WAR OF WORDS

 

Armenian and Azerbaijani officials have since the summit in Kazan on 24 June blamed each other for not being able to do what many had expected for some time, namely to agree a series of basic principles that would pave the way for starting discussions on a peace treaty.

The choice of words has been unfortunate, sharp and in some instances insulting.

Yet both sides also claim that they are committed to the peace process and await the next steps of the international community.

This contradiction can be explained by the fact that something has changed recently in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement process. The international community has for the first time been showing a unity of purpose and a determination to bring the negotiations to a successful conclusion. Despite all the various hotspots in the world Karabakh has been high on the agenda of world leaders in the last six months. The President of Russia Dimitri Medvedev has staked some of his own political credibility, and invested a lot of his time in trying to broker a deal. The meeting in Kazan was the 9th one he has hosted since 2008.

The Obama administration, after an initial long pause has now also engaged with the process, with both the President and Secretary Clinton, working the phones over the last weeks. Indeed Karabakh has become an opportunity for Russia and the US to be seen working together. Europe is also engaged, with a clearer vision of what needs to happen and what it can do to support the process. The message from the international community is therefore unanimous and unequivocal.

Neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan want to be seen to be the spoilers. Hence the blame game after Kazan. Neither side however, it seems, is ready either to take the necessary last step to close the deal.

Trading insults is not helpful. At worst it can inflame the situation triggering accidents. Both sides need to calm down.

One positive outcome of the last few days has been that both sides have been releasing selectively information about what has been discussed in the secretive negotiations that have been going on for years. Each side is releasing the information that suits it. The mediators now need to step in and give the world a more comprehensive picture of where the negotiations are, and what are the stumbling blocks. Not to do so now may irreparably damage the process in front of the public opinion in the region and beyond.

It is now important that the international community does not take its eye off the Karabakh ball. As EU High Representative Catherine Ashton pointed out when addressing the European Parliament at the beginning of July what needs to be done has to be done before the end of the year. The Russian position is similarly that there is now neither the need nor the reason to delay further. It is decision time. They are right.

This commentary was compiled by the editorial team of www.commonspace.eu

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)