The first casualty of war is truth. Karabakh is no exception.

This is a commentary prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

For the last ten days fighting on the Armenia-Azerbaijan border, and the line of contact separating opposing forces in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone, has claimed the lives of dozens of soldiers, most of them young Armenian and Azerbaijani conscripts, and injured many more. Civilians have once more also been caught in the cross-fire, and in a disturbing development, representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross have also been fired on.

Both sides accuse each other of starting the fighting. Who really did we will probably never know. Accompanying the shooting has been a campaign of propaganda and disinformation. Each side is simultaneously trying to project itself as both victim and victor. However the real victims are the young people who have been killed or wounded and whose lives have been lost or shattered. Nobody is the victor, except death.

It is said that in any war, the first casualty is truth.This Karabakh conflict is no exception. The people of Armenia and Azerbaijan have for the last twenty years been subjected to a process of brain-washing and indoctrination aimed at painting the other side as the eternal enemy. Similarly the international community has been bombarded with disinformation and cheap propaganda rhetoric. If those who matter on the Armenian and the Azerbaijani sides, had spent their efforts and resources on genuinely trying to resolve the conflict, instead of spreading disinformation, we will be today in a much better situation. Neither side has won the propaganda battle, and neither side will, for the stark reality is that in this conflict there is no black and white truth, in the same way that there is no black and white solution. The only way out is through serious negotiations based on good-will and compromise, and it is clear that whilst negotiations have taken place, not all of them have been in good faith.

The incidents of the last ten days are a continuation of a conflict that started many years ago. The cease fire that has been in place in the last twenty years has been violated thousands of times. That these violations can spiral very quickly into deadly incidents, or even outright war with very serious consequences, is something that everybody has known about for a long time. It is therefore hypocritical of the international community to simply issue statements expressing concern. What is required of the international community is "courage" and "political will", the two prerequisites that are often demanded from the sides in the conflict: "courage" to stand up to the sides and challenge their flawed narrative and tired rhetoric; "political will" to engage seriously with the task of resolving this conflict once and for all, rather than simply patching up again the cease-fire. If the international community is not ready to rise to the occasion it is better that it washes its hands completely from any involvement in trying to resolve this conflict, or it may find itself being an accomplice to the nasty things that are happening this summer on the hills and valleys of Karabakh, and the wider South Caucasus region.

This commentary was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu.

photo: A general view of the hills and valleys of Karabakh.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Ethiopian dam upsets Egypt, whilst China plays a difficult game

Ethiopian dam upsets Egypt, whilst China plays a difficult game

Ethiopia last week opened its mega dam on the River Nile, the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD). The launch has sparked a tense diplomatic battle between Ethiopia and Egypt, with Cairo denouncing it as “an unlawful unilateral act” and protesting to the United Nations Security Council. During an inauguration ceremony on Tuesday (9 September) Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed described the US$5 billion Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam as a “symbol of Ethiopian unity and national achievement". Several regional leaders, including Kenyan President William Ruto and Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, attended the event. Egypt, whose life has historically centred around the River Nile, believes the dam will threaten its water supply and cause shortages. Following the inauguration, Cairo warned that it reserved the right to take all measures provided for under international law and the UN Charter to “defend the existential interests of its people”. Sudan, has also raised concerns about dam safety and the risk of uncoordinated water releases.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Ethiopian dam upsets Egypt, whilst China plays a difficult game

Ethiopian dam upsets Egypt, whilst China plays a difficult game

Ethiopia last week opened its mega dam on the River Nile, the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD). The launch has sparked a tense diplomatic battle between Ethiopia and Egypt, with Cairo denouncing it as “an unlawful unilateral act” and protesting to the United Nations Security Council. During an inauguration ceremony on Tuesday (9 September) Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed described the US$5 billion Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam as a “symbol of Ethiopian unity and national achievement". Several regional leaders, including Kenyan President William Ruto and Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, attended the event. Egypt, whose life has historically centred around the River Nile, believes the dam will threaten its water supply and cause shortages. Following the inauguration, Cairo warned that it reserved the right to take all measures provided for under international law and the UN Charter to “defend the existential interests of its people”. Sudan, has also raised concerns about dam safety and the risk of uncoordinated water releases.