In Tunisia, a questionnaire on constitutional changes attracts minimal public interest

Tunisian President Kais Saied asked for citizens' views in the drafting of the new constitution by organising an online multiple-choice questionnaire. However, the questionnaire is so far not very popular and considered by its opponents as a charade, with only 276,000 people out of 12 million Tunisians.

After dismissing the Parliament last year and subsequently ruling the country by decree, the Tunisian President set up a committee in December 2021 to propose a new constitution to the Tunisian people, who are expected to approve it by referendum in June 2022.

The 64-year-old president stated that his desire to change the constitution was a response to a decade of political and economic stagnation at the hands of a corrupt and self-serving elite.

His most fervent opponents - among them the powerful UGTT labour union - accuse Kais Saied of using this public consultation on the constitution as a facade of inclusiveness while the President imposes his own authoritarian political system.

If the June referendum were to result in a new constitution, it would replace the 2014 constitution, considered by Westerners and Tunisians at the time to be a sound example of compromise between Tunisia's conflicting political factions, thus avoiding a dangerous polarisation.

However, the compromises reached in crafting the 2014 constitution led to some parliamentary paralysis, due to the introduction of a mixed parliamentary and presidential system.

Therefore, when Kais Saied won in the second round of the presidential election in 2019 by a wide margin, his victory was interpreted by observers as a rejection of the entire Tunisian political elite.

In fact, one of the questions in the online questionnaire on the constitution asks whether citizens prefer a parliamentary, presidential, or mixed system.

However, Tunisians’ concerns do not seem to focus on constitutional issues but rather on more practical matters including high unemployment, inflation, and the shortage of certain goods. Many users wrote on the presidency's social media feed saying they were online, but needed bread.

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with Reuters (London), Alaraby News (London) and other media outlets
Picture: Tunisian President Kais Saied; Twitter: @AmbGordonGray

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)