Nalbandian says Karabakh to have "status quo plus"

The Foreign Minister of Armenia Edward Nalbandian spoke about the latest developments in the negotiations over the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict at an event at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London. The Armenian Foreign Minister stated that before the final settlement Nagorno Kharabakh will have an interim status that must be fixed internationally.

According to Nalbandyan, this is what the mediators suggested and the Azerbaijani President agreed with in Prague in May 2009. The interim status means “status quo plus”, i.e. all that Nagorno Karabakh possesses today plus the international recognition of the status, said the minister.

Commenting on the statement of his Azerbaijani counterpart that it is senseless to waste much time on the coordination of basic principles and it will be more correct to start the drafting of the peace agreement immediately, Edward Nalbandyan said that in this way Azerbaijan is trying to “get rid of” the basic principles suggested by the mediators and “kill” the process of the recent years.

source: commonspace.eu with reporting from Mediamax.am

photo: courtesy of the Armenian Foreign Ministry

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
UN Security Council approves Gaza Peace Plan

UN Security Council approves Gaza Peace Plan

Unlike earlier drafts, the resolution references a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood. It is language several council members pushed for. Israel strongly opposes the creation of a Palestinian state - a significant hurdle in the path to future statehood. Key Arab states had pressured drafters of the resolution to include Palestinian self-determination in the text. The UN secretary general's spokesperson stressed that the resolution needed to "translate... into concrete and urgently needed steps on the ground" and lead to "a political process for the achievement of the two-state solution". The US, the Palestinian Authority, and several Arab and Muslim-majority nations including Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey have called for the quick adoption of the resolution. The Palestinian Authority (PA) said in a statement that the resolution's terms needed to be implemented "urgently and immediately". Russia and China did not exercise the vetoes they possess, but abstained to allow the resolution to pass, largely because the PA and eight other Arab and Muslim nations backed it.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
UN Security Council approves Gaza Peace Plan

UN Security Council approves Gaza Peace Plan

Unlike earlier drafts, the resolution references a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood. It is language several council members pushed for. Israel strongly opposes the creation of a Palestinian state - a significant hurdle in the path to future statehood. Key Arab states had pressured drafters of the resolution to include Palestinian self-determination in the text. The UN secretary general's spokesperson stressed that the resolution needed to "translate... into concrete and urgently needed steps on the ground" and lead to "a political process for the achievement of the two-state solution". The US, the Palestinian Authority, and several Arab and Muslim-majority nations including Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey have called for the quick adoption of the resolution. The Palestinian Authority (PA) said in a statement that the resolution's terms needed to be implemented "urgently and immediately". Russia and China did not exercise the vetoes they possess, but abstained to allow the resolution to pass, largely because the PA and eight other Arab and Muslim nations backed it.