China's "no limits" relationship with Russia under strain

China is having to weigh up the economic and political consequences of its “no limits” relationship with Russia as the conflict in Ukraine continues. Ukraine called for some Chinese companies to stop exports to Russia and China faces complications to its flagship “silk road” project.

The Ukrainian vice prime minister wrote to Chinese drone company DJI asking it “to stop doing business with the Russian Federation until the Russian aggression in Ukraine is fully stopped,” saying that Russia is “using DJI products in Ukraine in order to navigate their missile[s] to kill civilians”. Western companies have been quick to suspend operations in Russia, however, Chinese companies are taking a different tack. DJI responded to Ukraine’s claims by denying their products’ had any military capacity. In a tweet posted by the company, they said “all DJI products are designed for civilian use and do not meet military specifications”.

Chinese companies are being severely hurt by Russian actions in Ukraine, with widespread international sanctions hitting exporters hard. A survey of over 300 exporters conducted by FOB Shanghai reported that 39% of firms said the war is undermining their business in Russia.

Similar problems are occurring in the Chinese import industry. Due to the West’s decision to remove Russia from SWIFT, a global financial messaging system, companies are finding it difficult to process payments from Russian firms. A coal trading company in the north-eastern city of Dalian cancelled an order from Russia and its owner said, “There is too much risk trading with Russia.” However, other companies are continuing to trade with Russia. Xibao Metallurgy Materials Group signed a deal to build a new plant in western Russia and a state-owned commodity trader has bought over 50,000 tonnes of coal since the war began.

The Chinese Silk Road Rail Corridor is facing disruptions as German companies respond to sanctions imposed on Russia by Berlin and Brussels. The project is central to the Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing’s landmark scheme to enhance Chinese global economic and political power. Last week, DB Schenker, a logistics provider, announced that it was temporarily suspending “all shipments to and from Russia with immediate effect.” Hapag-Lloyd, another German logistics provider, and the inland port of Duisburg, key for the rail corridor, said the same, noting that insurance companies will likely stop offering coverage for those shipments crossing Russia. Beijing’s balancing act between its “no limits” relationship with Russia and the geopolitical consequences of its actions in Ukraine is thus coming under increasing strain.

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with Financial Times (London), Eurasianet (New York), and other media agencies
Picture: Freight Train sets off from China along Silk Road Rail Corridor (VCG)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.