"NATO and Armenia share many political priorities and security interests."

Of the three countries in the South Caucasus, Armenia was at first the most reluctant to establish relations with NATO. Its special relations with Russia and its membership in the Collective Security Treaty Organisation made it more cautious in its relationship with the Atlantic Alliance. A sign that things may be changing was the visit yesterday of Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan to NATO Headquarters in Brussles.

The President met the Secretary General of NATO Anders Fogh Rasmussen, and addressed the representatives of the NATO member states gathered in the North Atlantic Council.

In a press comment Rasmussen said “NATO and Armenia share many political priorities and security interests”. He added,  ”and we have built up our cooperation and dialogue over many years. Our relationship contributes to regional security and Euro-Atlantic security. And we want to take it forward in that way”.

On his part the Armenian President expressed his country's willingness to continue co-operation with NATO. Sargsyan said "I am also glad that the Secretary General and NATO overall highly value Armenia’s efforts in maintaining global peace and security. We realize that current threats and challenges can be defeated only through our collective efforts. For that very reason, last summer we tripled the number of the Armenian troops participating in the international force which support security in Afghanistan."

During his visit to Brussels the Armenian leader is also expected to meet the leadership of the European Union.

source: commonspace.eu

photo: The President of Armenian Serz Sargsyan at the Headuqarters of NATO in Brussels on 6 March 2012. (picture courtesy of the NATO Press and Information Service).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Nearly half a million Russians killed in Ukraine but Moscow far from reaching its objectives

Nearly half a million Russians killed in Ukraine but Moscow far from reaching its objectives

Nearly half a million Russians have died in fighting in Ukraine, as Vladimir Putin continues to push his country to the brink. His aim of completely controlling the Donbass region, which he annexed after invading Ukraine in 2022, seems more distant than ever. After a bleak winter which saw months of fierce Russian bombing of Ukrainian energy infrastructure, the future is beginning to look more positive for Kyiv Russia’s frontline advances have slowed almost to a halt, as Ukrainian counter-attacks and defensive tactics become more effective. Successes in local counterattacks have become more frequent, as Ukrainian forces scale up their use of ground robots and sshort-range drone warfare. The Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) paints a bleak picture of Russian casualties. Between February 2022 and June 2026, there have been as many as 450,000 Russian battlefield deaths and 1.4 million casualties, it says. The UK’s biggest spy agency, GCHQ, has produced a similar figure. In May, GCHQ director Anne Keast-Butler said in her inaugural public speech that nearly 500,000 Russian soldiers had been killed. The massive death toll is a product of several factors, including an attritional warfare strategy in which Moscow sends thousands of troops towards fortified Ukrainian defences, attempting to grind Kyiv’s forces down with sheer manpower. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)