LIVE BLOG - The European Parliament vote on visa free travel for Georgians - 2 February 2017

Live blog 0 updates

This live blog is now closed.

13.00 Brussels / 16.00 Tbilisi

We are now bringing this live blog to a close. The European Parliament around midday today adopted by a huge majority a report which recommended giving Georgians visa free travel to EU Schengen countries. This measure, which has been under consideration for some years, is now likely to become operative from the end of March of this year. The decision was warmly welcomed in Georgia and marks an important step in Georgia's European journey. We will continue following this story and other issues related to relations between georgia and the European Union in our daily stories on commonspace.eu.

12.55 Brussels / 15.55 Tbilisi

Georgian Political Analyst Ghia Abashidze told commonspace.eu, 

"Truly a historic day amid world’s current developments. We heard clearly from Brussels - Let Europe stand firm with Georgia as Georgia stands firm with European values in spite of its numerous challenges. I do hope that Georgia's friend and ally Ukraine will share this celebration very soon"

12.45 Brussels/ 15.45 Tbilisi

Georgians are sharing congratulatory messages following the decision of the European parliament to adopt a report endorsing visa free travel for Georgian cittizens.

Prime Minister Giorgi Kvirkashvili tweeted

 

 

A similar message was sent out by the President of Georgia, Giorgi Margvelashvili

 

 

 

12.00 Brussels / 15.00 Tbilisi

The European parliament has voted overwhelmingly to support a measure that grants Georgians visa free travel to EU Schengen countries. The vote was  553 MEPs in favour, 66 were against, and  28 abstained.

11.50 Brussels / 14.50 Tbilisi

We hear there is a big cake with the Georgian and EU flags ready to be cut in the Georgian parliament where MPs and journalists are anxiously awaiting the vote in the European parliament expected now in the next minutes.

 

11.41 Brussels / 14.41 Tbilisi

The Chairman of the Georgian Parliament, Irakli Kobakhidze, has just arrived in the plenary session of the parliament and has been officially welcomed. He will be present when the vote is taken shortly.

In Tbilisi meantime, MPs are gathered in the lobby of the Parliament buikding, where they are joined by many journalists watching the proceedings in Brussels. This is truly a historical moment for Georgia, and there is obviously a lot of interest, and even emotion. (Photo below is a screen grab from Rustavi 2 TV)

11.40 Brussels / 14.40 Tbilisi

I think it is important at this point to recall that many people have put huge efforts to get this measure adopted in these difficult times, as Prime Minister Kvirikashvili mentioned this morning. David Bakradze, the former State Minister for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration was instrumental in the negotiations that took place in 2014-16. Another key person, whose contribution to the process, and whose role is not always fully appreciated, is the Georgian Ambassador to the European Union Natalie Sabanadze. The Oxford educated Sabanadze became Georgia's ambassador to Belgium, Luxembourg and the head of the Georgian mission to the European Union in May, 2013 and has been the key person steering the negotiations for georgia in Brussels. On the European side, apart from the many officials in the EU institutions, the rapporteurs Mariya Gabriel and Andreij Mamekins were absolutely instrumental for the measure to be steered through the different political icebergs that face any sort of EU legislation or legislative measure.

Ambassador Nathalie Sabanadze

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.30 Brussels / 14.30 Tbilisi

Georgian State Minister for European Integration, Victor Dolidze, has just appeared on TV stations explaing to Georgians why they cannot go to Europe without visa tomorrow - because of the procedures that remain to occur.Screen Grab of Victor Dolidze talking on visa liberalisation on Georgian TV

 

11.15 Brussels /14.15 Tbilisi

An interesting angle to this whole discussion is how will this impact the residents in Georgia's secessionist regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. The de facto authorities claim they are independent states, but ofcourse this is not recognised by EU and EU member states - as well as most countries of the world. Georgia's Minister  Minister for Reconciliation and Civil Equality Issues Ketevan Tsikhelashvili said this morning that the challenge ahead was to find ways in which the benefits of the visa liberalisation measures can also be extended to the inhabitants of the separatist territories.

She said, "all benefits of cooperation formats with the EU or other partners should be available for those living in Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region. Visa-free travel is one of the particular benefits every single Georgian will be able to enjoy and our task is to make it as easily available for Abkhazians and Ossetians as possible,' she said. ‘We also plan for biometric passport to be more easily available for those living in occupied territories', she added.

