In Chad, Mahamat Deby digs in one year after his father's assassination

A year ago, on 20 April 2021, the Chadian army announced the death of President Idriss Déby Itno, who had been the head of Chad’s authoritarian government for 30 years, died on the front line facing yet another rebellion.

On the same day, his son Mahamat Idriss Déby Itno, a 37-year-old army general, was appointed president of a transitional government and a military junta of 15 generals. This succession was coordinated with Haroun Kabadi, the president of the national assembly and constitutional successor in case of the death of the head of state.

The support of the international community, be it France, the European Union or the African Union for the young leader was immediate. At the time, Mahamat Déby promised to hand over power to civilians and to organise elections within 18 months. His army, one of the few operational ones in the Sahel, is considered indispensable in the war against jihadists in the region.

The early days were difficult. The young head of state dissolved the Chadian parliament, dismissed the government and abrogated the constitution. However, he reassured everyone, promising free and democratic elections after a transition of eighteen months, renewable once. The new strong man of N'Djamena also pledged not to run in a future presidential election.

While the African Union is demanding that the timetable for the presidential election be respected and that no member of the military council run, Déby said in June 2021 that he would not rule out an extension of the transition. According to him, his personal destiny for the presidential election depends on the ability of Chadians to agree and on the will of God.

Mahammat Déby had also promised an "inclusive national dialogue" open to all opposition forces, both political and military. This dialogue is now scheduled for 10 May after having been postponed several times. To prepare all parties involved for future negotiations, a "pre-dialogue" mediation has been organised in Qatar starting 13 March, bringing together the government and more than 250 opponents, mostly from rebel groups.

At present, the dialogue is sterile because the opposition refuses any direct negotiation with the Chadian transitional authorities and exchanges only take place through Qatari intermediaries

Imagining elections in the next six months seems far-fetched, given the accumulated delays.

The opposition accuses Mahamat Déby of sabotaging the talks in order to gain time for the elections, by imposing a large number of interlocutors with different views and objectives, which necessarily complicates the dialogue.

Thus, while Déby allows the political opposition to demonstrate, which is a change from his father's authoritarian policies, no tangible progress has been made in the last year. The maintenance of the national dialogue seems illusory, and the holding of elections on the scheduled date remains a chimera.

The perpetuation of the regime is therefore the most likely hypothesis for the moment. The power of former president Idriss Déby Itno was primarily based on his control over the army and its Zaghawa ethnic group.

As Thierry Vircoulon - associate researcher at the Sub-Saharan Africa Centre - has noted, Mahamat Déby chose continuity, and quickly consolidated his power by surrounding himself with figures from the former regime, with the Zaghawas still in charge.

This transition would represent a guarantee of stability and security in a region that has been plagued by terrorist attacks in recent years, but it would also constitute a democratic failure.

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with France24 (Paris), Le Point (Paris) and other media outlets
Picture: French President Emmanuel Macron, center, in Ndjamena, the capital of Chad, for the funeral in April 2021. Chad’s new leader, the son of the late president, is to the left of him; AFP: Christophe Petit Tesson
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)