WAR OF WORDS

 

Armenian and Azerbaijani officials have since the summit in Kazan on 24 June blamed each other for not being able to do what many had expected for some time, namely to agree a series of basic principles that would pave the way for starting discussions on a peace treaty.

The choice of words has been unfortunate, sharp and in some instances insulting.

Yet both sides also claim that they are committed to the peace process and await the next steps of the international community.

This contradiction can be explained by the fact that something has changed recently in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement process. The international community has for the first time been showing a unity of purpose and a determination to bring the negotiations to a successful conclusion. Despite all the various hotspots in the world Karabakh has been high on the agenda of world leaders in the last six months. The President of Russia Dimitri Medvedev has staked some of his own political credibility, and invested a lot of his time in trying to broker a deal. The meeting in Kazan was the 9th one he has hosted since 2008.

The Obama administration, after an initial long pause has now also engaged with the process, with both the President and Secretary Clinton, working the phones over the last weeks. Indeed Karabakh has become an opportunity for Russia and the US to be seen working together. Europe is also engaged, with a clearer vision of what needs to happen and what it can do to support the process. The message from the international community is therefore unanimous and unequivocal.

Neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan want to be seen to be the spoilers. Hence the blame game after Kazan. Neither side however, it seems, is ready either to take the necessary last step to close the deal.

Trading insults is not helpful. At worst it can inflame the situation triggering accidents. Both sides need to calm down.

One positive outcome of the last few days has been that both sides have been releasing selectively information about what has been discussed in the secretive negotiations that have been going on for years. Each side is releasing the information that suits it. The mediators now need to step in and give the world a more comprehensive picture of where the negotiations are, and what are the stumbling blocks. Not to do so now may irreparably damage the process in front of the public opinion in the region and beyond.

It is now important that the international community does not take its eye off the Karabakh ball. As EU High Representative Catherine Ashton pointed out when addressing the European Parliament at the beginning of July what needs to be done has to be done before the end of the year. The Russian position is similarly that there is now neither the need nor the reason to delay further. It is decision time. They are right.

This commentary was compiled by the editorial team of www.commonspace.eu

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
The European Parliament approved the temporary elimination of customs duties on goods exported from Armenia to the EU in a plenary session.

The European Parliament approved the temporary elimination of customs duties on goods exported from Armenia to the EU in a plenary session.

The European Parliament, during its plenary session in Strasbourg, approved the European Commission's proposal to apply a system of trade measures for "Made in Armenia" products, which means there will be a temporary elimination of customs duties on a wide range of products imported from Armenia to the European Union.   The proposal presented by the European Commission was adopted at the plenary session of the Council of Europe with 583 votes in favor, 49 against and 39 abstentions. According to the proposal, the European Union plans to eliminate customs duties on a number of Armenian goods for a period of two years. At the same time, it is planned to establish duty-free import quotas for eight types of Armenian agricultural products. These include grapes, apricots, cherries, peaches, and cucumbers. The draft also provides for safeguard mechanisms that will allow the European Union to intervene, if necessary, if increased imports from Armenia have a negative impact on European producers. This step is due to the restrictions imposed by Russia on a number of important Armenian export products since May 2026. They relate, in particular, to alcoholic beverages, mineral waters, fruits and vegetables, as well as their transit through Russian territory. According to the European Commission, these restrictions have disrupted Armenia's traditional supply chains and significantly limited the country's access to traditional export markets. The situation has had a particularly severe impact on small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as agricultural producers, while creating challenges for Armenia's economic resilience. The EU sees the initiative as a temporary measure to support the Armenian economy and create additional opportunities for exporters to access the EU market. The next step for the proposal is formal approval by the EU Council. The regulation will enter into force the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Let us recall that on September 2, the Council of the European Union approved the proposal to establish temporary trade liberalization measures for Armenian products and sent the draft to the European Parliament for approval. 

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)