11.00 Brussels / 14.00 Tbiisi

We welcome to those who have joined us on this live blog as we cover events in the European parliament where a vote is scheduled to take place in the early afternoon on extending visa free travel for Georgian citizens. You can also follow us on facebook or on twitter with the hashtag #WelcomeGeorgians

Someone has asked us, so will Georgians be able to travel to the European Union without visa tomorrow? Our political editor told us "Well, nothing in the EU is so simple or fast, but certainly we are at the end of the journey on this issue. This morning, European Parliament rapporteur Marija Gabriel told the Georgian TV station Rustavi 2 that she expects that the legislative measure being adopted today will become a law by 2 March, after which it will be published in the official gazette of the EU a week later.The law will become operative twenty days after that. So it means Georgians will be able to travel visa free by 1 April - and no it will not be an April fools joke but the realisation of a long and difficult process".

10.55 Brussels / 13.55 Tbilisi

The debate in the European parliament has now ended, with the MEPs overwhelmingly supporting the measure. We expect the vote in the next hours. Our correspondent in Tbilisi says that Georgian social media sites are expressing great appreciation for the very positive remarks in the European Parliament - a sense of pride, but also a sense of appreciation.

 

10.51 Brussels / 13.51 Tbilisi

Gabriel says this is not just a gesture but a tangible expression of support, and she urges members to vote for the measure.

10.50 Brussels/ 13.50 Tbilisi

The EU Commissioner in charge of this issue has just concluded the debate, saying there is no need to delay the vote any more and the measure should be voted. The Rapporteur Marija Gabriel is now doing the winding-up.

10.45 Brussels/ 13.45  Tbilisi

MEPs from across Europe are expressing support for the motion to extend visa free travel to Georgians. One Baltic MEP said "We in the EU dont build walls, we build partnerships"

10.40 Brussels/ 13.40 Tbilisi

The debate in the European Parliament has now started and MEPs are expressing their views. Opinions are overwhelmingly in favour.

You can watch live on the European Parliament website

 

10.30 Brussels /13.30 Tbilisi

A high level delegation from the Georgian Parliament is in Brussels and will be watching closely the proceedings in the European Parliament. The delegation is headed by the Chairman of Parliament Irakli Kobakhidze, who is making his first visit to brussels since taking office. Kobakhidze is accompanied by several senior MPs, including the Chair of the Foreign Affairs Comittee, Sophiko Katsarava and the Chair of the European Affairs Committee, Tamar Khulordava and her 1st Deputy Chair, Irine Pruidze, as well as the Deputy Chairs of the Foreign Relations Committee, Nino Goguadze and Dimitri Tskitishvili, as well as the Chief of the Speaker's Cabinet, Nikoloz Samkharadze. 

Yesterday they were busy meeting the different groups in the European Parliament. All the major groups, including the European Peoople's Party and the Socialist and Democrats, have already expressed their support for the measure to be voted today, so no surprises are expected.

Irakli Kobakhdize later told journalists that visa-free travel regime for the citizens of Georgia with the Schengen zone countries will be another important milestone in moving closer to the EU. Kobakhidze thanked European Parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee for supporting Georgia's euro-integration process. The sides spoke about the democratic processes in Georgia and the activities of the Constitutional Commission as well.

 

10.20 (Brussels)/ 13.20 (Tbilisi)

Today’s vote in the European Parliament is of course awaited with great interest in Georgia itself. This morning, Prime Minister Giorgi Kvirikashvili spoke about it when addressing the weekly meeting of the Cabinet of Ministers, describing it as a historic day

 

Georgian PM Giorgi Kvirikashvili speaking at a conference in batumi in July 2016 Kvirikashvili said, ‘I would like to thank to all MEPs that will take part in today’s voting as this day is of historic importance for Georgia. I would also like to thank to all public servants that have contributed to the great success. I would like to express my gratitude to the parliament of Georgia and to all those that have participated in this process that resulted in a big success for Georgia,’ the PM has remarked.  According to him, today’s decision will confirm concrete results of being close to the EU.  The prime minister called on Georgians “to show great responsibility and obey the laws of those countries that they will visit as a result of this measure”.

xxxxxxxxxx

Those following this blog can also do so on facebook and on twitter, where we are using the hashtag #WelcomeGeorgians

 

 

 

10.15 (Brussels)/ 13.15 (Tbilisi)

Discussions on lifting the visa requirement for Georgians wanting to travel to Europe have been going on for several years. The Georgian government hoped that it could conclude the discussions in 2016, and put huge efforts into implementing the reforms that were asked from it by the EU as a condition for this measure. Things however got delayed as a result of external factors - including the European Union's difficulties in tackling a huge refugee and migration crisis that saw million trying to enter the EU from countries in Africa and the Middle East. At a time when the emphasis was on tightening border controls, relaxing the entry requirements for millions of people was not a popular measure with the electorates in many countries and several EU governments wanted safeguards in place. In essence this is the reason for the delay. Not surprisingly the delays have caused huge frustrations  among the Georgian public. But two factors remained constant, and helped to ensure that Georgia and the EU stayed the course: the first is support in Georgia for European and Euro-Atlantic integration has remained solidly positive. This support reflects itself also in the position of most political parties, including the governing Georgian Dream party and the two wings of the opposition UNM, which have recently separated. The second factor is that conversely, support for Georgia within the European Union - the institutions, the member states, the parliament, and wider public opinion, remained high, and remained solid. Today's vote will be the ultimate proof of that.

