Read the report: 'The Hague in Europe, Europe in the World'

Read the full report here.

The Hague Conversations on the future of Europe in the World was a series of ten activities organised by LINKS Europe foundation, in association with the City of The Hague and with the support of the Hague Humanity Hub. The events were mostly held in person, with some also held online or in hybrid format, from September 2021 to February 2022 as part of the “Conference on the future of Europe” process.

Hundreds of citizens of The Hague, and from the city’s rich ecosystem of international organisations, diplomatic and political communities, think-tanks, education institutions, NGOs and community groups, attended and contributed to the conversation. Others joined from other parts of the Netherlands and the EU, and even from beyond, to contribute with their ideas. Opinions were also submitted in written form.

The big question discussed throughout the process was: What should be the future role of Europe in the world, and what should be the role of the City of The Hague in this?

Overwhelmingly, participants in The Hague Conversations on the future of Europe in the World believed in the importance of the European Union for future peace, justice and prosperity in Europe and its neighbourhood and in the wider world. They believe the European Union has been and should remain a force for good in the world. They also felt that The Hague can and should play a more active role in designing and delivering the new Global Europe agenda.

Participants had some key messages for the European Union:

  • A constant theme in all the discussions was the importance that the EU should listen more, and communicate better.

  • If citizens are expected to support, and pay, and in some circumstances even fight and die for a European role in the world, they need to be informed and as much as possible consulted; they expected their representatives in the European Parliament, and intermediaries between them and officialdom, be it think-tanks, civil society, academia or the media, to play a bigger role in oversight of EU foreign and security policy.

  • There was widespread recognition that the world is passing through a dangerous moment, and that Europe and its citizens were facing new dangers, and that hardly won principles and values that have become a bedrock of EU society were now under threat. The EU should remain a normative power, but it must lead by example: a Europe that is divided on its values cannot efficiently disseminate these values to the rest of the world.

  • Europe must sharpen its soft power tools, even as it slowly builds its hard power tools. The EU needs to see itself as a soft-power superpower. Hard power needs to be a last resort and delivered as part of a broader Team Europe effort, which should also include NATO.

  • Global Europe cannot succeed unless the EU gets its relations with its neighbourhood right. This requires more clarity on enlargement; stronger engagement in the process of developing a new European security architecture, and a renewed effort to engage with the neighbourhood south.

  • The EU should continue to pursue multliateralism and a rules-based international system as the basis of its foreign policy, supporting the UN and leading in the process of its reform.

  • EU foreign policy starts at home. Contradictions within the EU on issues of democracy, human rights and the rule of law weaken the European message abroad. At municipal and national levels, authorities need to empower citizens to better understand the role of Europe in the world, and be involved in the design and delivery of Global Europe.

Participants felt that The Hague, as the City of Peace and Justice, should be at the forefront of these processes, including through empowering its diverse communities, its strong ecosystem of think tanks, academic institutions, and civil society groups to work in partnership with governments and EU institutions for a Global Europe that is a force for good in the world.

 

source: LINKS Europe

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular