James Warlick interview with APA News Agency on 12 March 2015.

The US co-Chair of the OSCE Minsk Process, Ambassador James Warlick, spoke to the Azerbaijani news agency APA about the state of the peace process. We reproduce it here in full


How do you characterize the situation on the line of contact after your recent visit to the region?

The situation along the Line of Contact remains tense, but has stabilized since the end of January. We urge the sides to strictly adhere to the ceasefire to create a more conducive atmosphere for peace negotiations. Also, with religious holidays, commemorations, and other events in the region, it is in the interest of the parties to maintain a period of quiet.

You stated that the main purpose of the visit was to call on the conflicting sides to maintain ceasefire? Did you make any specific proposals during the visit?

The Presidents confirmed their commitment to the peaceful resolution of the conflict, and they agreed to consider proposals to strengthen the ceasefire. Our proposals would reduce the likelihood of incidents that could lead to an escalation of tensions. We are hopeful that the sides can agree to these and other measures.

During your last visit to the region you met with ICRC representatives. Before that Assistant Secretary Victoria Nuland called on Armenia to make humanitarian gesture and release Azerbaijani hostages. Are there any progress?

The two Azerbaijani citizens remain imprisoned. We reiterate our conviction that the release of all prisoners held by the sides is an important humanitarian gesture.

Armenia demands de-facto NK regime's (authorities) participation in the negotiation process. How negatively it may influence the process?

The interests of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh will have to be taken into account in a negotiation process. This is why the Co-Chairs travel to Nagorno-Karabakh and meet with the de facto authorities and other members of the community.

Do you have any plans related with the two countries foreign ministers' meeting?

We hope to bring the two Foreign Ministers together at the appropriate time, and are in close contact with them. While we believe such dialogue is useful, it is ultimately their decision whether to meet.

In your statement you mentioned on your plans regarding the two countries presidents' meeting. Could you tell about preparation to this meeting and when it may take place? During your last interview you stated that you do not want meeting for show. What are you planning to do in order to avoid meetings for show?

At the Paris Summit in October 2014, the Presidents committed to intensify their dialogue this year. They reaffirmed their readiness to meet later this year during the Co-Chairs' recent trip to the region. We are working with the Foreign Ministers to prepare a substantive agenda for the Presidents' next meeting in order to narrow differences between the sides on the key issues of a settlement.

source: commonspace.eu with APA News Agency, Baku

photo: Ambassador James Warlick (archive picture).

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Mark Carney: "The world is in the midst of a rupture, not a transition"

Mark Carney: "The world is in the midst of a rupture, not a transition"

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said the "old order is not coming back" and urged fellow middle powers to come together in a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. "Middle powers must act together because if we're not at the table, we're on the menu," Carney said on Tuesday, adding that he believed powerful nations were using economic coercion to get what they want. He also affirmed Canada's support for Greenland, Denmark and the Nato alliance, drawing applause. "Great powers" are often defined as countries with permanent seats on United Nations Security Council - China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States - which shows their economic and military dominance in the world. Middle powers, such as Canada, Australia, Argentina, South Korea and Brazil, are nations that still exert large influence in global politics, even though their economies are smaller. In his speech, Carney said the world is "in the midst of a rupture, not a transition". "Great powers have begun using economic integration as weapons, tariffs as leverage, financial infrastructure as coercion, supply chains as vulnerabilities to be exploited," he said. He also said "Canada was amongst the first to hear the wake-up call" that geography and historic alliances no longer guaranteed security or prosperity. As a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato), Canada stands firmly with Greenland and Denmark and supports "their unique right to determine Greenland's future", Carney said in his speech. "Our commitment to Article Five is unwavering," the prime minister added, referring to a clause in the Nato agreement that states an attack against one member state is considered an attack on all. (read the full speech of the Canadian prime minister at Davos by clicking the picture).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)