OPINION: Dennis Sammut - "The South Caucasus is changing in multiple ways"

News.Az interviews Dennis Sammut, executive director of the British organization LINKS.

Can we expect any significant changes in the foreign policy of Armenia after the presidential elections in Armenia?

We can expect continuity in the main thrust of Armenian foreign policy but with some nuanced changes.

Armenia will remain a close ally of Russia and will push for an increase in the role of the Collective Security Treaty Organisations (CSTO). In the economic sphere however Armenia will develop its relations with the European Union. It is likely that Armenia will sign an Association Agreement with the EU in November of this year.

The big question is Armenia’s relations with Turkey. How to manage this is Sargsyan’s biggest challenge. I do not speak about relations with Azerbaijan because this is for Armenia a much bigger issue than just foreign policy.

One of the main postulates in the election campaign of incumbent president of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan became the promise to launch the airport built in occupied Nagorno Karabakh soon. How may this step (if it would be taken) affect the situation in the region?

We have been told that the airport has been ready for nearly one year. The Armenian leadership does not want to be seen provoking a crisis so they are waiting for the right political moment to do so. I am myself in favour of opening the airport, but under some conditions, for example international supervision and solely for civilian use. There is no doubt that if the Armenian leadership acts unilaterally on the issue of the airport this will escalate an already tense situation. It should therefore be avoided.

It seems that the South Caucasus with domestic problems is not in the priority lists of American foreign policy. Moreover there is an opinion that after withdrawal NATO’s troops from Afghanistan American interests in the South Caucasus will decrease?

The United States is a superpower. It can handle multiple problems, so domestic considerations do not affect foreign policy in general, and certainly not the issues related with the South Caucasus. But a situation is emerging whereby the EU is now playing a much more active role in the region. This should not be a surprise. The South Caucasus is part of the EU neighbourhood, and also there are many issues that connect the EU with the region. As for Afghanistan the role of the region in Afghanistan is only a small part of a much bigger agenda between the countries of the region and the US, as well as the EU.

What will be with settlement of Karabakh conflict this year?

I think the fact that the Karabakh peace process is stalled makes the situation very dangerous. As a minimum we should see the restart of proper negotiations. If not the likelihood of a sharp escalation in violence is not only possible but likely. I do not necessarily mean an all out war. Between war and peace there is a big space in which many different things can happen.

What events should be expected in the South Caucasus this year?

Making predictions in the region is never a good idea, because the South Caucasus is always full of surprises. However one thing is certain the region is changing in multiple ways. Some of these changes are planned, others are more spontaneous. But I am more optimistic on the region this year than I was last year, or perhaps I should say, more cautiously optimistic.

Elshan Rustamov
News.Az

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)