Georgia-Armenia relations are in many ways exemplary.

This is a commentary prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu.

President Serzh Sargsyan of Armenia on Friday visited Georgia on an official visit during which he met with President Giorgi Marghvelashvili, Prime Minister Irakli Gharibashvili, and Parliament Chairman David Usupashvili.

The visit was the latest in an exchange of official visits between the two neighbouring countries that go beyond protocol niceties, and emphasises that the two countries have embarked on a process of co-operation on a number of tangible issues.

Armenia and Georgia are neighbouring countries with a shared common history. Their people have interacted, inter-married and lived together for many centuries. A competitive spirit between them whilst at times healthy could also at other times be unnecessarily divisive.

In the current geo-political context the two countries have chosen diametrically different paths - Georgia as an associate member of the European Union with aspirations for full EU and NATO membership; Armenia as a full member already of the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union and Collective Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO). Some feared the two countries could become the fault line between two competing blocs. The leaders of both Armenia and Georgia have made it clear that they do not want this to happen, and the friendly visit of the Armenian President to Tbilisi has re-affirmed this once again. President Sargsyan, speaking after his meeting with president Marghvelashvili underscored this, stating that "our mutual understanding in such issues is first of all conditioned by the acknowledgment of the supremacy of the Armenian-Georgian brotherhood, as well as by our ability to think long-term. Furthermore, the active interstate dialogue anchored in our peoples' deep ties creates serious prerequisites to outline new dimensions for comprehensive partnership".

Georgia is currently pursuing an active policy in the wider Caucasus Region. This means strong bilateral relations with Armenia and Azerbaijan, as well as expanding relations with Turkey and Iran. Georgia's relations with Russia remain troubled by Russia's support for protectorate states in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Georgia can benefit much from expanded regional co-operation, and even its role as an EU associated state will be much enhanced by an active and positive Caucasus policy. The current Georgian leadership has understood this and is pursuing this policy actively.

As for Armenia, the situation is somewhat different. The country is locked in a war with Azerbaijan and in a historical confrontation with Turkey which persists and clouds contemporary relations. For Armenia maintaining a good relationship with Georgia is a strategic priority which successive Armenian leaders have understood.

There are issues in Georgia-Armenian relations, and proximity and interaction bring with them also the potential for disputes. Yet both countries have wisely agreed to work to manage these problems not to try to exacerbate them. The relations between Georgia and Armenia are therefore in many ways exemplary. They have the potential to expand further. And both sides need to be careful not to be complacent, because they are not without their problems. For the moment however both countries have wisely decided to turn, what could have been an awkward situation, to their advantage.

source: This is a commentary prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

photo: The President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan with Georgia's President Giorgi Marghvelashvili at the Presidential Palace in Tbilisi on Friday, 30 October 2015 (picture courtesy of the press service of the President of Armenia).

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)