Nalbandian says Karabakh to have "status quo plus"

The Foreign Minister of Armenia Edward Nalbandian spoke about the latest developments in the negotiations over the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict at an event at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London. The Armenian Foreign Minister stated that before the final settlement Nagorno Kharabakh will have an interim status that must be fixed internationally.

According to Nalbandyan, this is what the mediators suggested and the Azerbaijani President agreed with in Prague in May 2009. The interim status means “status quo plus”, i.e. all that Nagorno Karabakh possesses today plus the international recognition of the status, said the minister.

Commenting on the statement of his Azerbaijani counterpart that it is senseless to waste much time on the coordination of basic principles and it will be more correct to start the drafting of the peace agreement immediately, Edward Nalbandyan said that in this way Azerbaijan is trying to “get rid of” the basic principles suggested by the mediators and “kill” the process of the recent years.

source: commonspace.eu with reporting from Mediamax.am

photo: courtesy of the Armenian Foreign Ministry

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Opinion: Women, Peace and Security: Words Endure, but Government Action Lags

Opinion: Women, Peace and Security: Words Endure, but Government Action Lags

Twenty-five years ago, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1325, which recognised what women around the world had long demonstrated through their actions: that peace cannot be built without them, and that gender justice is essential for true security. Resolution 1325 recognised that women must be included in peace processes, and that conflict affects women and girls differently. Over the years, the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda has produced an extensive body of rhetoric: national action plans, reporting frameworks, new Security Council resolutions and regular open debates.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Opinion: Women, Peace and Security: Words Endure, but Government Action Lags

Opinion: Women, Peace and Security: Words Endure, but Government Action Lags

Twenty-five years ago, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1325, which recognised what women around the world had long demonstrated through their actions: that peace cannot be built without them, and that gender justice is essential for true security. Resolution 1325 recognised that women must be included in peace processes, and that conflict affects women and girls differently. Over the years, the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda has produced an extensive body of rhetoric: national action plans, reporting frameworks, new Security Council resolutions and regular open debates.