Menu

Biggest obstacle to reviving Iran deal still unresolved but talks may resume soon

After the recent impasse over the designation by the United States of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organisation, Iran signalled a willingness the reopen the seven-week stalled negotiations on the nuclear issue in Vienna. It has, however, not dropped its demands for the group it considers to be an integral part of its security structure to be removed from the the US’ Foreign Terrorist Organization list. 

Enrique Mora, the senior EU official coordinating the nuclear talks, was in Tehran last week for discussions with Iranian officials. The European negotiators remain the most optimistic of the prospects of an agreement, and are active in closing the remaining gaps between the US and Iran. 

The EU's foreign policy chief, Josep Borell, said he believed there had been enough progress during consultations between his envoy and Iranian officials in Tehran to relaunch nuclear negotiations after two months of deadlock.

“These things cannot be resolved overnight,” Borrell told reporters at a G7 foreign ministers' meeting in Germany. “Let's say the negotiations were blocked and they have been de-blocked", with the prospect of “reaching a final agreement”.

However, it seems the most challenging obstacle is yet to be overcomed. According to some western sources, the US might be willing to discuss the IRGC but only after a deal is settled. Following the visit of Mora, it is now believed that Iran will be back at the table for other non-IRGC topics. However, it is not clear if Iran will have any further, or alternative, demands. 

Public opinion about the IRGC designation in the US has also changed. Former President Trump added the IRGC to the list in 2019 based on allegations that the group has attacked numerous Americans and assassinated former officials. Now, Republican and Democratic senators have both registered their bipartisan opposition to removing the IRGC terrorist label in a nonbinding motion. 

Parties may meet again in Vienna in the coming weeks, but no decision has been made yet. 

Source: commonspace.eu with Politico Europe (Brussels) and Reuters (London).
Picture: Iran’s chief negotiator Ali Bagheri Kani and EU’s Enrique Mora meet in Tehran; Twitter: @AbasAslani 
 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Updated: Kazakhstan approves important constitutional changes

Updated: Kazakhstan approves important constitutional changes

Kazakh voters in a referendum on Sunday approved a new constitution, exit polls showed. Two exit polls said around 87% of voters had backed the new constitution. Turnout stood at 73%, the electoral commission earlier said. The new constitution streamlines the country's parliament, and recreates the office of vice president, which was abolished in 1996. According to the Central Referendum Commission of Kazakhstan, 12,046,617 citizens were eligible to participate in the referendum. 359 international observers and 206 foreign journalists were accredited to monitor the referendum in order to ensure the transparency of the voting process. International organizations monitoring the referendum include the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the CIS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the Organization of Turkic States, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. The Central Referendum Commission must announce the final results of the vote within seven days after the referendum. A total of 10,401 polling stations operated inside and outside the country to organize voting. 71 of them were opened at diplomatic missions in 54 countries. The new Constitution will enter into force on July 1, 2026. After that, elections for a new parliament are planned in the country, and these elections are expected to be organized by the end of August. The position of vice president will be implemented after the formation of the new parliament. The referendum was the fifth in the history of independent Kazakhstan and leads to the adoption of a new fundamental law that will determine the direction of the country's political and legal development in the coming years. The Referendum was held at the initiative of the President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev and envisages the implementation of large-scale constitutional reforms in the country. According to the submitted draft, approximately 84 percent of the text of the Constitution has been updated and new articles and sections have been developed. The question on the ballot paper asks, "Do you accept the new Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan?" Voters express their position by answering "for" or "against" this question. Currently, the Constitution adopted on August 30, 1995, is in force in Kazakhstan. Since its adoption, the document has been repeatedly amended and supplemented. The latest amendments entered into force in September 2022. However, the scale of the proposed reforms necessitated the preparation of a new Constitutional document. Thus, the amendments cover approximately 84 percent of the text of the existing basic law. The draft of the new Constitution was presented to the public in early February 2026. After the document was published, the country's citizens were given more than a month to familiarize themselves with it and discuss the proposed changes. (Click the picture to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)