"A surprisingly suspenseful summit". Richard Giragosian says that after Vilnius a new EU approach to Russia is going to be necessary.

Those used to attending EU summits and other heads of government meetings are usually resigned to long hours of tedious negotiations and long communiques that aim to please one and all. There will be some of that in Vilnius too, but as Richard Giragosian, Director of the indepenedent Armenian think tank Regional Studies Centre says as the Lithuanian Presidency of the Council of the European Union hosts the third Eastern Partnership Summit in Vilnius, it is clear that this summit is very different.

In a comment to commonspace.eu, Giragosian, who is in Vilnius to participate at one of the many side events that are being organised by the Lithiuanian Presidency on the margins of the summit, says that 

"Vilnius is the arena for a showdown between Russia and several former Soviet states. For the past several years, many of Russia's neighbors have been engaged in a determined attempt to deepen ties to the EU, with reforms that were expected to be capped by new Association Agreements and related Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) agreements.

But this Vilnius Summit has already been defined by a new degree of suspense and surprise, rooted in a sudden move by Moscow to derail the process".

Giragosian adds that the first casualty in this new Russian campaign of pressure and coercion was Armenia, which was forced to abandon its long-awaited Association Agreement with the EU.

"But in many ways, Armenia was merely a sacrificial pawn in Russia's broader strategic chess game. For Moscow the real prize was Ukraine, which has now bowed to Russian pressure and will also miss a strategic opportunity to deepen ties with the EU."

Richard Giragosian suggests that Vilnius may have failed before it started, and post Vilnius a new strategy of containing Russian resurgence is going to be necessary:

"Although the only remaining survivors appear to be Moldova and Georgia, as each country remains firm in its committment to its respective Association Agreements, the Vilnius Summit has already failed, even before it has begun. For the EU, the summit will offer meager results, with a litany of disappointment and despair among the other Eastern Partnership countries. But the clear lesson from Vilnius is the danger to under-estimate Russia. And the current challenge is how to counter, if not contain this resurgence of Russian power. This also means that the EU will need to devise new ways to bolster these weakened states, whose only crime was to challenge Moscow by looking Westward, beyond the confines of Russia's enforcement of its "near abroad" as its exclusive sphere of influence."

Commonspace.eu political aditor commented that "So far the leadership of the European Union has remained upbeat about the Summit, even holding out hopes that Ukraine may make a last minute comeback to its original intention of signing an Association Agreement with the EU in Vilnius. This is becoming increasingly unlikely. Vilnius should be an opportunity for plain speaking. If EU countries are able to speak with one voice than all, including Russia, will have to stop and listen. Twenty eight different voices are likely to be much less audible."


source: commonspace.eu

photo: One of the venues for the Vilnius Summit due to open tomorrow.


 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)