The first casualty of war is truth. Karabakh is no exception.

This is a commentary prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

For the last ten days fighting on the Armenia-Azerbaijan border, and the line of contact separating opposing forces in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone, has claimed the lives of dozens of soldiers, most of them young Armenian and Azerbaijani conscripts, and injured many more. Civilians have once more also been caught in the cross-fire, and in a disturbing development, representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross have also been fired on.

Both sides accuse each other of starting the fighting. Who really did we will probably never know. Accompanying the shooting has been a campaign of propaganda and disinformation. Each side is simultaneously trying to project itself as both victim and victor. However the real victims are the young people who have been killed or wounded and whose lives have been lost or shattered. Nobody is the victor, except death.

It is said that in any war, the first casualty is truth.This Karabakh conflict is no exception. The people of Armenia and Azerbaijan have for the last twenty years been subjected to a process of brain-washing and indoctrination aimed at painting the other side as the eternal enemy. Similarly the international community has been bombarded with disinformation and cheap propaganda rhetoric. If those who matter on the Armenian and the Azerbaijani sides, had spent their efforts and resources on genuinely trying to resolve the conflict, instead of spreading disinformation, we will be today in a much better situation. Neither side has won the propaganda battle, and neither side will, for the stark reality is that in this conflict there is no black and white truth, in the same way that there is no black and white solution. The only way out is through serious negotiations based on good-will and compromise, and it is clear that whilst negotiations have taken place, not all of them have been in good faith.

The incidents of the last ten days are a continuation of a conflict that started many years ago. The cease fire that has been in place in the last twenty years has been violated thousands of times. That these violations can spiral very quickly into deadly incidents, or even outright war with very serious consequences, is something that everybody has known about for a long time. It is therefore hypocritical of the international community to simply issue statements expressing concern. What is required of the international community is "courage" and "political will", the two prerequisites that are often demanded from the sides in the conflict: "courage" to stand up to the sides and challenge their flawed narrative and tired rhetoric; "political will" to engage seriously with the task of resolving this conflict once and for all, rather than simply patching up again the cease-fire. If the international community is not ready to rise to the occasion it is better that it washes its hands completely from any involvement in trying to resolve this conflict, or it may find itself being an accomplice to the nasty things that are happening this summer on the hills and valleys of Karabakh, and the wider South Caucasus region.

This commentary was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu.

photo: A general view of the hills and valleys of Karabakh.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan, met at the Kremlin in Moscow, on Wednesday 1, April, with Russian president Vladimir Putin. The current state and prospects of Russian-Armenian strategic partnership and alliance, integration cooperation in the Eurasian region, and current issues on the regional agenda, in particular the development of economic and transport-logistics ties in the South Caucasus, were discussed, according to the Kremlin website. In his remarks before the meeting, Prime Minister Pashinyan said our relations with the Russian Federation are very deep, they are very important to us, and, in my opinion, they are developing dynamically in the context of the new realities in our region, when peace has finally been established between Armenia and Azerbaijan. And I think this has a positive impact on our relations with the Russian Federation, because for the first time since our independence, we have a railway connection with the Russian Federation. We import goods from Russia via Azerbaijan by rail. I hope we will also export in the near future. This, of course, strengthens our traditional economic ties, and it strengthens our ties within the Eurasian Economic Union. Regarding the European Union, of course, we know that, in principle, membership in the two associations is incompatible. But what we're doing and the agenda we have, at least for now, are compatible. That's a fact. And as long as there's an opportunity to combine these agendas, we will. And when processes develop to the point where a decision must be made, I'm confident that we, the citizens of the Republic of Armenia, will make that decision. Of course, in this context, our relations with the Russian Federation have never been and never will be in question, because, as I have already said, these ties and relations are very deep and not subject to discussion. (read the report in full by clicking the image at the top).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)