Bloodbath in Mali as security forces chase Islamist jihadists

In a statement published on Friday (April 1), the Malian army said that the operation carried between 23 and 31 March around Moura, a village in central Mali, killed 203 combatants, arrested 51 people, and seized large quantities of weapons.

During several days of blockade, the village of Moura was the scene of a campaign of terror worthy of one of the worst killings in recent Malian history. According to testimonies, three helicopters were mobilised on Sunday 27 March and machine-gunned suspected jihadist militants.

The soldiers then proceeded to separate the villagers into three groups: terrorists, suspected terrorists, and suspected collaborators. While the first group is executed on the spot, the others were handcuffed and interrogated.

According to several security sources, the soldiers who acted were white and spoke an unknown language, suggesting a presence of Russian militants belonging to the Kremlin-backed Wagner group, possibly with elements from the North Caucasus.

More than 1,000 soldiers from the Russian paramilitary company Wagner have been deployed in Mali since December 2021.

US State Department spokesman Ned Price said on Sunday, 3 April, that the number of people killed in Moura presented "extremely disturbing" accounts. Ned Price was also sceptical because of the discrepancy in the reports at his disposal. On the one hand, some reports point to the involvement of forces from the Kremlin-backed Wagner Group, while others point to the Malian Armed Forces (FAMA) having targeted elements of known extremist groups. Price therefore called on the Malian transitional authorities to grant “impartial investigators free, unfettered, and safe access to the area where these tragic events unfolded."

Officials at the Russian Embassy in Washington declined to comment immediately on reports of the Wagner Group's involvement.

Reports of dozens of deaths during the attack in Moura flooded social networks last week.

Yet, poor access to Mali’s conflict areas and a relative lack of independent information sources means that it is difficult to verify the army’s claimed death toll or the social media reports.

It is not the first time that Mali’s ill-equipped army is accused of committing abuses during the conflict. UN Secretary-General António Guterres recently warned the Security Council that Mali’s counterterrorism efforts had “disastrous consequences for the civilian population”.

The West African nation of about 21 million people has seen an uptick in violence in recent weeks as European troops scale back their operations.

On 17 February, France and its European partners announced that they would withdraw most of their troops from Mali by this summer. This comes in the wake of the recent political and security deterioration following successive coups in Mali. This withdrawal put an end to the French counter-terrorism mission called Barkhane, which includes Canada, and to the European mission named Takuba, comprising European special forces.

After fighting Islamic insurgents in Mali for almost ten years, France is now turning to another ally, Niger, as a base from where to conduct military operations in this region plagued by al-Qaida and Islamic State (IS) affiliated terrorist groups.

The UN said earlier this month that thousands of people fleeing fighting in Mali have arrived in Niger.

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with DW News (Bonn), Al Jazeera (Doha), Reuters (London), Libération (Île-de-France)
Picture: A malian soldier (FAMA); Twitter: @ASSN_Africa

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations. A terse statement, published on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said, "The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia , S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU." This followed a statement issued the day before, by the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) that challenges the Armenian trajectory towards approximating to the European Union. Vladimir Putin is undertood to have personally pushed the other four EAEU leaders to issue the statement, which said: "Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union."
Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)