Georgian politics in turmoil

This story will be updated throughout the day

1330 CET (1630 Tbilisi)

Opposition leaders appear adamant in rejecting the result of Saturday's election. They are gathering in front of the parliament with supporters. Some opposition parties have already declared they will boycott parliament.

International and domestic observers have reported a rather mixed set of observations. International observers highlighted that it was a free election with shortcomings, but local observers are more critical of the process.

Some interesting information from ISFED, one of the most credible domestic election observation organisations in Georgia. They conducted parallel vote tabulation (PVT) for the proportional, party-list vote in the October 31 parliamentary elections. Their results largely coincide with the official results based on 3409 precincts from 3847 (88.61%).

The largest gap is in the share of votes received by the ruling Georgian Dream party, where the PVT result is 3 percentage points lower than the CEC result so far.

1300 CET (1600 Tbilisi)

The international observation missions that followed the parliamentary elections have said that "Georgia's parliamentary elections were competitive and, overall, fundamental freedoms were respected. Nevertheless, pervasive allegations of pressure on voters and blurring of the line between the ruling party and the state reduced public confidence in some aspects of the process". "The elections were conducted under a substantially revised legal framework, following broad public consultations that brought some improvements for the holding of democratic elections, but further efforts to address shortcomings are needed." 

They presented their findings at a press conference in Tbilisi this afternoon.

You can read more on the OSCE website here

The full statement is also available on the OSCE website, here

0730 CET (1030 Tbilisi)

Georgia was thrown in political chaos on Sunday (1 November) after opposition parties rejected the results of the parliamentary elections held the previous day, describing them as illegitimate, and calling for street protests.

Domestic election monitoring organisations - Georgian Young Lawyers Association, Transparency International Georgia and ISFED were critical of the process on election day, citing a number of violations. 

Early signs of problems ahead emerged when exit polls commissioned by the political parties themselves, or by TV stations aligned with them, gave widely differing predictions, allowing both sides to claim victory. When official results started coming in however, the ruling Georgian Dream party appeared to be receiving more than 50% of the votes cast, and the opposition immediately cried foul. According to the latest data based on results from about two-thirds of the constituencies 2556 out of 3847 precincts), the result is as follows: 

"Georgian Dream - Democratic Georgia" - 48.8%

"United National Movement - United Opposition is a force in unity" - 26.07%

"European Georgia - Movement for Freedom" -3.79%

"Alliance of Georgian Patriots" - 3.23%

"Strategy Builder" - 3.14%

"Try - 3.23%

Girchi - 2.99%

"Aleko Elisashvili-Citizens" - 1.38%

"Georgian Labor Party" - 1.03%

" Nino Burjanadze - United Georgia-Democratic Movement" - 0.85%

The results being contested relate to the 120 seats elected by proportional party lists. There are also 30 seats elected by a majoritarian system, where the picture appears more nuanced. In all eight constituencies in the capital Tbilisi none of the candidates has overcome the 50% threshold and there will have to be a second round between the candidates of Georgian Dream and those of the main opposition party, the United National Movement. There is a similar situation in some of the other 22 constituencies in the regions.

The opposition has called for street protests starting at 16.00 hours today. The international monitoring missions will also hold a press conference this afternoon to report their findings.

source: commonspace.eu with agencies

photo: Zaal Udumashvili, one of the leaders of the United National Movement party, gestures as party supporters gather in front of the parliament building after exit polls were announced during parliamentary election, in Tbilisi, Georgia, October 31, 2020 (picture courtesy of Reuters, London)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)