conflict concerning the OSCE peace-keeping operation;

8. Report to the Chairman-in-Office on the process of negotiations with the parties to the
conflict on a draft mandate, Memoranda of Understanding and provisions of guaranties for
the safety at all times of personnel involved;
The Co-Chairmen will:

9. jointly chair the regular consultations of the Minsk Group, dispatch jointly to the Minsk
Group members, documents, information and proposals, including proposals on the dates
and venues of the Minsk Group meetings and the set of issues to be discussed;

10. jointly and continuously inform and consult with the OSCE Chairman-in-Office and jointly
inform, on a regular basis, the Permanent Council of the OSCE on the progress of their
work;

11. after consultations with the CiO, jointly inform, the President of the United Nations Security
Council and the United Nations Secretary-General on the progress of the Minsk process
and on all aspects of the situation on the ground, on the implementation of its relevant
resolutions as well as on the present and future co-operation between the OSCE and the
United Nations in this regard; when necessary, and after appropriate consultation with the
CiO, present to the United Nations considerations and proposals concerning new
resolutions that might be adopted by the United Nations Security Council in the interests of
the peaceful settlement of the conflict;

12. visit jointly, or when appropriate separately, on an agreed basis, the region of conflict to
maintain contacts with parties to the conflict concerning the above-mentioned and other
related issues;

13. upon consultation with the CiO, maintain necessary contacts with the !CRC, the UNHCR
and other relevant international and regional organizations and institutions.

14. jointly chair the Minsk Conference and the preparatory meetings leading to it.

15. The Co-Chairmen will co-operate with the Personal Representative of the Chairman-inOffice in accordance with provisions, contained in the Mandate of the Personal
Representative.

You can also read the mandate on the OSCE website here

source: commonspace.eu with osce.org

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Dunya Mijatovic: "Entrenched harmful stereotypes and prejudice against LGBTI people still prevail in segments of Georgian society, including some politicians"

Dunya Mijatovic: "Entrenched harmful stereotypes and prejudice against LGBTI people still prevail in segments of Georgian society, including some politicians"

On March 27, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Dunja Mijatović, issued a statement calling on the Georgian government to “fully respect” its human rights obligations as a Council of Europe member state, “including with regard to the protection of the human rights of LGBTI people,” in response to the ruling party’s initiation of two draft constitutional laws on “family values and the protection of minors.” “I am concerned about the present political discourse in Georgia, as illustrated by the announcement made by the Georgian Dream Party of their initiative to amend the Constitution and to adopt a new constitutional law on ‘Protection of Family Values and Underaged Persons’. It is reflective of entrenched harmful stereotypes and prejudice against LGBTI people which still prevail in segments of Georgian society, including some politicians, and is capable of having a strong, negative impact on the human rights, safety and well-being of LGBTI people and defenders of their rights. It also represents the political manipulation of LGBTI-phobia in the run-up to elections, which I have previously condemned, and which should have no place in a democratic society, based on the rule of law and respect for human rights of everyone.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Dunya Mijatovic: "Entrenched harmful stereotypes and prejudice against LGBTI people still prevail in segments of Georgian society, including some politicians"

Dunya Mijatovic: "Entrenched harmful stereotypes and prejudice against LGBTI people still prevail in segments of Georgian society, including some politicians"

On March 27, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Dunja Mijatović, issued a statement calling on the Georgian government to “fully respect” its human rights obligations as a Council of Europe member state, “including with regard to the protection of the human rights of LGBTI people,” in response to the ruling party’s initiation of two draft constitutional laws on “family values and the protection of minors.” “I am concerned about the present political discourse in Georgia, as illustrated by the announcement made by the Georgian Dream Party of their initiative to amend the Constitution and to adopt a new constitutional law on ‘Protection of Family Values and Underaged Persons’. It is reflective of entrenched harmful stereotypes and prejudice against LGBTI people which still prevail in segments of Georgian society, including some politicians, and is capable of having a strong, negative impact on the human rights, safety and well-being of LGBTI people and defenders of their rights. It also represents the political manipulation of LGBTI-phobia in the run-up to elections, which I have previously condemned, and which should have no place in a democratic society, based on the rule of law and respect for human rights of everyone.