Trouble in Lilliput: South Ossetian politics in crisis

Politics in South Ossetia often takes a Lilliputian character. The tiny territory that seceded from Georgia after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and has existed as a Russian protectorate since, is small in size, with a population of around 50,000. Yet its internal politics are often dramatic, with long standing clan feuds playing out in modern political terms. One such crisis appears to be looming

For six months the territory has been gripped by a political crisis in a stand-off between president and parliament. It follows the death whilst in police detention of a young Ossetians, Inal Dzhabiev. His family and clan have pledged vengeance. They wanted the prosecutor general to resign. He didn’t, and 14 out of the 34 members of the territory’s parliament started a boycott of the legislature, depriving it of a quorum.  According to one of the MPs, David Sanakoev, the MPs want the dismissal of the Prosecutor General to be on the agenda of the parliament.

Under the parliament’s rules 23 MPs have to be present for decisions to be made. With the budget not approved, and a raft of other administrative matters brought to gridlock, the situation is now coming to a final showdown.

The government has given the MPs until Tuesday (16 February) to come to the parliament so the budget can be approved, or else…..! Quite what the “or else” is, is not clear.

On Friday (12 February)  18 pro government MPs turned up to listen to complaints from pensioners that had not received their pensions as a result of the stalemate. The president himself, Anatoli Bibilov, also arrived. He accused the opposition of trying to make political capital from the death of Inal Dzhabiev

He said he met with opposition deputies to get them back to work, but they did not come to an agreement even though they received answers to all their questions, because he said “they are not interested in the investigation of the case, their goal is to create chaos”.

The matter becomes more serious because of the involvement of Russia. Russia has bankrolled South Ossetia, especially since it recognised it as an independent state in 2008. More than 80% of the territory's budget comes from Russia. Russian politicians cannot understand how such a tiny place can create so many problems for their geo-strategic ambitions and be so ungrateful. Recently, Moscow sent a delegation from the Federation Council to try to sort out the dispute, but Bibilov said that that did not work either

“We live thanks to Russia, thanks to them we receive pensions and salaries. They are building schools and kindergartens for us, but, nevertheless, many today speak against Russia. What happened to the Ossetian people? Shouldn't we be grateful to our saviours? Just imagine that Russia no longer supports us, what will happen to us. How many good things Konstantin Kosachev himself did to us, in difficult times for our republic he supported us, spoke for us in world platforms. The Russian delegation wanted to convey to the deputies that by their actions they are inflicting a blow on Russia, because Russia gave us independence, ”he said.

Anatoly Bibilov then asked the loyal  deputies to adopt the budget themselves, without waiting for the opposition deputies.

“I once again appeal to you deputies, as a president, who has in the constitution, that he is the guarantor of the observance of the rights of the constitution, the guarantor of human rights, as a person, as an Ossetian - so that they come and give the people their salaries and pensions, so that we, we lived as a republic. It is our duty to serve the people, and we must fulfil this duty.”

Bibilov’s courage however has its limits. He told the MPs he had spoken with Moscow

He also noted that he communicated with colleagues from Moscow, "and they said that we should give them time until Monday."

“They will talk with the deputies and it will be clear by the next week. Probably we will have no other choice but to come and adopt this budget ourselves, ”he concluded.

And thus is the state of the rule of law in the Caucasian Lilliput

Source: commonspace.eu with Caucasian Knot (Moscow), and Cominf.org (Tskhinvali)
Photo: Pensioners attend a meeting in the South Ossetian parliament demanding their pensions.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)