More questions than answers after Georgia EU visa deal blocked by Germany

Georgia's hopes of an agreement with the European Union to let Georgian tourists travel freely in the Schengen zone were dealt a blow on Wednesday evening, when ambassadors from the EU's biggest countries blocked progress on the deal.

Georgian president Giorgi Margvelashvili was in Brussels to lobby for a 'yes' vote, which was blocked by Germany, France and Italy. A meeting of home office ministers is taking place in Luxembourg on Friday, and of foreign office ministers later in the month, where visa issues will be discussed. However, any chance of the deal being in place before the summer now looks improbable.

The ostensible reason for the German move was fear of crime by Georgian citizens. German diplomatic sources said there had been a series of burglaries by Georgian gangs. However, Georgian officials are confused and dismayed by the delays because they had met all of the EU's technical requirements.
Earlier this week, German chancellor Angela Merkel and Georgian prime minister Giorgi Kvirikashvili had a phone conversation in which the two discussed the visa deal, with the Georgian side emphasising the importance of sealing the agreement quickly.

Jean-Claude Juncker, president of the European Commission, Martin Schulz, president of the European Parliament, and European Council President Donald Tusk, who met with Margvelashvili  in Brussels on Wednesday, have all given their support to the deal.

There is "good progress", and  a deal will be "forthcoming soon," Tusk told reporters early on Wednesday. However as the day progressed, it became increasingly apparent the deal would be delayed until at least September.

Germany made two demands before the deal can be reached with Georgia.  Firstly, Tbilisi must take action on the crime issue, the details of which were not specified. Secondly, the parliament should ratify a "suspension mechanism" letting EU states freeze visa waivers if lots of nationals overstay, or claim asylum.

“There are lots of questions, but no clear answers. I can honestly tell you I don’t understand it," the Georgian president told EU Observer. “You can hardly imagine how this would echo in other countries [in the region] when they are looking at the Georgian case. What will be their conclusions about the credibility of European processes?”

A Schengen visa allows visa-free travel to 26 of the EU's 28 member states, excluding the UK and Ireland.

“Eastern European countries, especially the Baltic states, want the visa issue to be cleared up as soon as possible," an unnamed EU diplomat told EU Observer. “They’re saying that if we don’t give the visa waiver to Georgians, then they will look to Russia instead”.

SOURCE: commonspace.eu and agencies

PHOTO: Margvelashvili and Tusk in Brussels (consilium.europa.eu)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)