The EU's balancing act in its relationship with Azerbaijan is difficult but necessary

This is a commentary prepared by the editorial team of Commonspace.eu

The European Union Commissioner for Neighbourhood policy and Enlargement negotiations, Johannes Hahn, will visit Azerbaijan next week. The visit has been described by the Head of the EU Delegation in Baku, Ambassador Melana Mard as "important". Mard told the Azerbaijani media that such visits to partner countries were normal, and that Hahn's visit will also be part of the preparations for the Summit between the EU and the Eastern Partnership countries scheduled for November.

The visit however also comes at a crucial moment in EU-Azerbaijan relations. The two sides in February launched negotiations on a new framework agreement that will define the relationship between them for the next decade. Discussion are ongoing, and a new round is expected to take place in Baku also next week, with "political security and trade", reportedly on the agenda.

Both Azerbaijan and the European Union see benefit in strong ties between them, are keen to push the negotiations forward and bring them to a quick and successful conclusion.

There are however outstanding issues in the bilateral agenda that provide both sides with challenges. Some are technical, and are related to the need for Azerbaijan to update a raft of laws, measures and practises in the business and economy sphere. Some are more problematic since they are in the political sphere. There are concerns in Brussels regarding a number of governance issues, and a desire to see the Azerbaijani government doing more to address these concerns. EU officials made it clear at the start of the negotiations that these issues cannot be excluded from the relationship. Recent reports about incidences of abuse in prisons, as well as the issue of Azerbaijanis living in Georgia, addressed in a statement issued by the European Union on 4 June (read it here), complicate the context of the ongoing discussions.

Commissioner Hahn will have to address these issues when discussing with the Azerbaijani leadership next week. There are however no quick fixes. The process of reform in Azerbaijan is ongoing, but moving at a slower pace than was expected when president Ilham Aliev came to power in 2003. The European Union can nudge the process forward, but cannot push it beyond where the Azerbaijani leadership want to go. Patience is going to be required all round. The European Union however needs also to develop lines of communication with different elements of Azerbaijani society, including the political opposition. This process should be transparent, and properly communicated to the Azerbaijani authorities to avoid misperception, but it cannot be avoided. It is in everyone's interest that if there is going to be a new EU-Azerbaijan agreement this should have the broadest support possible within Azerbaijani society.

Another issue that hovers in the background is Nagorno-Karabakh. The EU is committed to a peaceful solution of the Karabakh conflict, and to supporting the work of the Minsk Group in this direction. The EU recognises the territorial integrity of the three South Caucasus countries. That ticks one important box for the Azerbaijani side. On this basis the EU does not deal with the de facto authorities in Nagorno-Karabakh. Unlike in other scenarios, such as in Abkhazia and South Ossetia and in Transdniestr the EU does not have a role in the mediation process. This means it sees no justification for engagement with the de facto authorities beyond the barest minimum. Finding the right wording for dealing with this issue in the new agreement will be challenging, especially since this wording needs to be in harmony with the wording that will be used in the EU-Armenia agreement, which is currently under consideration and which Armenia hopes to sign by the end of the year. Flexibility will be required on all sides - something which is in very short supply.

The European Union needs to remain fully engaged with Azerbaijan, working closely in partnership with the government, but also ensuring that other parts of society feel ownership of the relationship. During his visit to Baku, Commissioner Hahn needs to be firm but fair, principled, but not inflexible. There may be those in the EU and in the region, who for narrow reasons may want the negotiations between Azerbaijan and the European Union to fail.  That must not be allowed to happen. The European Union is engaged in a delicate balancing act in its relationship with Azerbaijan. It is a difficult task, but necessary.

This commentary was prepared by the editorial team of Commonspace.eu

Photo: President Aliyev of Azerbaijan meeting with the President of the European Council, Donald Tusk in Brussels in February 2017 (archive picture).

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations. A terse statement, published on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said, "The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia , S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU." This followed a statement issued the day before, by the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) that challenges the Armenian trajectory towards approximating to the European Union. Vladimir Putin is undertood to have personally pushed the other four EAEU leaders to issue the statement, which said: "Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union."
Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)