"A surprisingly suspenseful summit". Richard Giragosian says that after Vilnius a new EU approach to Russia is going to be necessary.

Those used to attending EU summits and other heads of government meetings are usually resigned to long hours of tedious negotiations and long communiques that aim to please one and all. There will be some of that in Vilnius too, but as Richard Giragosian, Director of the indepenedent Armenian think tank Regional Studies Centre says as the Lithuanian Presidency of the Council of the European Union hosts the third Eastern Partnership Summit in Vilnius, it is clear that this summit is very different.

In a comment to commonspace.eu, Giragosian, who is in Vilnius to participate at one of the many side events that are being organised by the Lithiuanian Presidency on the margins of the summit, says that 

"Vilnius is the arena for a showdown between Russia and several former Soviet states. For the past several years, many of Russia's neighbors have been engaged in a determined attempt to deepen ties to the EU, with reforms that were expected to be capped by new Association Agreements and related Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) agreements.

But this Vilnius Summit has already been defined by a new degree of suspense and surprise, rooted in a sudden move by Moscow to derail the process".

Giragosian adds that the first casualty in this new Russian campaign of pressure and coercion was Armenia, which was forced to abandon its long-awaited Association Agreement with the EU.

"But in many ways, Armenia was merely a sacrificial pawn in Russia's broader strategic chess game. For Moscow the real prize was Ukraine, which has now bowed to Russian pressure and will also miss a strategic opportunity to deepen ties with the EU."

Richard Giragosian suggests that Vilnius may have failed before it started, and post Vilnius a new strategy of containing Russian resurgence is going to be necessary:

"Although the only remaining survivors appear to be Moldova and Georgia, as each country remains firm in its committment to its respective Association Agreements, the Vilnius Summit has already failed, even before it has begun. For the EU, the summit will offer meager results, with a litany of disappointment and despair among the other Eastern Partnership countries. But the clear lesson from Vilnius is the danger to under-estimate Russia. And the current challenge is how to counter, if not contain this resurgence of Russian power. This also means that the EU will need to devise new ways to bolster these weakened states, whose only crime was to challenge Moscow by looking Westward, beyond the confines of Russia's enforcement of its "near abroad" as its exclusive sphere of influence."

Commonspace.eu political aditor commented that "So far the leadership of the European Union has remained upbeat about the Summit, even holding out hopes that Ukraine may make a last minute comeback to its original intention of signing an Association Agreement with the EU in Vilnius. This is becoming increasingly unlikely. Vilnius should be an opportunity for plain speaking. If EU countries are able to speak with one voice than all, including Russia, will have to stop and listen. Twenty eight different voices are likely to be much less audible."


source: commonspace.eu

photo: One of the venues for the Vilnius Summit due to open tomorrow.


 

Related articles

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)