WAR OF WORDS

 

Armenian and Azerbaijani officials have since the summit in Kazan on 24 June blamed each other for not being able to do what many had expected for some time, namely to agree a series of basic principles that would pave the way for starting discussions on a peace treaty.

The choice of words has been unfortunate, sharp and in some instances insulting.

Yet both sides also claim that they are committed to the peace process and await the next steps of the international community.

This contradiction can be explained by the fact that something has changed recently in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement process. The international community has for the first time been showing a unity of purpose and a determination to bring the negotiations to a successful conclusion. Despite all the various hotspots in the world Karabakh has been high on the agenda of world leaders in the last six months. The President of Russia Dimitri Medvedev has staked some of his own political credibility, and invested a lot of his time in trying to broker a deal. The meeting in Kazan was the 9th one he has hosted since 2008.

The Obama administration, after an initial long pause has now also engaged with the process, with both the President and Secretary Clinton, working the phones over the last weeks. Indeed Karabakh has become an opportunity for Russia and the US to be seen working together. Europe is also engaged, with a clearer vision of what needs to happen and what it can do to support the process. The message from the international community is therefore unanimous and unequivocal.

Neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan want to be seen to be the spoilers. Hence the blame game after Kazan. Neither side however, it seems, is ready either to take the necessary last step to close the deal.

Trading insults is not helpful. At worst it can inflame the situation triggering accidents. Both sides need to calm down.

One positive outcome of the last few days has been that both sides have been releasing selectively information about what has been discussed in the secretive negotiations that have been going on for years. Each side is releasing the information that suits it. The mediators now need to step in and give the world a more comprehensive picture of where the negotiations are, and what are the stumbling blocks. Not to do so now may irreparably damage the process in front of the public opinion in the region and beyond.

It is now important that the international community does not take its eye off the Karabakh ball. As EU High Representative Catherine Ashton pointed out when addressing the European Parliament at the beginning of July what needs to be done has to be done before the end of the year. The Russian position is similarly that there is now neither the need nor the reason to delay further. It is decision time. They are right.

This commentary was compiled by the editorial team of www.commonspace.eu

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)