The bombing of large cities will have grave consequences on civilians

The conflict between Armenians and Azerbaijanis over Nagorno-Karabakh took a turn for the worse on Sunday with serious consequences for civilians from both sides. Large towns and cities like Stepanakert and Ganca came under missile attack or aerial bombardment, causing civilian casulaties. There are reports of other attacks on Azerbaijani cities well away from the conflict zone.

This development helped to remind everybody how different this conflict is from the last full war in the region, which was mainly fought with kalashnikov guns and old Soviet tanks. The billions of dollars worth of weapons that has been sold or given to both sides in the conflict, mainly by Russia, but by others too, is now showing its real purpose. These weapons did not help establish strategic parity between the sides, as some Russian officials often claimed, but are now destroying the peace of the civilian population on both sides.

On Sunday, we were also reminded by the escalation, that this conflict has far from from exhausted itself. Both sides have the potential to escalate dramatically, and the means to do so. The situation may indeed get worse, before it starts getting better.

Both sides claim that they are taking care not to to target civilians. Targeting civilians is a war crime. The increasing number of civilian casualties on both sides means that they are either not taking care enough, or are not indeed concerned. This is a serious matter which the world must watch carefully.

This week we expect to see an intensification of efforts to bring the sides back to negotiations. A simple cease fire will do little to help the process, and may indeed not be acceptable to one or both of the sides. In their defiant speeches over the weekend the Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders showed little appetite for compromise. But compromise they must, for otherwise they will throw their nations not into heavinly glory as they promise, but to the depths of hell. The international community must now also get its act together to decide on a strategy on how to stop the fighting and what comes after. This conflict must be resolved. But first the fighting must stop, the wounds healed, and the dialogue restarted. This will be an uphill task and  only a united international community will be able to help achieve it.

source: commonspace.eu

phtoo: A city miles away from the conflict zone was bombed on Sunday, with the civilianbs bearing a heavy brunt

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)