Armenian President says defining the status of Karabakh must come first

Serzh Sargsyan told the congress of the ruling  RPA  "as long as the status of Artsakh remains uncertain, no other issue can be solved" since this was the main problem, and everything else was "collateral"

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan on Saturday (26 November) gave a wide-ranging speech at the opening of the 16th Convention of the ruling Republican Party of Armenia (RPA), of which he is also Chairman.

After dealing with a number of domestic and international issues, President Sargsyan used the speech to set out the Armenian position regarding how the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh can be resolved, stressing that defining the status of Nagorno-Karabakh must come first, and that everything else is, according to the official English translation of the speech published on the President's website, "collateral". This seems to contradict what has so far seemed to be the understanding within the ongoing negotiations facilitated by the OSCE Minsk group co-chair, that a step-by-step approach will lead to a decision on the final status, as a last issue to be defined.

The website of the Armenian president carried an English translation of the speech in which the president is quoted as saying the following:

"Our position remains unaltered: the problem of Nagorno-Karabakh can be solved exclusively through the free self-determination of the people of Artsakh. All other problems are collateral. All other issues will find their logical and fair solution, in parallel with the resolution of the problem. As long as this main problem exists, as long as the status of Artsakh remains uncertain, no other issue can be solved".

This statement seems to exclude the possibility that a peace plan can be implemented that will see Armenia release territories it has occupied around Nagorno-Karabakh back to Azerbaijan, for an interim status to be agreed, and for discussions and decisions on a final status for Karabakh to be dealt with as the final stage of the package.

Commonsapce.eu political editor said in a comment that this leaves the so-called "Madrid principles," that have been long flaunted as the sine qua non of a Karabakh peace process, in something of a limbo, Furthermore, it leaves the so-called "Lavrov ideas", the carefully crafted variation of the Madrid principles which have somewhat superseded the latter as the basis for negotiations, but which have never been made public, in tatters. They have been assumed to include a provision for Armenian withdrawal from some of the territories around Nagorno-Karabakh as a first step, leaving the issue of status for later.

With the Foreign Ministers of the two countries expected to meet in Hamburg around 8 December, on the margins of the Ministerial Council of the OSCE, it is now not clear what are going to be basis of those discussions.

Only recently, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliev, in a reference to the status of Nagorno-Karabakh in the framework of a conflict resolution agreement, said that the maximum level of autonomy that Azerbaijan was ready to envisage was that of an autonomous republic within Azerbaijan, This also at the time seemed to be jumping the gun, since discussions up to now had been based on the assumption that the final status of Nagorno-Karabakh would be decided by plebiscite, as the final step in a peace agreement. It could be that both leaders are simply setting markers for the discussions, and are willing to be more flexible in the course of negotiations. Given the history of these negotiations however this is unlikely."

You can read the full version of the speech of president Serzh Sargsyan to the 16th Convention of the republican Party of Armenia, held in Yerevan on Saturday, 26 November 2016, on the website of the Armenian presidency here.

 

Source: commonspace.eu with the press service of the president of Armenia

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Finland hosts European Arctic Summit

Finland hosts European Arctic Summit

The Arctic summit of European leaders will be held in Rovaniemi, a municipality in Northern Finland on 13–14 September. Prime Minister Petteri Orpo has invited a group of EU leaders to the summit. The aim of the summit is to strengthen the EU’s common strategic approach to the Arctic region as its geopolitical significance continues to grow rapidly. “The Arctic region is an increasingly important part of Europe's security environment. The European Union has direct interests in its stability, security and sustainable development. It is very valuable to be able to discuss these issues together with a comprehensive group of EU leaders,” said Orpo. The summit will be attended by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Prime Minister of Poland Donald Tusk, Prime Minister of Denmark Mette Frederiksen, Prime Minister of Estonia Kristen Michal, Prime Minister of Latvia Andris Kulbergs, President of Lithuania Gitanas Nausėda and President of Romania Nicușor Dan. President of the European Council António Costa and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas will also take part in the summit. The summit is taking place against an extremely dynamic backdrop. In the face of accelerating climate change and geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, the economic importance of the northeast passage is growing. For 2026, more than forty million tonnes of freight are expected to pass through the Northern Sea Route for the first time, primarily due to expanded trade between Russia and China. Furthermore, in August, China launched its first regular container service through the Arctic. Finally, the EU’s Arctic policy itself is set for a reorientation: the Commission intends to present an updated Arctic strategy this autumn, in which security is to play a central role for the first time. Kaja Kallas had already advocated for this at the Arctic Frontiers conference in Tromsø earlier this year, stating that the Arctic needed more attention, more resources, and more hard power. The summit in Rovaniemi can therefore also be seen as a dress rehearsal for the new strategy. Finland brings a unique perspective to this debate: over 95 per cent of Finland’s foreign trade in goods is conducted by sea, and its ports freeze over almost every winter. This structural peculiarity has given rise to a strong export sector in the field of icebreakers: Finnish companies have designed around 80 per cent of all icebreakers worldwide and built around 60 per cent; even the US Coast Guard is having the first vessels of its new Arctic Security Cutter class built in Finland because the domestic alternative could not meet the schedule. The fact that this leverage can also be utilised geopolitically has already been successfully demonstrated. At the end of September 2022, the Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs refused to grant an export licence for an LNG icebreaker ordered by the Russian mining group Norilsk Nickel, thereby bringing to an end a project that would have created around 2,100 person-years of employment. (click the image to read more).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)