The first casualty of war is truth. Karabakh is no exception.

This is a commentary prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

For the last ten days fighting on the Armenia-Azerbaijan border, and the line of contact separating opposing forces in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone, has claimed the lives of dozens of soldiers, most of them young Armenian and Azerbaijani conscripts, and injured many more. Civilians have once more also been caught in the cross-fire, and in a disturbing development, representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross have also been fired on.

Both sides accuse each other of starting the fighting. Who really did we will probably never know. Accompanying the shooting has been a campaign of propaganda and disinformation. Each side is simultaneously trying to project itself as both victim and victor. However the real victims are the young people who have been killed or wounded and whose lives have been lost or shattered. Nobody is the victor, except death.

It is said that in any war, the first casualty is truth.This Karabakh conflict is no exception. The people of Armenia and Azerbaijan have for the last twenty years been subjected to a process of brain-washing and indoctrination aimed at painting the other side as the eternal enemy. Similarly the international community has been bombarded with disinformation and cheap propaganda rhetoric. If those who matter on the Armenian and the Azerbaijani sides, had spent their efforts and resources on genuinely trying to resolve the conflict, instead of spreading disinformation, we will be today in a much better situation. Neither side has won the propaganda battle, and neither side will, for the stark reality is that in this conflict there is no black and white truth, in the same way that there is no black and white solution. The only way out is through serious negotiations based on good-will and compromise, and it is clear that whilst negotiations have taken place, not all of them have been in good faith.

The incidents of the last ten days are a continuation of a conflict that started many years ago. The cease fire that has been in place in the last twenty years has been violated thousands of times. That these violations can spiral very quickly into deadly incidents, or even outright war with very serious consequences, is something that everybody has known about for a long time. It is therefore hypocritical of the international community to simply issue statements expressing concern. What is required of the international community is "courage" and "political will", the two prerequisites that are often demanded from the sides in the conflict: "courage" to stand up to the sides and challenge their flawed narrative and tired rhetoric; "political will" to engage seriously with the task of resolving this conflict once and for all, rather than simply patching up again the cease-fire. If the international community is not ready to rise to the occasion it is better that it washes its hands completely from any involvement in trying to resolve this conflict, or it may find itself being an accomplice to the nasty things that are happening this summer on the hills and valleys of Karabakh, and the wider South Caucasus region.

This commentary was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu.

photo: A general view of the hills and valleys of Karabakh.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)