So what is the vote about?

In technical terms it is a draft law giving Georgian citizens the right to travel to the EU without a visa. Biometric passport holders will be able to enter the Schengen area for 90 days within any 180-day period for a holiday, business or any other purpose, except working.

Negotiators from the European Parliament and Council (representing the 28 member states) negotiators struck a deal on the legislation last December. The visa waiver will enter into force on the same date as the visa suspension mechanism, which allows EU member states to temporarily reintroduce visa requirements for reasons of public security.

**********************

10.05 (Brussels) /13.05 (Tbilisi)

Today's vote in the European parliament is the climax of years of complex negotiations. Relations between Georgia and the European Union go back to the early 1990s when Georgia regained its independence after the collapse of the USSR. The European Union was one of the first international organisations to engage with Georgia - initially offering emergency humanitarian aid to alleviate the suffering of massive poverty and displacement caused by the collapse of the Soviet Union and the conflicts . The European Union opened a delegation in Georgia way back in 1994, and soon after Georgia and the EU signed a Partnership and Co-operation Agreement.

Commonspace.eu political editor writes:

For Georgians, Europe is not simply an economic project, nor just a political alliance: it is a national vocation embedded in the sense of identity of the Georgian nation. Georgia has engaged with the EU for twenty-five years with missionary zeal, summarised simply but powerfully by Georgia's late statesman Zurab Zhvania in his first address to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe - "I am Georgian and therefore I am European". There were on the way many ups and downs, but eventually Georgia became an Associate member of the EU through the Association Agreement signed in 2014, and which came into force last summer. Visa free travel is not a part of that agreement, but is a crucial add-on that would make the hundreds of pages of association agreement tangibly relevant to the entire Georgian nation. The visa liberalisation measure has therefore assumed an importance for Georgians, and for Georgia's relations with the EU, that is far greater than would be the case with other countries.

***********

 It is ten o'clock in the morning in Brussels and one o'clock in the afternoon Tbilisi on Thursday, 2 February 2017.

Welcome to this live blog on commonspace.eu. We will be following the vote scheduled to take place in the plenary session of the European Parliament in a few hours time on the proposal to give Georgian citizens the possibility of travelling to European Union countries for business or tourism purposes without visa.

We will follow events in the parliament and hear from our correspondents in Brussels and Tbilisi.

 

 

 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine and Russia could see European countries join the next round of peace negotiations, following talks between US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Thursday (November 12). However, conflicting positions over European military involvement, Ukraine’s territorial future and the continent’s security arrangements highlight the difficulties facing the diplomatic process. Speaking after the meeting, Witkoff said European participation would be an important development, describing the countries concerned as key partners. Kushner also indicated that Washington had noticed a shift in European attitudes and believed their involvement would not obstruct progress. In a statement published on X, he said the expanded discussions would address broader European security arrangements alongside territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine. The US envoys subsequently travelled to Dublin, where they met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a European summit. Zelenskyy welcomed the possibility of European participation and expressed hope that the negotiations would include measures to reduce tensions and establish ceasefires. He also reiterated the importance of European representation in decisions concerning the continent’s security. Moscow, however, has offered a more cautious interpretation of the proposed expansion. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, suggested that European countries should first reconsider their military assistance to Kyiv, arguing that their current actions demonstrated an unwillingness to pursue peace. Putin similarly called on Washington to work with its European allies to establish whether they genuinely wanted peace or continued confrontation with Russia. The Russian president also rejected the prospect of European peacekeeping troops being deployed to Ukraine following a potential agreement, describing such a presence as a continuation of the war. His position reflects wider disagreements over the future European security architecture, with Moscow seeking discussions on the continent's broader security arrangements, while European leaders insist that such negotiations cannot replace a settlement of the war. Simultaneously, Zelenskyy raised concerns about disruptions to Starshield, the US-made satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces. He described Washington’s discussions with Moscow about Europe's future security as unusual and warned against decisions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the diplomatic activity, fighting continued. Russian drone attacks killed two people in Ukraine's Sumy region and injured five in Rivne, while a separate attack in Russia's Belgorod region killed one person and injured four. Ukrainian agricultural company Kernel Holding also suspended operations at all its oilseed extraction facilities following repeated Russian attacks.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)